8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gredell v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.green2 sentences2006See Gredell, 346 Ill. 2006See Gredell, 346 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Petrovic v. The Department of Employment Securitygreen1 sentence2020See Petrovic, 2016 IL 118562, ¶ 22 ; 89 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Department of Central Management Services v. Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel
green
2 sentences2019The ALJ allowed the submission of prefiled direct evidence instead of live testimony, citing Department of Central Management Services/Illinois Commerce Comm’n, 406 Ill. 2018The ALJ allowed the submission of prefiled direct evidence instead of live testimony, citing Department of Central Management Services/Illinois Commerce Comm'n , 406 Ill. | 2 | 2018–2019 |
Provena Covenant Medical Center v. Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences2019Relying on Provena Covenant Medical Center v. Department of Revenue , 236 Ill. 2d 368 , 390, 339 Ill.Dec. 10 , 925 N.E.2d 1131 (2010) (superceded by statute), Midwest posits that the first five Korzen factors concern only whether the property is owned by a charitable institution. 2019Relying on Provena Covenant Medical Center v. Department of Revenue , 236 Ill. 2d 368 , 390, 339 Ill.Dec. 10 , 925 N.E.2d 1131 (2010) (superceded by statute), Midwest posits that the first five Korzen factors concern only whether the property is owned by a charitable institution. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Morgan v. Department of Financial & Professional Regulation
green
2 sentences2009Morgan I, 374 Ill. 2009Morgan, 374 Ill.App.3d at 304 , 312 Ill.Dec. 778 , 871 N.E.2d 178 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
McKenzie v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2004Under Fairview Haven, 153 Ill.App.3d at 773 , 106 Ill.Dec. 634 , 506 N.E.2d at 348 , "[f]irst, the court must accept the organization's characterization of the purpose of its activities and, second, determine whether the property is in fact exclusively[, i.e., primarily (see McKenzie, 98 Ill.2d at 98 , 74 Ill.Dec. 571 , 456 N.E.2d at 78 ),] used for the religious purposes." The dissent mischaracterizes this statement as suggesting "that `good faith' rather than `exclusive use'" is the *7 standard. 2004Under Fairview Haven, 153 Ill.App.3d at 773 , 106 Ill.Dec. 634 , 506 N.E.2d at 348 , "[f]irst, the court must accept the organization's characterization of the purpose of its activities and, second, determine whether the property is in fact exclusively[, i.e., primarily (see McKenzie, 98 Ill.2d at 98 , 74 Ill.Dec. 571 , 456 N.E.2d at 78 ),] used for the religious purposes." The dissent mischaracterizes this statement as suggesting "that `good faith' rather than `exclusive use'" is the *7 standard. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Fairview Haven v. Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences2004Under Fairview Haven, 153 Ill. 2004Under Fairview Haven, 153 Ill.App.3d at 773 , 106 Ill.Dec. 634 , 506 N.E.2d at 348 , "[f]irst, the court must accept the organization's characterization of the purpose of its activities and, second, determine whether the property is in fact exclusively[, i.e., primarily (see McKenzie, 98 Ill.2d at 98 , 74 Ill.Dec. 571 , 456 N.E.2d at 78 ),] used for the religious purposes." The dissent mischaracterizes this statement as suggesting "that `good faith' rather than `exclusive use'" is the *7 standard. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.