Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shockley v. Industrial Commissiongreen2 sentences2007A reviewing court will not set aside the Commission's decision unless its analysis is contrary to law (see Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Comm'n, 85 Ill.2d 213, 216 , 52 Ill.Dec. 623 , 422 N.E.2d 625 (1981)) or its fact determinations are against the manifest weight of the evidence (see Shockley v. Industrial Comm'n, 75 Ill.2d 189, 193 , 25 Ill.Dec. 798 , 387 N.E.2d 674 (1979)). 2007A reviewing court will not set aside the Commission's decision unless its analysis is contrary to law (see Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Comm'n, 85 Ill.2d 213, 216 , 52 Ill.Dec. 623 , 422 N.E.2d 625 (1981)) or its fact determinations are against the manifest weight of the evidence (see Shockley v. Industrial Comm'n, 75 Ill.2d 189, 193 , 25 Ill.Dec. 798 , 387 N.E.2d 674 (1979)). | 1 | 2 |
Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Commissiongreen2 sentences2007A reviewing court will not set aside the Commission's decision unless its analysis is contrary to law (see Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Comm'n, 85 Ill.2d 213, 216 , 52 Ill.Dec. 623 , 422 N.E.2d 625 (1981)) or its fact determinations are against the manifest weight of the evidence (see Shockley v. Industrial Comm'n, 75 Ill.2d 189, 193 , 25 Ill.Dec. 798 , 387 N.E.2d 674 (1979)). 2007A reviewing court will not set aside the Commission's decision unless its analysis is contrary to law (see Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Comm'n, 85 Ill.2d 213, 216 , 52 Ill.Dec. 623 , 422 N.E.2d 625 (1981)) or its fact determinations are against the manifest weight of the evidence (see Shockley v. Industrial Comm'n, 75 Ill.2d 189, 193 , 25 Ill.Dec. 798 , 387 N.E.2d 674 (1979)). | 1 | 2 |
Rossler v. Morton Grove Police Pension Boardgreen1 sentence1995See Rossler v. Morton Grove Police Pension Board (1989), 178 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roberson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N
green
2 sentences2017Roberson, 225 Ill. 2d at 173 , 866 N.E.2d at 199 . 2017Roberson, 225 Ill. 2d at 173 , 866 N.E.2d at 199 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Argianas v. Chestler
green
1 sentence1996Argianis v. Chestler, 259 Ill. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. Pollution Control Board
green
1 sentence1978(Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. Pollution Control Board (1974), 20 Ill. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Andrew Peter Yiannopoulos v. Robert H. Robinson, District Director of Immigration, U. S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
green
1 sentence1974(See Yiannopoulos v. Robinson, 247 F.2d 655 (7th Cir.).) A failure to observe the technical rules of evidence is not sufficient reason to set aside an agency’s decision unless the error materially affects the rights of a party and results in substantial injustice to him. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Rauland Div., Zenith Radio v. Metro. San. Dist.
neutral
2 sentences1973(Mitchell v. Sackett (1960), 27 Ill.App.2d 335 , 169 N.E.2d 833 ; Bauland Division, Zenith Radio Corp. v. Metropolitan Sanitary Dist. of Greater Chicago (1971), 2 Ill.App.3d 35 , 275 N.E.2d 756 .) A failure to observe the technical rules of evidence is not sufficient reason to set aside an agency’s decision unless the error or failure materially affects the rights of any party and results in substantial injustice to him. 1973(Mitchell v. Sackett (1960), 27 Ill.App.2d 335 , 169 N.E.2d 833 ; Bauland Division, Zenith Radio Corp. v. Metropolitan Sanitary Dist. of Greater Chicago (1971), 2 Ill.App.3d 35 , 275 N.E.2d 756 .) A failure to observe the technical rules of evidence is not sufficient reason to set aside an agency’s decision unless the error or failure materially affects the rights of any party and results in substantial injustice to him. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Mitchell v. Sackett
green
2 sentences1973(Mitchell v. Sackett (1960), 27 Ill.App.2d 335 , 169 N.E.2d 833 ; Bauland Division, Zenith Radio Corp. v. Metropolitan Sanitary Dist. of Greater Chicago (1971), 2 Ill.App.3d 35 , 275 N.E.2d 756 .) A failure to observe the technical rules of evidence is not sufficient reason to set aside an agency’s decision unless the error or failure materially affects the rights of any party and results in substantial injustice to him. 1973(Mitchell v. Sackett (1960), 27 Ill.App.2d 335 , 169 N.E.2d 833 ; Bauland Division, Zenith Radio Corp. v. Metropolitan Sanitary Dist. of Greater Chicago (1971), 2 Ill.App.3d 35 , 275 N.E.2d 756 .) A failure to observe the technical rules of evidence is not sufficient reason to set aside an agency’s decision unless the error or failure materially affects the rights of any party and results in substantial injustice to him. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.