Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Etheredge v. District of Columbiagreen2 sentences1998The negligence claim hinges on whether [the officer], (when he shot *351 [the victim]), failed to act as a reasonably prudent police officer would have acted." Id. at 918 . 1997The negligence claim hinges on whether Paige (when he shot Etheredge) failed to act as a reasonably prudent officer would have acted. 635 A.2d at 918 (citations omitted). | 1 | 2 |
Evans-Reid v. District of Columbiagreen1 sentence2020This court has “not resolved the question of burden of proof as to . . . privilege in an assault and battery claim . . . .” Smith, 882 A.2d at 791; see also Evans-Reid v. District of Columbia, 930 A.2d 930, 938 (D.C. 2007) (“assum[ing], without deciding, that where a plaintiff establishes a prima facie case of assault and battery and the officer invokes the qualified privilege as an affirmative defense, the officer bears the burdens of production and persuasion”). | 1 | 1 |
District of Columbia v. Downsgreen1 sentence1993See District of Columbia v. White, 442 A.2d 159, 161-63 (D.C.1982); District of Columbia v. Downs, 357 A.2d 857, 858-60 (D.C.1976). | 1 | 1 |
District of Columbia v. Whitegreen2 sentences1993See District of Columbia v. White, 442 A.2d 159, 161-63 (D.C.1982); District of Columbia v. Downs, 357 A.2d 857, 858-60 (D.C.1976). 1993See White, supra, 442 A.2d at 163 . | 1 | 1 |
Papanicolas v. Group Hospitalization, Inc.green1 sentence1991Hence, the trial judge erred in denying the District’s motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the assault and battery claim. 9 Jackson v. Condor Management Corp, Inc., 587 A.2d at 224 (directed verdict proper when no evidentiary foundation exists upon which a reasonable juror could base a reliable verdict) (citing Papanicolas v. Group Hospitalization, Inc., 434 A.2d 403, 404 (D.C.1981)); see also Oxendine v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 506 A.2d 1100, 1103 (D.C.1986); Payne v. Soft Sheen Prod., Inc., 486 A.2d 712, 719 (D.C.1985); Marshall v. Distri | 1 | 1 |
Oxendine v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.green1 sentence1991Hence, the trial judge erred in denying the District’s motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the assault and battery claim. 9 Jackson v. Condor Management Corp, Inc., 587 A.2d at 224 (directed verdict proper when no evidentiary foundation exists upon which a reasonable juror could base a reliable verdict) (citing Papanicolas v. Group Hospitalization, Inc., 434 A.2d 403, 404 (D.C.1981)); see also Oxendine v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 506 A.2d 1100, 1103 (D.C.1986); Payne v. Soft Sheen Prod., Inc., 486 A.2d 712, 719 (D.C.1985); Marshall v. Distri | 1 | 1 |
Payne v. Soft Sheen Products, Inc.green1 sentence1991Hence, the trial judge erred in denying the District’s motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the assault and battery claim. 9 Jackson v. Condor Management Corp, Inc., 587 A.2d at 224 (directed verdict proper when no evidentiary foundation exists upon which a reasonable juror could base a reliable verdict) (citing Papanicolas v. Group Hospitalization, Inc., 434 A.2d 403, 404 (D.C.1981)); see also Oxendine v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 506 A.2d 1100, 1103 (D.C.1986); Payne v. Soft Sheen Prod., Inc., 486 A.2d 712, 719 (D.C.1985); Marshall v. Distri | 1 | 1 |
Marshall v. District of Columbiagreen1 sentence1991Hence, the trial judge erred in denying the District’s motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the assault and battery claim. 9 Jackson v. Condor Management Corp, Inc., 587 A.2d at 224 (directed verdict proper when no evidentiary foundation exists upon which a reasonable juror could base a reliable verdict) (citing Papanicolas v. Group Hospitalization, Inc., 434 A.2d 403, 404 (D.C.1981)); see also Oxendine v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 506 A.2d 1100, 1103 (D.C.1986); Payne v. Soft Sheen Prod., Inc., 486 A.2d 712, 719 (D.C.1985); Marshall v. Distri | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
District of Columbia v. Thompsongreen2 sentences1991But see Thompson, 570 A.2d at 288 n. 6. 6. 1991But see Thompson, 570 A.2d at 288 n. 6. 6. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
District of Columbia v. Jackson
green
2 sentences2005We have not resolved the question of burden of proof as to reasonableness and privilege in an assault and battery claim, and whether expert evidence as to reasonableness of the police conduct must be introduced by the plaintiff, (Felicia) Jackson, supra, 810 A.2d at 395 n. 15. 2005We have not resolved the question of burden of proof as to reasonableness and privilege in an assault and battery claim, and whether expert evidence as to reasonableness of the police conduct must be introduced by the plaintiff, ( Felicia) Jackson, supra, 810 A.2d at 395 n. 15. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
King v. Kidd
green
2 sentences1997Id. at 663 (citing Thompson II, supra, 593 A.2d at 624 n. 2, 635). 1997Id. at 663 (citing Thompson II, supra, 593 A.2d at 624 n. 2, 635). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
District of Columbia v. Thompson
green
2 sentences1997Id. at 663 (citing Thompson II, supra, 593 A.2d at 624 n. 2, 635). 1997Id. at 663 (citing Thompson II, supra, 593 A.2d at 624 n. 2, 635). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.