Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brockman v. DETROIT DIESEL ALLISON DIV., ETC.green2 sentences2010Brockman v. Detroit Diesel Allison Div. of General Motors Corp., 174 Ind.App. 240 , 366 N.E.2d 1201, 1203 (1977). 1991We affirmed the trial court's judgment in favor of the employer, holding "publication to an agent of plaintiff who is acting at plaintiff's behest and on his behalf is tantamount to a publication to plaintiff himself, and as such does not fulfill the publication requirement." Id. at 1208 . | 1 | 3 |
Matter of JNHgreen1 sentence2013See Matter of J.N.H., 659 N.E.2d 644 , 646 (Ind.Ct.App.1995) (recognizing that a person may generally change his or her name in the absence of a fraudulent purpose). | 1 | 1 |
Bals v. Verduzcogreen2 sentences2006This Court has held that “employee evaluation information communicated intracompany to management personnel may be considered published for purposes of a defamation action.” Bals v. Verduzco, 600 N.E.2d 1353, 1356 (Ind. 1992). 2006This Court has held that "employee evaluation information communicated in-tracompany to management personnel may be considered published for purposes of a defamation action." Bals v. Verduzco, 600 N.E.2d 1353, 1356 (Ind.1992). | 1 | 1 |
Eddie Trail and Katrinka Trail v. Boys and Girls Clubs of Northwest Indianagreen1 sentence2006Indiana, 845 N.E.2d 130, 136 (Ind.2006), we found that transmission of a report that reflected negatively upon the executive director between and among the directors of a nonprofit organization would constitute publication sufficient to support the publication requirement of a defamation claim. | 1 | 1 |
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Clisergreen2 sentences1996Accord Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. Cliser (1972), 267 Md. 406 , 298 A.2d 16 . 1996Accord Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. Cliser (1972), 267 Md. 406 , 298 A.2d 16 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McDaniel v. Crescent Motors, Inc.
green
2 sentences1977In a remarkably similar situation 4 in McDaniel v. Crescent Motors (1947), 249 Ala. 330 , 31 So.2d 343 , the court found there was no publication of alleged slanderous remarks made by the defendant to a representative of plaintiff’s union who was inquiring into the reasons for plaintiff’s discharge. 1977In a remarkably similar situation 4 in McDaniel v. Crescent Motors (1947), 249 Ala. 330 , 31 So.2d 343 , the court found there was no publication of alleged slanderous remarks made by the defendant to a representative of plaintiff’s union who was inquiring into the reasons for plaintiff’s discharge. | 2 | 1977–1977 |
Brockman v. Detroit Diesel Allison Division of General Motors Corp.
green
1 sentence2010Brockman v. Detroit Diesel Allison Div. of General Motors Corp., 174 Ind.App. 240 , 366 N.E.2d 1201, 1203 (1977). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Augustine v. First Fed. Sav. & L. Ass'n of Gary
green
2 sentences2009Trial judges could examine depositions at will without regard to the possibility that they might contain objectionable matter." Id. at 241-42 , 384 N.E.2d at 1020 . 2009Trial judges could examine depositions at will without regard to the possibility that they might contain objectionable matter." Id. at 241-42 , 384 N.E.2d at 1020 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Bundy v. McKnight
green
1 sentence1977An Indiana court in Bundy v. McKnight (1874), 48 Ind. 502 , points out that states having a statutory requirement that the Testator request the witnesses to sign do not require that the request come directly from the Testator: *306 It will be observed, that the . . . section does not require that the witnesses shall attest and subscribe the will at the request of the testator. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.