Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Stategreen2 sentences2002See Smith v. State, 699 So.2d 629, 635-36 (Fla.1997). 2002See Smith v. State, 699 So.2d 629, 635-36 (Fla.1997). | 3 | 3 |
Reed v. Stategreen2 sentences1990See Reed v. State, 560 So.2d 203 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 230 , 112 L.Ed.2d 184 (1990). 1990See Reed v. State, 560 So.2d 203 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 230 , 112 L.Ed.2d 184 (1990). | 2 | 2 |
Clark v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.green2 sentences1990See Reed v. State, 560 So.2d 203 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 230 , 112 L.Ed.2d 184 (1990). 1990See Reed v. State, 560 So.2d 203 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 230 , 112 L.Ed.2d 184 (1990). | 2 | 2 |
Mills v. Stategreen2 sentences2000See Smith v. State, 699 So.2d 629, 636 (Fla.1997); Mills v. State, 462 So.2d 1075, 1079 (Fla.1985). 2000See Smith v. State, 699 So.2d 629, 636 (Fla.1997); Mills v. State, 462 So.2d 1075, 1079 (Fla.1985). | 1 | 1 |
Lusk v. Stategreen2 sentences2000In Lusk v. State, 446 So.2d 1038, 1041 (Fla.1984), the supreme court recognized that the test for determining jury competency is "whether the juror can lay aside any bias or prejudice and render his verdict solely upon the evidence presented and the instructions on the law given to him by the court." Deciding whether a prospective juror meets the Lusk test is within a trial court's discretion, based upon what the court hears and observes. 2000In Lusk v. State, 446 So.2d 1038, 1041 (Fla.1984), the supreme court recognized that the test for determining jury competency is "whether the juror can lay aside any bias or prejudice and render his verdict solely upon the evidence presented and the instructions on the law given to him by the court." Deciding whether a prospective juror meets the Lusk test is within a trial court's discretion, based upon what the court hears and observes. | 1 | 1 |
Hitchcock v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Hitchcock v. State, 578 So.2d 685, 688 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 311 , 116 L.Ed.2d 254 (1991). 1992Hitchcock v. State, 578 So.2d 685, 688 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 311 , 116 L.Ed.2d 254 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pentecost v. State
green
2 sentences1992Deciding whether a prospective juror meets the Lusk test is within a trial court's discretion, Pentecost v. State, 545 So.2d 861 (Fla. 1989), based upon what the court hears and observes. 1992Deciding whether a prospective juror meets the Lusk test is within a trial court's discretion, Pentecost v. State, 545 So.2d 861 (Fla. 1989), based upon what the court hears and observes. | 3 | 1990–1992 |
Henry v. State
green
2 sentences2003Henry, 756 So.2d at 172 . 2003Henry, 756 So.2d at 172 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Boushey v. Texas
green
2 sentences1992Hitchcock v. State, 578 So.2d 685, 688 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 311 , 116 L.Ed.2d 254 (1991). 1992Hitchcock v. State, 578 So.2d 685, 688 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 311 , 116 L.Ed.2d 254 (1991). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Pineda-Velasquez v. United States
green
2 sentences1992Hitchcock v. State, 578 So.2d 685, 688 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 311 , 116 L.Ed.2d 254 (1991). 1992Hitchcock v. State, 578 So.2d 685, 688 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 311 , 116 L.Ed.2d 254 (1991). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Hill v. State
green
2 sentences1989In Hill v. State, 477 So.2d 553 (Fla.1985), the Supreme Court held that, in applying the Lusk test, trial courts must utilize the rule laid down in Singer v. State, 109 So.2d 7 (Fla.1959): If there is a basis for any reasonable doubt as to any jurors possessing that state of mind which will enable him to render an impartial verdict based solely on the evidence submitted and the law announced at the trial, he should be ex cused on motion of a party, or by the court on it’s own motion. 1989In Hill v. State, 477 So.2d 553 (Fla.1985), the Supreme Court held that, in applying the Lusk test, trial courts must utilize the rule laid down in Singer v. State, 109 So.2d 7 (Fla.1959): If there is a basis for any reasonable doubt as to any jurors possessing that state of mind which will enable him to render an impartial verdict based solely on the evidence submitted and the law announced at the trial, he should be ex cused on motion of a party, or by the court on it’s own motion. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Singer v. State
green
2 sentences1989In Hill v. State, 477 So.2d 553 (Fla.1985), the Supreme Court held that, in applying the Lusk test, trial courts must utilize the rule laid down in Singer v. State, 109 So.2d 7 (Fla.1959): If there is a basis for any reasonable doubt as to any jurors possessing that state of mind which will enable him to render an impartial verdict based solely on the evidence submitted and the law announced at the trial, he should be ex cused on motion of a party, or by the court on it’s own motion. 1989In Hill v. State, 477 So.2d 553 (Fla.1985), the Supreme Court held that, in applying the Lusk test, trial courts must utilize the rule laid down in Singer v. State, 109 So.2d 7 (Fla.1959): If there is a basis for any reasonable doubt as to any jurors possessing that state of mind which will enable him to render an impartial verdict based solely on the evidence submitted and the law announced at the trial, he should be ex cused on motion of a party, or by the court on it’s own motion. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.