Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Visgargreen2 sentences2016People v. Visgar, 120 Ill. 1986People v. Visgar (1983), 120 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Lucasgreen1 sentence1992App. 3d 827, 833 ; see People v. Lucas (1986), 140 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Curtis
neutral
2 sentences1992PARENTI: I have reviewed them, your Honor.” This court has previously stated that “[exclusion of evidence is a last resort, required only where a recess or a continuance would be ineffective. [Citation.] Generally the failure to seek a continuance waives a claim of error based upon a discovery violation.” (People v. Curtis (1986), 141 Ill. 1989App. 3d 827, 832 , 491 N.E.2d 134, 138 .) Further, exclusion of the evidence is a last resort, required only where a recess or continuance would be ineffective, and failure to seek a continuance waives the claim of error on appeal. 141 Ill. | 2 | 1989–1992 |
People v. Nelson
green
2 sentences1986Ed. 2d 217 , 102 S. Ct. 404 .) Generally, the failure to seek a continuance waives a claim of error based upon a discovery violation ( 92 Ill. 1986App. 3d 35, 45 .) By failing to seek the lesser sanction of a continuance and insisting on the exclusion of the witness, defendant did not preserve his contention that he was prejudiced by the State’s failure to disclose Chadwick’s prior robbery conviction which could have been discovered during a continuance. 92 Ill. | 2 | 1983–1986 |
Stuart v. Estelle
green
2 sentences1986Ed. 2d 217 , 102 S. Ct. 404 .) Generally, the failure to seek a continuance waives a claim of error based upon a discovery violation ( 92 Ill. 1986Ed. 2d 217 , 102 S. Ct. 404 ), and, failure to seek a continuance waives a claim of error based upon surprise. | 2 | 1986–1986 |
People v. Jackson
green
1 sentence1992(People v. Jackson (1990), 198 Ill. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
People v. Lee
neutral
2 sentences1980(People v. Lee (1980), 86 Ill. 1980When later reference was made to the violation of discovery, the defense made no request for a continuance. • 3 Generally, the failure to seek a continuance waives a claim of error based upon surprise. ( People v. Lee (1980), 86 Ill. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.