Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kelly E. Loudermilk v. Stategreen2 sentences2017See Loudermilk v. State, 211 So.3d 356, 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). 2017See Loudermilk v. State, 211 So. 3d 356, 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). | 2 | 2 |
Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurancegreen1 sentence2006See id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Paul v. State
neutral
1 sentence2013Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nichols
neutral
1 sentence2006Id. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Blakely v. Washington
green
2 sentences2005We affirm the order summarily denying Mr. Paul's rule 3.850 motion challenging his departure sentence as a violation of the principles set forth in Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 21 , 159 L.Ed.2d 851 (2004); and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). 2005We affirm the order summarily denying Mr. Paul's rule 3.850 motion challenging his departure sentence as a violation of the principles set forth in Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 21 , 159 L.Ed.2d 851 (2004); and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
J. K. v. Dauphin County Children and Youth Services
green
1 sentence2005We affirm the order summarily denying Mr. Paul's rule 3.850 motion challenging his departure sentence as a violation of the principles set forth in Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 21 , 159 L.Ed.2d 851 (2004); and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow
green
1 sentence2005We affirm the order summarily denying Mr. Paul's rule 3.850 motion challenging his departure sentence as a violation of the principles set forth in Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 21 , 159 L.Ed.2d 851 (2004); and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Apprendi v. New Jersey
green
2 sentences2005We affirm the order summarily denying Mr. Paul's rule 3.850 motion challenging his departure sentence as a violation of the principles set forth in Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 21 , 159 L.Ed.2d 851 (2004); and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). 2005We affirm the order summarily denying Mr. Paul's rule 3.850 motion challenging his departure sentence as a violation of the principles set forth in Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 21 , 159 L.Ed.2d 851 (2004); and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Bayles v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence2002Paul’s motion and entering judgment in its favor was the trial court’s conclusion that Bayles prohibited recovery from Laurence’s uninsured motorist policy in the instant case. 483 So.2d at 402 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Granville v. State
neutral
2 sentences1997In Granville v. State, 625 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), we reversed the trial court's denial of a motion to sever two drug sales arising out of transactions on different dates, despite the fact that the sales were made to the same informant within a week of each other at the same location, because each sale was a separate transaction. 1997In Granville v. State, 625 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), we reversed the trial court's denial of a motion to sever two drug sales arising out of transactions on different dates, despite the fact that the sales were made to the same informant within a week of each other at the same location, because each sale was a separate transaction. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.