8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hall v. Carneygreen2 sentences2017See Hang v. Wages & Sons Funeral Home, Inc., 262 Ga. App. 177, 180-182 ( 585 SE2d 118 ) (2003) (involving the premature cremation of a family member’s body before his viewing and funeral and post-cremation processing of the remains that removed bone fragments necessary for religious rituals); Hall v. Carney, 236 Ga. App. 172, 174 ( 511 SE2d 271 ) (1999) (involving the disinterment and removal of recently reburied remains of the plaintiff parents’ stillborn child). 2017See Hang v. Wages & Sons Funeral Home, Inc., 262 Ga. App. 177, 180-182 ( 585 SE2d 118 ) (2003) (involving the premature cremation of a family member’s body before his viewing and funeral and post-cremation processing of the remains that removed bone fragments necessary for religious rituals); Hall v. Carney, 236 Ga. App. 172, 174 ( 511 SE2d 271 ) (1999) (involving the disinterment and removal of recently reburied remains of the plaintiff parents’ stillborn child). | 2 | 2 |
Hang v. Wages & Sons Funeral Home, Inc.green2 sentences2017See Hang v. Wages & Sons Funeral Home, Inc., 262 Ga. App. 177, 180-182 ( 585 SE2d 118 ) (2003) (involving the premature cremation of a family member’s body before his viewing and funeral and post-cremation processing of the remains that removed bone fragments necessary for religious rituals); Hall v. Carney, 236 Ga. App. 172, 174 ( 511 SE2d 271 ) (1999) (involving the disinterment and removal of recently reburied remains of the plaintiff parents’ stillborn child). 2017See Hang v. Wages & Sons Funeral Home, Inc., 262 Ga. App. 177, 180-182 ( 585 SE2d 118 ) (2003) (involving the premature cremation of a family member’s body before his viewing and funeral and post-cremation processing of the remains that removed bone fragments necessary for religious rituals); Hall v. Carney, 236 Ga. App. 172, 174 ( 511 SE2d 271 ) (1999) (involving the disinterment and removal of recently reburied remains of the plaintiff parents’ stillborn child). | 2 | 2 |
Far East Conference v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2023See also id. (calling the creation of the doctrine “one of those creative judicial labors whereby modern administrative law is being developed as part of our traditional sys- tem of law”). 2023See also id. (calling the creation of the doctrine “one of those creative judicial labors whereby modern administrative law is being developed as part of our traditional sys- tem of law”). | 1 | 1 |
Hamilton v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Hamilton v. State, 239 Ga. 72, 77 ( 235 SE2d 515 ); Carpenter v. State, 167 Ga. App. 634, 641 ( 307 SE2d 19 ); see Cauley v. State, 130 Ga. App. 278, 286-288, 290-293 ( 203 SE2d 239 ). (a) Appellant contends the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to enter his plea of not guilty on the indictment which went out with the jury. 1992Hamilton v. State, 239 Ga. 72, 77 ( 235 SE2d 515 ); Carpenter v. State, 167 Ga. App. 634, 641 ( 307 SE2d 19 ); see Cauley v. State, 130 Ga. App. 278, 286-288, 290-293 ( 203 SE2d 239 ). (a) Appellant contends the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to enter his plea of not guilty on the indictment which went out with the jury. | 1 | 1 |
Carpenter v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Hamilton v. State, 239 Ga. 72, 77 ( 235 SE2d 515 ); Carpenter v. State, 167 Ga. App. 634, 641 ( 307 SE2d 19 ); see Cauley v. State, 130 Ga. App. 278, 286-288, 290-293 ( 203 SE2d 239 ). (a) Appellant contends the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to enter his plea of not guilty on the indictment which went out with the jury. 1992Hamilton v. State, 239 Ga. 72, 77 ( 235 SE2d 515 ); Carpenter v. State, 167 Ga. App. 634, 641 ( 307 SE2d 19 ); see Cauley v. State, 130 Ga. App. 278, 286-288, 290-293 ( 203 SE2d 239 ). (a) Appellant contends the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to enter his plea of not guilty on the indictment which went out with the jury. | 1 | 1 |
Cauley v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Hamilton v. State, 239 Ga. 72, 77 ( 235 SE2d 515 ); Carpenter v. State, 167 Ga. App. 634, 641 ( 307 SE2d 19 ); see Cauley v. State, 130 Ga. App. 278, 286-288, 290-293 ( 203 SE2d 239 ). (a) Appellant contends the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to enter his plea of not guilty on the indictment which went out with the jury. 1992Hamilton v. State, 239 Ga. 72, 77 ( 235 SE2d 515 ); Carpenter v. State, 167 Ga. App. 634, 641 ( 307 SE2d 19 ); see Cauley v. State, 130 Ga. App. 278, 286-288, 290-293 ( 203 SE2d 239 ). (a) Appellant contends the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to enter his plea of not guilty on the indictment which went out with the jury. | 1 | 1 |
Elliott v. Stategreen2 sentences1929As stated by Judge Simmons in Elliott v. State, 91 Ga. 694, 696 ( 17 S. E. 1004 ), “When a statute can not be sustained as a whole, the courts will uphold it in part when it is reasonably certain that to do so will correspond with the main purpose which the legislature sought to accomplish by its enactment, if, after the objectionable part is stricken, enough remains to accomplish that purpose.” McArthur v. State, 69 Ga. 444 (2). 1929As stated by Judge Simmons in Elliott v. State, 91 Ga. 694, 696 ( 17 S. E. 1004 ), “When a statute can not be sustained as a whole, the courts will uphold it in part when it is reasonably certain that to do so will correspond with the main purpose which the legislature sought to accomplish by its enactment, if, after the objectionable part is stricken, enough remains to accomplish that purpose.” McArthur v. State, 69 Ga. 444 (2). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cohen v. Baxter
