8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kurtz v. Williamsgreen2 sentences1997NOTES [1] We do not reach the issue of whether United's letters are subject to the exception to the publication rule as established in Kurtz v. Williams, 188 Ga.App. 14 (3), 371 S.E.2d 878 (1988). [2] This would be of particular importance to policyholders who did not happen to recall White's name. 1997NOTES [1] We do not reach the issue of whether United's letters are subject to the exception to the publication rule as established in Kurtz v. Williams, 188 Ga.App. 14 (3), 371 S.E.2d 878 (1988). [2] This would be of particular importance to policyholders who did not happen to recall White's name. | 2 | 3 |
McCandliss v. Cox Enterprises, Inc.green2 sentences2022“In Georgia, . . . the single publication rule governs actions for libel.” McCandliss v. Cox Enterprises, 265 Ga. App. 377, 378 (1) ( 593 SE2d 856 ) (2004) (citation and punctuation omitted), overruled in part on other grounds by Infinite Energy v. Pardue, 310 Ga. App. 355, 363 (4) ( 713 SE2d 14 456 ) (2011). 2022“In Georgia, . . . the single publication rule governs actions for libel.” McCandliss v. Cox Enterprises, 265 Ga. App. 377, 378 (1) ( 593 SE2d 856 ) (2004) (citation and punctuation omitted), overruled in part on other grounds by Infinite Energy v. Pardue, 310 Ga. App. 355, 363 (4) ( 713 SE2d 14 456 ) (2011). | 1 | 1 |
INFINITE ENERGY, INC. v. Parduegreen1 sentence2022“In Georgia, . . . the single publication rule governs actions for libel.” McCandliss v. Cox Enterprises, 265 Ga. App. 377, 378 (1) ( 593 SE2d 856 ) (2004) (citation and punctuation omitted), overruled in part on other grounds by Infinite Energy v. Pardue, 310 Ga. App. 355, 363 (4) ( 713 SE2d 14 456 ) (2011). | 1 | 1 |
Scouten v. Amerisave Mortgage Corp.green2 sentences2009Compare Scouten, 283 Ga. at 73 (1), 656 S.E.2d 820 , citing Atlanta Multispecialty Surgical Assoc. v. DeKalb Med. 2009Compare Scouten, 283 Ga. at 73 (1), 656 S.E.2d 820 , citing Atlanta Multispecialty Surgical Assoc. v. DeKalb Med. | 1 | 1 |
Hawkins v. Walkergreen2 sentences2008See id.; Hawkins v. Walker, 158 Ga. App. 562, 563 ( 281 SE2d 311 ) (1981). 2008See id.; Hawkins v. Walker, 158 Ga. App. 562, 563 ( 281 SE2d 311 ) (1981). | 1 | 1 |
Green v. Sun Trust Banks, Inc.green2 sentences1992Accord Green v. Sun Trust Banks, 197 Ga. App. 804 (4) ( 399 SE2d 712 ) (1990); Sigmon v. Womack, 158 Ga. App. 47 (1) ( 279 SE2d 254 ) (1981). “[This] exception to the publication rule is not a conditional defense destroyed by proof of malice, but rather, an element of the tort of slander or libel. 1992Accord Green v. Sun Trust Banks, 197 Ga. App. 804 (4) ( 399 SE2d 712 ) (1990); Sigmon v. Womack, 158 Ga. App. 47 (1) ( 279 SE2d 254 ) (1981). “[This] exception to the publication rule is not a conditional defense destroyed by proof of malice, but rather, an element of the tort of slander or libel. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rives v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.
green
2 sentences1979In so holding, the Court of Appeals stated that this result was demanded by Rives v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc., 110 Ga. App. 184 ( 138 SE2d 100 ) (1964), revd. on cert., 220 Ga. 485 ( 139 SE2d 395 ) (1964), conformed to on remand, 111 Ga. App. 6 ( 140 SE2d 304 ) (1965), in which the single publication rule was adopted as the law of the state. 1979In so holding, the Court of Appeals stated that this result was demanded by Rives v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc., 110 Ga. App. 184 ( 138 SE2d 100 ) (1964), revd. on cert., 220 Ga. 485 ( 139 SE2d 395 ) (1964), conformed to on remand, 111 Ga. App. 6 ( 140 SE2d 304 ) (1965), in which the single publication rule was adopted as the law of the state. | 2 | 1978–1979 |
Sigmon v. Womack
green
1 sentence1992Accord Green v. Sun Trust Banks, 197 Ga. App. 804 (4) ( 399 SE2d 712 ) (1990); Sigmon v. Womack, 158 Ga. App. 47 (1) ( 279 SE2d 254 ) (1981). “[This] exception to the publication rule is not a conditional defense destroyed by proof of malice, but rather, an element of the tort of slander or libel. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Shoffeitt v. Busbee
green
1 sentence1992Accord Green v. Sun Trust Banks, 197 Ga. App. 804 (4) ( 399 SE2d 712 ) (1990); Sigmon v. Womack, 158 Ga. App. 47 (1) ( 279 SE2d 254 ) (1981). “[This] exception to the publication rule is not a conditional defense destroyed by proof of malice, but rather, an element of the tort of slander or libel. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Rives v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.
green
2 sentences1979In so holding, the Court of Appeals stated that this result was demanded by Rives v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc., 110 Ga. App. 184 ( 138 SE2d 100 ) (1964), revd. on cert., 220 Ga. 485 ( 139 SE2d 395 ) (1964), conformed to on remand, 111 Ga. App. 6 ( 140 SE2d 304 ) (1965), in which the single publication rule was adopted as the law of the state. 1979In so holding, the Court of Appeals stated that this result was demanded by Rives v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc., 110 Ga. App. 184 ( 138 SE2d 100 ) (1964), revd. on cert., 220 Ga. 485 ( 139 SE2d 395 ) (1964), conformed to on remand, 111 Ga. App. 6 ( 140 SE2d 304 ) (1965), in which the single publication rule was adopted as the law of the state. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Rives v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences1979In so holding, the Court of Appeals stated that this result was demanded by Rives v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc., 110 Ga. App. 184 ( 138 SE2d 100 ) (1964), revd. on cert., 220 Ga. 485 ( 139 SE2d 395 ) (1964), conformed to on remand, 111 Ga. App. 6 ( 140 SE2d 304 ) (1965), in which the single publication rule was adopted as the law of the state. 1979In so holding, the Court of Appeals stated that this result was demanded by Rives v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc., 110 Ga. App. 184 ( 138 SE2d 100 ) (1964), revd. on cert., 220 Ga. 485 ( 139 SE2d 395 ) (1964), conformed to on remand, 111 Ga. App. 6 ( 140 SE2d 304 ) (1965), in which the single publication rule was adopted as the law of the state. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.