substance of a proposed instruction (Arizona) · Go Syfert
← Arizona issues

substance of a proposed instruction in Arizona

8 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Hoskinsgreen
ariz · 2000 · cited in 7 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2004–2020
2 sentences

2020Therefore, the court correctly reasoned that the jury instructions provided an "appropriate framework for the jury to render an appropriate verdict." See State v. Hoskins, 199 Ariz. 127, 145, ¶ 75 (2000) ("[W]hen the substance of a proposed instruction is adequately covered by other instructions, the superior court is not required to give it.").

2018"We review a trial court's denial of a requested jury instruction for an abuse of discretion." State v. Johnson , 212 Ariz. 425 , ¶ 15, 133 P.3d 735 (2006). ¶ 26 "[W]hen the substance of a proposed instruction is adequately covered by other instructions, the trial court is not required to give it." State v. Hoskins , 199 Ariz. 127 , ¶ 75, 14 P.3d 997 (2000).

47
State v. Barrazagreen
arizctapp · 2005 · cited in 2 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
2 sentences

2005State v. Barraza, 209 Ariz. 441, ¶ 8 , 104 P.3d 172, 175 (App.2005). “[W]hen the substance of a proposed instruction is adequately covered by other instructions, the trial court is not required to give it.” State v. Hoskins, 199 Ariz. 127, ¶ 75 , 14 P.3d 997, 1015 (2000).

2005State v. Barraza, 209 Ariz. 441, ¶ 8 , 104 P.3d 172, 175 (App.2005). “[W]hen the substance of a proposed instruction is adequately covered by other instructions, the trial court is not required to give it.” State v. Hoskins, 199 Ariz. 127, ¶ 75 , 14 P.3d 997, 1015 (2000).

22
State v. Mottgreen
ariz · 1997 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000State v. Mott, 187 Ariz. 536, 546 , 931 P.2d 1046, 1056 (1997).

2000State v. Mott, 187 Ariz. 536, 546 , 931 P.2d 1046, 1056 (1997).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Tyler green
arizctapp · 1986
2 sentences

2004He relies on State v. Tyler, 149 Ariz. 312 , 718 P.2d 214 (App.1986), for his contention that “it would be appropriate” to clarify that “passing control does not constitute possession.” In Tyler , the defendant’s theoiy had been that his mere “momentary innocent handling” of a prohibited weapon was insufficient to establish criminal possession. 149 Ariz. at 316 , 718 P.2d at 218 .

2004He relies on State v. Tyler, 149 Ariz. 312 , 718 P.2d 214 (App.1986), for his contention that “it would be appropriate” to clarify that “passing control does not constitute possession.” In Tyler , the defendant’s theoiy had been that his mere “momentary innocent handling” of a prohibited weapon was insufficient to establish criminal possession. 149 Ariz. at 316 , 718 P.2d at 218 .

22004–2004
State v. Johnson green
ariz · 2006
2 sentences

2018"We review a trial court's denial of a requested jury instruction for an abuse of discretion." State v. Johnson , 212 Ariz. 425 , ¶ 15, 133 P.3d 735 (2006). ¶ 26 "[W]hen the substance of a proposed instruction is adequately covered by other instructions, the trial court is not required to give it." State v. Hoskins , 199 Ariz. 127 , ¶ 75, 14 P.3d 997 (2000).

2018"We review a trial court's denial of a requested jury instruction for an abuse of discretion." State v. Johnson , 212 Ariz. 425 , ¶ 15, 133 P.3d 735 (2006). ¶ 26 "[W]hen the substance of a proposed instruction is adequately covered by other instructions, the trial court is not required to give it." State v. Hoskins , 199 Ariz. 127 , ¶ 75, 14 P.3d 997 (2000).

12018–2018

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-4031 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check