application of a general rule (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

application of a general rule in Colorado

8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1982–1990 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Sherman v. City of Colorado Springs Planning Commissiongreen
coloctapp · 1983 · cited in 4 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1985–1988
2 sentences

1988It recognized that “[a] challenge relative to the application of a statute or ordinance addresses the application of a general rule or policy to specific individuals, interests, or situations, and is generally a quasi-judicial action subject to review as authorized under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4).” Sherman v. Colorado Springs Planning Comm’n, 680 P.2d 1302, 1304 (Colo.App.1983) {Sherman I).

1988It recognized that "[a] challenge relative to the application of a statute or ordinance addresses the application of a general rule or policy to specific individuals, interests, or situations, and is generally a quasi-judicial action subject to review as authorized under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)." Sherman v. Colorado Springs Planning Comm'n, 680 P.2d 1302, 1304 (Colo.App.1983) ( Sherman I ).

44

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Snyder v. City of Lakewood green
colo · 1975
2 sentences

1983Snyder v. City of Lakewood, 189 Colo. 421 , 542 P.2d 371 (1975).

1983Snyder v. City of Lakewood, 189 Colo. 421 , 542 P.2d 371 (1975).

31982–1983
Tri-State Generation & Transmission Co. v. City of Thornton green
colo · 1982
1 sentence

1990Tri-State Generation, 647 P.2d at 676 n. 7 (dismissing a constitutional challenge to an ordinance as applied because such a challenge "is concerned with the application of a general rule or policy ‘to specific individuals, interests, or situations,’ and is generally a quasi-judicial act subject only to C.R.

11990–1990

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-4-102 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

FL 8 (1993–2020) CO 8 (1982–1990) OR 5 (1974–2011) NY 4 (1871–1943) NM 3 (2006–2020) TX 3 (1903–2007) ID 3 (1980–2008) LA 2 (2005–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check