Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lucchesi v. Frederic N. Stimmell, M.D., Ltd.green2 sentences1991See Lucchesi v. Stimmell, 149 Ariz. 76 , 716 P.2d 1013 (1986). 1991See Lucchesi v. Stimmell, 149 Ariz. 76 , 716 P.2d 1013 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hollomon v. Keadle
green
2 sentences1999Hollomon v. Keadle, 326 Ark. 168 , 931 S.W.2d 413 (1996). 1999Hollomon v. Keadle, 326 Ark. 168 , 931 S.W.2d 413 (1996). | 3 | 1998–1999 |
Mark Drevlow v. Lutheran Church, Missouri Synod
green
2 sentences2006My reasoning is based on Drevlow v. Lutheran Church, Missouri Synod, 991 F.2d 468 (8th Cir. 1993), which dealt with the church’s suspension of a minister. 2006My reasoning is based on Drevlow v. Lutheran Church, Missouri Synod, 991 F.2d 468 (8th Cir.1993), which dealt with the church's suspension of a minister. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Angle v. Alexander
green
2 sentences2000Angle v. Alexander, 328 Ark. 714 , 945 S.W.2d 933 (1997). 2000Angle v. Alexander, 328 Ark. 714 , 945 S.W.2d 933 (1997). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Croom v. Younts
green
2 sentences1996Cherepski v. Walker, 323 Ark. 43 , 913 S.W.2d 761 (1996); Croom v. Younts, 323 Ark. 95 , 913 S.W.2d 283 (1996). 1996Cherepski v. Walker, 323 Ark. 43 , 913 S.W.2d 761 (1996); Croom v. Younts, 323 Ark. 95 , 913 S.W.2d 283 (1996). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Cherepski v. Walker
green
2 sentences1996Cherepski v. Walker, 323 Ark. 43 , 913 S.W.2d 761 (1996); Croom v. Younts, 323 Ark. 95 , 913 S.W.2d 283 (1996). 1996Cherepski v. Walker, 323 Ark. 43 , 913 S.W.2d 761 (1996); Croom v. Younts, 323 Ark. 95 , 913 S.W.2d 283 (1996). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford
green
2 sentences1989In Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford, 294 Ark. 239 , 743 S.W.2d 380 (1988), we adopted the rule that if an employee is discharged for exercising a statutory right, or for performing a duty required by law or the reasons for the discharge was in violation of some other well established public policy, we would recognize the employee’s wrongful discharge claim as an exception to the employment at will doctrine. 1989In Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford, 294 Ark. 239 , 743 S.W.2d 380 (1988), we adopted the rule that if an employee is discharged for exercising a statutory right, or for performing a duty required by law or the reasons for the discharge was in violation of some other well established public policy, we would recognize the employee’s wrongful discharge claim as an exception to the employment at will doctrine. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.