Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2025 9 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ira A. Watson Department Store v. Hamiltongreen2 sentences2023Ira A. Watson Dep’t Store v. Hamilton, 34 S.W.3d 48, 51 (Ky. 2000). 8 The ALJ’s analysis in this case was pithy, and perhaps something more could have been said in order to clarify his reasoning to the parties and better facilitate review on appeal. 2023Ira A. Watson Dep’t Store v. Hamilton, 34 S.W.3d 48, 51 (Ky. 2000). 8 The ALJ’s analysis in this case was pithy, and perhaps something more could have been said in order to clarify his reasoning to the parties and better facilitate review on appeal. | 2 | 3 |
Taylor Stumbo v. City of Ashlandgreen2 sentences2023The Board concluded the ALJ’s analysis regarding the permanent, total disability was not in compliance with the requirements of City of Ashland v. Stumbo, 461 S.W.3d 392, 396-97 (Ky. 2015). 2023The Board concluded the ALJ’s analysis regarding the permanent, total disability was not in compliance with the requirements of City of Ashland v. Stumbo, 461 S.W.3d 392, 396-97 (Ky. 2015). | 2 | 3 |
Western Baptist Hospital v. Kellygreen2 sentences2025Again, it is the Board’s opinion which we consider under the standard of review set forth in Kelly, 827 S.W.2d at 687-88 . 2025The standard of our review is set forth in Tryon Trucking, Inc. v. Medlin, 586 S.W.3d 233 (Ky. 2019): [L]ike any other issue in a workers’ compensation proceeding, the appellate courts may review the Board’s decision to remand to the ALJ for error, taking into consideration . . . the Board’s wide discretion to do so. [A]s always, we assess the Board’s decision to remand based upon whether it has “overlooked or misconstrued controlling statutes or precedent, or committed an error in assessing the evidence so flagrant as to cause gross injustice.” Id. at 238 (quoting Western Baptist Hosp. v. Kel | 1 | 2 |
McNutt Construction/First General Services v. Scottgreen1 sentence2021McNutt Construction/First General Servs. v. Scott, 40 S.W.3d 854, 859-860 (Ky. 2001). | 1 | 1 |
Cantrell Supply, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.green1 sentence2021Regarding ResCare’s argument alleging the ALJ erroneously interpreted and applied the parties’ Settlement Agreement, thereby depriving the employer of the benefit of its bargain, and resulting in gross injustice, we note: “An agreement to settle legal claims is essentially a contract subject to the rules of contract interpretation.” Cantrell Supply, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 94 S.W.3d 381, 384 (Ky. App. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Trane Commercial Systems v. Delena Tipton
green
2 sentences2025It contends that under Trane, supra, the job duties at the Christian Life Center were sufficiently similar to Griffiths’ past job duties to constitute a return to customary employment. 2021As to the ALJ’s analysis regarding entitlement to TTD benefits for the right and left shoulder injuries, the Board remanded the matter for a more detailed analysis pursuant to Livingood v. Transfreight, LLC, 467 S.W.3d 249 (Ky. 2015), and Trane Commercial Systems v. Tipton, 481 S.W.3d 800 (Ky. 2016). | 2 | 2021–2025 |
Livingood v. Transfreight, LLC
green
1 sentence2021As to the ALJ’s analysis regarding entitlement to TTD benefits for the right and left shoulder injuries, the Board remanded the matter for a more detailed analysis pursuant to Livingood v. Transfreight, LLC, 467 S.W.3d 249 (Ky. 2015), and Trane Commercial Systems v. Tipton, 481 S.W.3d 800 (Ky. 2016). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Staples, Inc. v. Konvelski
green
1 sentence2018The ALJ then correctly cites Staples, Inc. v. Konvelski , 56 S.W.3d 412 , 415 (Ky. 2001), to observe an "injury" is actually the "work-related traumatic event," itself, and not any resulting "harmful change in the human organism." Thus, in the present case, the ALJ found Mullins had suffered the stipulated "injury"-or traumatic event-on September 14, 2014, while lifting a patient in the course of his work. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Chrysalis House, Inc. v. Tackett
green
1 sentence2016Since the ALJ issued the opinion and order on remand and the opinion and order on reconsideration, this Court has reversed the portion of Chrysalis House, 283 S.W.3d 671 , which held that the claimant's failure to earn the same or greater wages must relate to the work-related injury before the two multiplier may be awarded. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Parson v. Union Underwear Co.
green
1 sentence1992In reliance upon Parson v. Union Underwear Co., Ky.App., 758 S.W.2d 43 (1988), the Court of Appeals seized upon the settlement of the 1982 injury entered by the employer and the Special Fund as proof that the Special Fund had already “admitted” that the injured worker had a dormant non-disabling condition. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.