Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nealy v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Chalk, supra, 318 Ga. App. at 50 (1) (c) (v); Nealy, supra, 246 Ga. App. at 755 (3). 2013See Chalk, supra, 318 Ga. App. at 50 (1) (c) (v); Nealy, supra, 246 Ga. App. at 755 (3). | 4 | 4 |
Sims v. Stategreen2 sentences2014See Sims v. State, 268 Ga. 381, 382 (2) ( 489 SE2d 809 ) (1997) (finding that curative instructions were an “adequate remedy” when a defendant’s character was improperly placed into evidence by testimony regarding his prior convictions or criminal acts, especially when such testimony was inadvertent). (b) After the trial court issued its curative instructions, the State then questioned Hudson regarding a time when he had been arrested and provided his brother’s driver’s license, rather than his own, to officers. 2014See Sims v. State, 268 Ga. 381, 382 (2) ( 489 SE2d 809 ) (1997) (finding that curative instructions were an “adequate remedy” when a defendant’s character was improperly placed into evidence by testimony regarding his prior convictions or criminal acts, especially when such testimony was inadvertent). (b) After the trial court issued its curative instructions, the State then questioned Hudson regarding a time when he had been arrested and provided his brother’s driver’s license, rather than his own, to officers. | 2 | 2 |
Chalk v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Chalk, supra, 318 Ga. App. at 50 (1) (c) (v); Nealy, supra, 246 Ga. App. at 755 (3). 2013See Chalk, supra, 318 Ga. App. at 50 (1) (c) (v); Nealy, supra, 246 Ga. App. at 755 (3). | 2 | 2 |
Polk v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Letson v. State, 236 Ga. App. 340, 342 (2) ( 512 SE2d 55 ) (1999); Polk v. State, 225 Ga. App. 257, 259 (1) (c) ( 483 SE2d 687 ) (1997). 1999See Letson v. State, 236 Ga. App. 340, 342 (2) ( 512 SE2d 55 ) (1999); Polk v. State, 225 Ga. App. 257, 259 (1) (c) ( 483 SE2d 687 ) (1997). | 1 | 1 |
Letson v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Letson v. State, 236 Ga. App. 340, 342 (2) ( 512 SE2d 55 ) (1999); Polk v. State, 225 Ga. App. 257, 259 (1) (c) ( 483 SE2d 687 ) (1997). 1999See Letson v. State, 236 Ga. App. 340, 342 (2) ( 512 SE2d 55 ) (1999); Polk v. State, 225 Ga. App. 257, 259 (1) (c) ( 483 SE2d 687 ) (1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
O'NEAL v. State
green
1 sentence2011Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.