8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Larry D. Hallgreen2 sentences2003See Hall, supra at 1116 . 2003See Hall, supra at 1116 . | 1 | 1 |
Shelton v. Stategreen2 sentences1998(Cit.)’ [Cit.]” Shelton v. State, 216 Ga. App. 634, 635 (2) ( 455 SE2d 304 ) (1995). 2. 1998(Cit.)’ [Cit.]” Shelton v. State, 216 Ga. App. 634, 635 (2) ( 455 SE2d 304 ) (1995). 2. | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Stategreen2 sentences1995Pretermitting the merits of this argument, the transcript before us does not reveal that Shelton objected to the introduction of the test results on this basis below, “and it is well established that grounds not raised by objection below may not be raised for the first time on appeal. [Cit.]” Smith v. State, 204 Ga. App. 576, 577 ( 420 SE2d 29 ) (1992). 3. 1995Pretermitting the merits of this argument, the transcript before us does not reveal that Shelton objected to the introduction of the test results on this basis below, “and it is well established that grounds not raised by objection below may not be raised for the first time on appeal. [Cit.]” Smith v. State, 204 Ga. App. 576, 577 ( 420 SE2d 29 ) (1992). 3. | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Thomas v. State, 196 Ga. App. 88, 90-91 (3) ( 395 SE2d 615 ) (1990). (b) Appellant did object below to the admissibility of the test result because of the delay of about an hour in advising him of his implied consent rights. 1992Thomas v. State, 196 Ga. App. 88, 90-91 (3) ( 395 SE2d 615 ) (1990). (b) Appellant did object below to the admissibility of the test result because of the delay of about an hour in advising him of his implied consent rights. | 1 | 1 |
Sanders v. Stategreen2 sentences1990“The state laid a proper foundation for the introduction of the test results. . . . [Cits.] The defendant’s challenge to the reliability of the test results . . . [did not demand that judgment be entered in his favor] but went merely to the weight to be placed on them by the jury.” Sanders v. State, 176 Ga. App. 869, 869-870 (1) ( 338 SE2d 5 ) (1985). 1990“The state laid a proper foundation for the introduction of the test results. . . . [Cits.] The defendant’s challenge to the reliability of the test results . . . [did not demand that judgment be entered in his favor] but went merely to the weight to be placed on them by the jury.” Sanders v. State, 176 Ga. App. 869, 869-870 (1) ( 338 SE2d 5 ) (1985). | 1 | 1 |
Huskins v. Stategreen2 sentences1982See Martin v. State, 135 Ga. App. 4, 7 (3) ( 217 SE2d 312 ); Huskins v. State, 245 Ga. 541, 543 (6) ( 266 SE2d 163 ). 6. 1982See Martin v. State, 135 Ga. App. 4, 7 (3) ( 217 SE2d 312 ); Huskins v. State, 245 Ga. 541, 543 (6) ( 266 SE2d 163 ). 6. | 1 | 1 |
Daniels v. Stategreen2 sentences1982Daniels v. State, 158 Ga. App. 476, 481 (7) ( 282 SE2d 118 ). 1982Daniels v. State, 158 Ga. App. 476, 481 (7) ( 282 SE2d 118 ). | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Stategreen2 sentences1982See Martin v. State, 135 Ga. App. 4, 7 (3) ( 217 SE2d 312 ); Huskins v. State, 245 Ga. 541, 543 (6) ( 266 SE2d 163 ). 6. 1982See Martin v. State, 135 Ga. App. 4, 7 (3) ( 217 SE2d 312 ); Huskins v. State, 245 Ga. 541, 543 (6) ( 266 SE2d 163 ). 6. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences2003Applying this standard in light of the circumstances in this case, especially the jury instructions given by the court and the introduction by the defense of alibi evidence comparable to that discussed by the prosecutor in her opening statement, we conclude that while the trial court erred by allowing the prosecutor to comment on this matter in her opening statement, it is highly probable that the prosecutor's comments did not contribute to the judgment, see id., and were not so prejudicial as to deny Parker a fair trial. 2003Applying this standard in light of the circumstances in this case, especially the jury instructions given by the court and the introduction by the defense of alibi evidence comparable to that discussed by the prosecutor in her opening statement, we conclude that while the trial court erred by allowing the prosecutor to comment on this matter in her opening statement, it is highly probable that the prosecutor’s comments did not contribute to the judgment, see id., and were not so prejudicial as to deny Parker a fair trial. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Southern Nitrogen Co. v. Manuel
neutral
2 sentences1990Assuming arguendo that the testimony provided by the trooper would not otherwise have been sufficient to establish a proper foundation for the introduction of the test results, we conclude that, by ignoring the repeated offers by the trooper and the state’s attorney to produce the information regarding the identity and qualifications of the individual who had drawn the blood, the appellant’s counsel gave the impression that he did not intend to insist on such evidence. “[A] party will not be heard to complain of error induced by his own conduct. . . . [Cits.]” Southern Nitrogen Co. v. Manuel, 1990Assuming arguendo that the testimony provided by the trooper would not otherwise have been sufficient to establish a proper foundation for the introduction of the test results, we conclude that, by ignoring the repeated offers by the trooper and the state’s attorney to produce the information regarding the identity and qualifications of the individual who had drawn the blood, the appellant’s counsel gave the impression that he did not intend to insist on such evidence. “[A] party will not be heard to complain of error induced by his own conduct. . . . [Cits.]” Southern Nitrogen Co. v. Manuel, | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Holton
green
2 sentences1985See generally OCGA § 40-6-392 (a); State v. Holton, 173 Ga. App. 241 (2) ( 326 SE2d 235 ) (1985). 1985See generally OCGA § 40-6-392 (a); State v. Holton, 173 Ga. App. 241 (2) ( 326 SE2d 235 ) (1985). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.