Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Authentic Architectural Millworks, Inc. v. SCM Group USA, Inc.green2 sentences2025Thus, if the contract contains a merger clause, a party cannot argue they relied upon representations other than those contained in the contract.” Id. at 76 (1) (a) citing Authentic Architectural Millworks v. SCM Group USA, 262 Ga. App. 826, 828 (2) ( 586 SE2d 726 ) (2003). 2025Thus, if the contract contains a merger clause, a party cannot argue they relied upon representations other than those contained in the contract.” Id. at 76 (1) (a) citing Authentic Architectural Millworks v. SCM Group USA, 262 Ga. App. 826, 828 (2) ( 586 SE2d 726 ) (2003). | 1 | 2 |
Chhina Family Partnership, L.P. v. S-K Group of Motels, Inc.green2 sentences2008(Citation and emphasis omitted.) Chhina Family Partnership v. S-K Group of Motels, 275 Ga. App. 811, 812 (2) ( 622 SE2d 40 ) (2005). 2008(Citation and emphasis omitted.) Chhina Family Partnership v. S-K Group of Motels, 275 Ga. App. 811, 812 (2) ( 622 SE2d 40 ) (2005). | 1 | 1 |
Chip Kassinger, Inc. v. Steimergreen2 sentences2008Thus, if the contract contains a merger clause, a party cannot argue they relied upon representations other than those contained in the contract.”) (citation and punctuation omitted); Chip Kassinger, Inc. v. Steimer, 205 Ga. App. 349, 350-351 (1) ( 422 SE2d 241 ) (1992) (physical precedent only). 2. 2008Thus, if the contract contains a merger clause, a party cannot argue they relied upon representations other than those contained in the contract.”) (citation and punctuation omitted); Chip Kassinger, Inc. v. Steimer, 205 Ga. App. 349, 350-351 (1) ( 422 SE2d 241 ) (1992) (physical precedent only). 2. | 1 | 1 |
Leventhal v. Seitergreen2 sentences1996Leventhal v. Seiter, 208 Ga. App. 158, 162 (4) ( 430 SE2d 378 ) (1993). 1996Leventhal v. Seiter, 208 Ga. App. 158, 162 (4) ( 430 SE2d 378 ) (1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
PINNOCK v. KINGS CARLYLE CLUB APARTMENTS, LLC Et Al.
green
2 sentences2023(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Pinnock v. Kings Carlyle Club Apartments, 348 Ga. App. 72, 76 (1) (a) ( 819 SE2d 515 ) (2018). 2023See Overlook Gardens Properties, 366 Ga. App. at 827 (1) (a) (ii) (“[I]f the contract contains a merger clause, a party cannot argue they relied upon representations other than those contained in the contract.”) (citation omitted); Pinnock v. Kings Carlyle Club Apts., 348 Ga. App. 72, 76 (1) (a) ( 819 SE2d 515 ) 14 (2018) (fraudulent inducement claim barred by merger clause). | 2 | 2023–2023 |
Ainsworth v. Perreault
green
1 sentence2003Thus, if the contract contains a merger clause, a party cannot argue “they relied [upon] representations other than those contained in the contract.” Id. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.