8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
White v. Kelsogreen2 sentences2017The claim is therefore procedurally barred unless petitioner can demonstrate cause for the failure to raise the claim and prejudice arising therefrom. [Cit.] Id. at 33 . 2002OCGA § 9-14-48 (d); White v. Kelso, 261 Ga. 32, 33 ( 401 SE2d 733 ) (1991). | 1 | 2 |
Benton v. Hinesgreen1 sentence2026However, “[a] lawyer’s failure to raise a claim on appeal might be unreasonable if that claim had clear and strong merit under the law as it existed at the time of the appeal,” Benton v. Hines, 306 Ga. 722, 724 (2019) (citation and punctuation omitted), and a failure to raise a claim on appeal that is “based upon [a] lack of understanding of or familiarity with the relevant law” is not strategic. | 1 | 1 |
Sullivan v. Kempgreen2 sentences2026Sullivan, 293 Ga. at 774 . 2026See Sullivan v. Kemp, 293 Ga. 770, 774 (2013) (concluding that appellate counsel’s failure to raise claim on direct appeal “fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and establishe[d] [that] appellate counsel’s performance was deficient”). | 1 | 1 |
T. C. Property Management, Inc. v. Tsaigreen1 sentence2020Mgmt., Inc., 267 Ga. App. at 741 (holding that the failure to raise a claim by objection or in a motion for a new trial waived appellate review). 47 OCGA § 19-6-15 (b) (2) (C); see OCGA § 19-6-15 (f) (5) (C) (providing that “credits for either parent’s other qualified child living in the parent’s home for whom the parent owes a legal duty of support may be considered by the court for the purpose of reducing the parent’s gross income”); Neal v. Hibbard, 296 Ga. 882, 888 (6) ( 770 SE2d 600 ) (2015) (explaining that “an adjustment for theoretical child support orders . . . allows a trial court to | 1 | 1 |
Neal v. Hibbardgreen2 sentences2020Mgmt., Inc., 267 Ga. App. at 741 (holding that the failure to raise a claim by objection or in a motion for a new trial waived appellate review). 47 OCGA § 19-6-15 (b) (2) (C); see OCGA § 19-6-15 (f) (5) (C) (providing that “credits for either parent’s other qualified child living in the parent’s home for whom the parent owes a legal duty of support may be considered by the court for the purpose of reducing the parent’s gross income”); Neal v. Hibbard, 296 Ga. 882, 888 (6) ( 770 SE2d 600 ) (2015) (explaining that “an adjustment for theoretical child support orders . . . allows a trial court to 2020Mgmt., Inc., 267 Ga. App. at 741 (holding that the failure to raise a claim by objection or in a motion for a new trial waived appellate review). 47 OCGA § 19-6-15 (b) (2) (C); see OCGA § 19-6-15 (f) (5) (C) (providing that “credits for either parent’s other qualified child living in the parent’s home for whom the parent owes a legal duty of support may be considered by the court for the purpose of reducing the parent’s gross income”); Neal v. Hibbard, 296 Ga. 882, 888 (6) ( 770 SE2d 600 ) (2015) (explaining that “an adjustment for theoretical child support orders . . . allows a trial court to | 1 | 1 |
Benham v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Benham v. State, 277 Ga. 516, 517-518 ( 591 SE2d 824 ) (2004); Kirkland v. State, 274 Ga. 778 (1) ( 560 SE2d 6 ) (2002). 2013See Benham v. State, 277 Ga. 516, 517-518 ( 591 SE2d 824 ) (2004); Kirkland v. State, 274 Ga. 778 (1) ( 560 SE2d 6 ) (2002). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kirkland v. State
green
2 sentences2013See Benham v. State, 277 Ga. 516, 517-518 ( 591 SE2d 824 ) (2004); Kirkland v. State, 274 Ga. 778 (1) ( 560 SE2d 6 ) (2002). 2013See Benham v. State, 277 Ga. 516, 517-518 ( 591 SE2d 824 ) (2004); Kirkland v. State, 274 Ga. 778 (1) ( 560 SE2d 6 ) (2002). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
AT&T v. Barnes
neutral
2 sentences2003In AT&T v. Barnes, 260 Ga. App. 209 ( 581 SE2d 260 ) (2003) (whole court), we held that the failure to raise the defense of the statute of limitation under OCGA § 34-9-104 in a timely manner at or *133 prior to the first hearing waived such defense. 2003In AT&T v. Barnes, 260 Ga. App. 209 ( 581 SE2d 260 ) (2003) (whole court), we held that the failure to raise the defense of the statute of limitation under OCGA § 34-9-104 in a timely manner at or *133 prior to the first hearing waived such defense. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Turpin v. Todd
green
2 sentences2000Turpin v. Todd, 268 Ga. 820 (2)(a), 493 S.E.2d 900 (1997). 2000Turpin v. Todd, 268 Ga. 820 (2)(a), 493 S.E.2d 900 (1997). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Black v. Hardin
green
2 sentences1991Black v. Hardin, 255 Ga. 239 ( 336 SE2d 754 ) (1985). 1991Black v. Hardin, 255 Ga. 239 ( 336 SE2d 754 ) (1985). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.