9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thomas v. Oldhamgreen2 sentences2006Thomas v. Oldham, 895 S.W.2d 352, 358 (Tex. 1995). 3 . 2006Thomas v. Oldham , 895 S.W.2d 352, 358 (Tex. 1995). [3] Because we conclude section 101.106 is dispositive of Wilson = s claims, we need not address Wilson = s official immunity issues. | 2 | 2 |
Fitz v. Days Inns Worldwide, Inc.green1 sentence2023See Green v. Parrack, 974 S.W.2d 200, 202 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.) (res judicata must generally be pleaded or it is waived); Fitz v. Days Inns Worldwide, Inc., 147 S.W.3d 467, 470 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004, pet. denied) (collateral estoppel must be pleaded at the trial court level or it is waived). | 1 | 1 |
Green v. Parrackgreen1 sentence2023See Green v. Parrack, 974 S.W.2d 200, 202 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.) (res judicata must generally be pleaded or it is waived); Fitz v. Days Inns Worldwide, Inc., 147 S.W.3d 467, 470 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004, pet. denied) (collateral estoppel must be pleaded at the trial court level or it is waived). | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Sieboldgreen1 sentence2014The Tenth Circuit, 9 Ravenbark v. State, 942 sw2d 711 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, no pet.). 10 See Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371, 376-77 (1879). 11 281 S.W.3d at 430-31 . | 1 | 1 |
Rousseau v. Stategreen2 sentences2014Yes, the Griffith retroactivity-on-direct-appeal rule applies to all new federal constitutional rules,23 but most federal constitutional violations may nevertheless be forfeited by a failure to raise the claim.24 The Supreme Court has itself explained that the newness of a constitutional rule does not necessarily exempt it from procedural default.25 21 See id. (analyzing the grand-jury issue that was previously decided adversely to the defendant in Rousseau). 2014See also id., 1998 Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Mosley v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See also id., 1998 Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Martinez v. Ryangreen1 sentence2013As Justice Scalia noted, if the states provide any counsel on habeas, they should provide counsel to all habeas applicants: "[W]hoever advises the State would himself be guilty of ineffective assistance if he did not counsel the appointment of state-collateral-review counsel in all cases-- lest the failure to raise that claim in the state proceedings be excused and the State be propelled into federal habeas review of the adequacy of trial-court representation that occurred many years ago." Martinez v. Ryan , 566 U.S. __ , 132 S.Ct. 1309, 1322 (2012) (Scalia, J., dissenting). 9. | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Jackson v. State, 745 S.W.2d 4, 18 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Karenev v. State
green
1 sentence2014The Tenth Circuit, 9 Ravenbark v. State, 942 sw2d 711 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, no pet.). 10 See Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371, 376-77 (1879). 11 281 S.W.3d at 430-31 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Keith v. State
green
1 sentence2012Appellant also failed to raise the issue in a post-judgment motion filed with the trial court.1 See Keith v. State, 975 S.W.2d 433 , 433–34 (Tex. App—Beaumont 1998, no pet.) (holding a failure to raise the claim presented on appeal in a post-verdict motion filed with the trial court fails to preserve error). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Cherry v. State
green
2 sentences1991Cook v. State, 702 S.W.2d 597 (Tex.Crim.App.1984); Cherry v. State, 507 S.W.2d 549 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974). 1991Cook v. State, 702 S.W.2d 597 (Tex.Crim.App.1984); Cherry v. State, 507 S.W.2d 549 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Cook v. State
green
2 sentences1991Cook v. State, 702 S.W.2d 597 (Tex.Crim.App.1984); Cherry v. State, 507 S.W.2d 549 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974). 1991Cook v. State, 702 S.W.2d 597 (Tex.Crim.App.1984); Cherry v. State, 507 S.W.2d 549 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Solis v. State
neutral
2 sentences1991Solis v. State, 718 S.W.2d 857 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1986), rev’d on other grounds, 792 S.W.2d 95 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). 1991Solis v. State, 718 S.W.2d 857 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1986), rev'd on other grounds, 792 S.W.2d 95 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Solis v. State
green
2 sentences1991Solis v. State, 718 S.W.2d 857 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1986), rev’d on other grounds, 792 S.W.2d 95 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). 1991Solis v. State, 718 S.W.2d 857 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1986), rev'd on other grounds, 792 S.W.2d 95 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.