provi-dency hearing (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

provi-dency hearing in Colorado

8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2004 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Jonesgreen
coloctapp · 1997 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004Cf. Craig v. People, supra, 986 P.2d at 963 n. 9 (potential for transformation of mandatory parole period into additional prison time, due to future wrongdoing, is not an immediate and automatic result of pleading guilty and is thus a collateral consequence); People v. Jones, 957 P.2d 1046, 1048 (Colo.App.1997) (reincarceration as a result of parole violation a collateral consequence of guilty plea).

11
Young v. Peoplegreen
colo · 2001 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
1 sentence

2002Young v. People, 30 P.3d 202, 206 (Colo.2001).

11
People v. Wellsgreen
colo · 1989 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
1 sentence

2000See People v. Wells, 776 P.2d 386 (Colo.1989).

11
People v. Williamsongreen
coloctapp · 1992 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
1 sentence

1996See People v. Williamson, 839 P.2d 519 (Colo.App.1992) (attorney-client privilege does not apply when information elicited is not of a confidential nature).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Craig v. People green
colo · 1999
1 sentence

2004Cf. Craig v. People, supra, 986 P.2d at 963 n. 9 (potential for transformation of mandatory parole period into additional prison time, due to future wrongdoing, is not an immediate and automatic result of pleading guilty and is thus a collateral consequence); People v. Jones, 957 P.2d 1046, 1048 (Colo.App.1997) (reincarceration as a result of parole violation a collateral consequence of guilty plea).

12004–2004
Clark v. People green
colo · 2000
1 sentence

2001Id. at 206-207 .

12001–2001
People v. Weed green
coloctapp · 1991
1 sentence

1999People v. Weed, 830 P.2d 1095 (Colo.App.1991).

11999–1999
Larson v. Goodman green
colo · 1972
1 sentence

1983People v. Colosacco, 177 Colo. 219 , 493 P.2d 650 (1972).

11983–1983
People v. Colosacco green
colo · 1972
1 sentence

1983People v. Colosacco, 177 Colo. 219 , 493 P.2d 650 (1972).

11983–1983
People v. Baca green
coloctapp · 1980
1 sentence

1982People v. Baca, supra. Both a plea leading to a normal sentence and one followed by a deferred sentence are preceded by a provi-dency hearing.

11982–1982

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check