Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. Stategreen2 sentences2017See Thompson v. State, 313 Ga. App. 844, 849 (1) ( 723 SE2d 85 ) (2012). 3. 2017See Thompson v. State, 313 Ga. App. 844, 849 (1) ( 723 SE2d 85 ) (2012). 3. | 1 | 1 |
Ades v. Werthergreen2 sentences2004See Ades v. Werther, 256 Ga. App. 8, 12 (2) (a) ( 567 SE2d 340 ) (2002) (justifiable reliance ordinarily a question for the jury). 2004See Ades v. Werther, 256 Ga. App. 8, 12 (2) (a) ( 567 SE2d 340 ) (2002) (justifiable reliance ordinarily a question for the jury). | 1 | 1 |
Kinsey v. Stategreen1 sentence2003Kinsey, 259 Ga. App. at 654 (1). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Daniel v. the State
green
2 sentences2017Daniel v. State, 338 Ga. App. 389 ( 787 SE2d 281 ) (2016). 2017Daniel v. State, 338 Ga. App. 389 ( 787 SE2d 281 ) (2016). | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Payne v. State
green
2 sentences2016Here, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in responding to the jury’s questions as the response, contrary to Daniel’s claim, was not burden-shifting and instead “was legally accurate and not confusing or misleading!)]” Payne v. State, 219 Ga. App. 318 (1) (b) ( 464 SE2d 884 ) (1995). 2016Here, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in responding to the jury’s questions as the response, contrary to Daniel’s claim, was not burden-shifting and instead “was legally accurate and not confusing or misleading!)]” Payne v. State, 219 Ga. App. 318 (1) (b) ( 464 SE2d 884 ) (1995). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Gilford v. State
green
1 sentence2010Both of Daniel’s claims fail, however, because it is undisputed that prior to the time of trial, Daniel definitively knew the identity of the CL “It is axiomatic that harm as well as error must be established by an appellant in order to secure a reversal of his conviction.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Gilford v. State, 296 Ga. App. 651, 655 (4) ( 673 SE2d 40 ) (2009). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Hanson
green
2 sentences2004We granted certiorari to address whether, in light of Padron v. State, 254 Ga. App. 265 ( 562 SE2d 244 ) (2002) and State v. Hanson, 243 Ga. App. 532 ( 532 SE2d 715 ) (2000), the Court of Appeals correctly upheld the denial of Daniel’s motion to suppress. *841 1. 2004We granted certiorari to address whether, in light of Padron v. State, 254 Ga. App. 265 ( 562 SE2d 244 ) (2002) and State v. Hanson, 243 Ga. App. 532 ( 532 SE2d 715 ) (2000), the Court of Appeals correctly upheld the denial of Daniel’s motion to suppress. *841 1. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Padron v. State
green
2 sentences2004We granted certiorari to address whether, in light of Padron v. State, 254 Ga. App. 265 ( 562 SE2d 244 ) (2002) and State v. Hanson, 243 Ga. App. 532 ( 532 SE2d 715 ) (2000), the Court of Appeals correctly upheld the denial of Daniel’s motion to suppress. *841 1. 2004We granted certiorari to address whether, in light of Padron v. State, 254 Ga. App. 265 ( 562 SE2d 244 ) (2002) and State v. Hanson, 243 Ga. App. 532 ( 532 SE2d 715 ) (2000), the Court of Appeals correctly upheld the denial of Daniel’s motion to suppress. *841 1. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.