green
1 sentence2002We also admonished that the creation of such a rule under those circumstances, would “open the door to the expansion of the per se rule to . . . other numerous categories.” Id. at 423 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Carpenter v. State
green
2 sentences1984This court has previously recognized that the legislature may legitimately pass an act recommending the creation of a state bar, Wallace v. Wallace, 225 Ga. 102 ( 166 SE2d 718 ) (1969); Sams v. Olah, supra, or punish as a crime the unauthorized practice of law, Huber v. State, 234 Ga. 357 ( 216 SE2d 73 ) (1975), but we have steadfastly maintained that "[m]atters relating to the practice of law, including the admission of practitioners, their discipline, suspension, and removal, are within the inherent and exclusive power of the Supreme Court of Georgia." Carpenter v. State, 250 Ga. 177 ( 297 S 1984This court has previously recognized that the legislature may legitimately pass an act recommending the creation of a state bar, Wallace v. Wallace, 225 Ga. 102 ( 166 SE2d 718 ) (1969); Sams v. Olah, supra, or punish as a crime the unauthorized practice of law, Huber v. State, 234 Ga. 357 ( 216 SE2d 73 ) (1975), but we have steadfastly maintained that "[m]atters relating to the practice of law, including the admission of practitioners, their discipline, suspension, and removal, are within the inherent and exclusive power of the Supreme Court of Georgia." Carpenter v. State, 250 Ga. 177 ( 297 S | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Huber v. State
green
2 sentences1984This court has previously recognized that the legislature may legitimately pass an act recommending the creation of a state bar, Wallace v. Wallace, 225 Ga. 102 ( 166 SE2d 718 ) (1969); Sams v. Olah, supra, or punish as a crime the unauthorized practice of law, Huber v. State, 234 Ga. 357 ( 216 SE2d 73 ) (1975), but we have steadfastly maintained that "[m]atters relating to the practice of law, including the admission of practitioners, their discipline, suspension, and removal, are within the inherent and exclusive power of the Supreme Court of Georgia." Carpenter v. State, 250 Ga. 177 ( 297 S 1984This court has previously recognized that the legislature may legitimately pass an act recommending the creation of a state bar, Wallace v. Wallace, 225 Ga. 102 ( 166 SE2d 718 ) (1969); Sams v. Olah, supra, or punish as a crime the unauthorized practice of law, Huber v. State, 234 Ga. 357 ( 216 SE2d 73 ) (1975), but we have steadfastly maintained that "[m]atters relating to the practice of law, including the admission of practitioners, their discipline, suspension, and removal, are within the inherent and exclusive power of the Supreme Court of Georgia." Carpenter v. State, 250 Ga. 177 ( 297 S | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Wallace v. Wallace
green
2 sentences1984This court has previously recognized that the legislature may legitimately pass an act recommending the creation of a state bar, Wallace v. Wallace, 225 Ga. 102 ( 166 SE2d 718 ) (1969); Sams v. Olah, supra, or punish as a crime the unauthorized practice of law, Huber v. State, 234 Ga. 357 ( 216 SE2d 73 ) (1975), but we have steadfastly maintained that "[m]atters relating to the practice of law, including the admission of practitioners, their discipline, suspension, and removal, are within the inherent and exclusive power of the Supreme Court of Georgia." Carpenter v. State, 250 Ga. 177 ( 297 S 1984This court has previously recognized that the legislature may legitimately pass an act recommending the creation of a state bar, Wallace v. Wallace, 225 Ga. 102 ( 166 SE2d 718 ) (1969); Sams v. Olah, supra, or punish as a crime the unauthorized practice of law, Huber v. State, 234 Ga. 357 ( 216 SE2d 73 ) (1975), but we have steadfastly maintained that "[m]atters relating to the practice of law, including the admission of practitioners, their discipline, suspension, and removal, are within the inherent and exclusive power of the Supreme Court of Georgia." Carpenter v. State, 250 Ga. 177 ( 297 S | 1 | 1984–1984 |
McArthur v. State
neutral
1 sentence1929As stated by Judge Simmons in Elliott v. State, 91 Ga. 694, 696 ( 17 S. E. 1004 ), “When a statute can not be sustained as a whole, the courts will uphold it in part when it is reasonably certain that to do so will correspond with the main purpose which the legislature sought to accomplish by its enactment, if, after the objectionable part is stricken, enough remains to accomplish that purpose.” McArthur v. State, 69 Ga. 444 (2). | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Hawes v. Georgia
green
1 sentence1928In the comparatively recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Hawes v. Georgia, 258 U. S. 1 (42 Sup. Ct. 204, 66 L. ed. 431), a writ of error to this court, it was ruled: “A State law providing that a person prosecuted for permitting apparatus for distilling intoxicating liquors to be upon real estate actually occupied by him shall be prima facie presumed to have known of the presence of such apparatus there found, does not violate due process of law, even where the defendant is not allowed to testify under oath or to have the testimony of his wife.” This seems to bear dire | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.