Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1881–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
James Leonard Mills v. The State of Wyominggreen2 sentences2025In Mills v. State, 2020 WY 14, ¶ 28 , 458 P.3d 1, 11 (Wyo. 2020), the Supreme Court of Wyoming held that the completion of a warning citation by the officer who conducted the traffic stop “demonstrate[d] that [the officer] had the time reasonably required to complete the purposes of the traffic stop.” The court “decline[d] to hold that [the officer’s] purported desire to ‘explain’ the warning citation after he completed it was related to the purpose of the traffic stop in these circumstances.” Id. 2025In Mills v. State, 2020 WY 14, ¶ 28 , 458 P.3d 1, 11 (Wyo. 2020), the Supreme Court of Wyoming held that the completion of a warning citation by the officer who conducted the traffic stop “demonstrate[d] that [the officer] had the time reasonably required to complete the purposes of the traffic stop.” The court “decline[d] to hold that [the officer’s] purported desire to ‘explain’ the warning citation after he completed it was related to the purpose of the traffic stop in these circumstances.” Id. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Dinelligreen1 sentence2024People v. Dinelli, 217 Ill. 2d 387, 403 (2005). ¶ 29 Defendant argues that Marlow asked him questions wholly unrelated to the purpose of the stop and otherwise delayed the completion of the warning to await the canine unit’s arrival. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Luedemanngreen1 sentence2024“In reviewing a circuit court’s decision on a motion to suppress evidence, we employ a two-part standard of review.” People v. Rice, 2019 IL App (3d) 170134, ¶ 16 (citing People v. Luedemann, 222 Ill. 2d 530, 542 (2006)). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Ricegreen1 sentence2024“In reviewing a circuit court’s decision on a motion to suppress evidence, we employ a two-part standard of review.” People v. Rice, 2019 IL App (3d) 170134, ¶ 16 (citing People v. Luedemann, 222 Ill. 2d 530, 542 (2006)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Weber v. Anderson
neutral
2 sentences1950(Weber v. Anderson, 73 Ill. 439 .) It is not necessary that land should be inclosed by a fence or that a house should be erected on it to constitute possession, or that it should be reduced to cultivation. 1933(Weber v. Anderson, 73 Ill. 439 .) It is not necessary that land should be inclosed by a fence or that a house should be erected on it to constitute possession, or that it should be reduced to cultivation. | 2 | 1933–1950 |
People v. McGuire
green
1 sentence2020We noted this was “clear error.” However, the trial court, at the completion of its inquiry for each group of jurors then asked both the State and defense to indicate whether they “believe that [the prospective jurors] ha[ve] been properly admonished as far as [the] Zehr principles.” McGuire, 2017 IL App (4th) 150695, ¶ 9 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Sebby
green
2 sentences2020As a result, defendant’s acquiescence precluded raising the issue under a “plain error” analysis on appeal and distinguished the facts in McGuire -6- from People v. Sebby, 2017 IL 119445 , 89 N.E.3d 675 , decided by the supreme court only five months before. 2020As a result, defendant’s acquiescence precluded raising the issue under a “plain error” analysis on appeal and distinguished the facts in McGuire -6- from People v. Sebby, 2017 IL 119445 , 89 N.E.3d 675 , decided by the supreme court only five months before. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Hardaway v. Civil Service Commission
green
2 sentences2005Hardaway, 52 Ill.App.3d at 497 , 10 Ill.Dec. 325 , 367 N.E.2d at 780 . 2005Hardaway, 52 Ill. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Reedy v. Millizen
neutral
1 sentence1896(Reedy v. Millizen, supra). | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Lowther v. Chappell
neutral
1 sentence1881The Supreme Court of Alabama, in Lowther et al. v. Chappell, 8 Ala. 353 , held, under this section, “a payment by one of several joint debtors, before the statute has completed a bar, will not prevent the completion of the bar as to the others, at the expiration of the time within which the statute required suit to be brought on the original evidence of debt, relied on to sustain the action. ” This was followed in the same court by Myatts & Moore v. Bell, 41 id. 222; Knight v. Clements, 45 id. 89. | 1 | 1881–1881 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.