defendant establishes a qualified privilege (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

defendant establishes a qualified privilege in Illinois

8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2024 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Kuwik v. Starmark Star Marketing & Administration, Inc.green
ill · 1993 · cited in 7 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1999–2024
2 sentences

2022Once a defendant establishes a qualified privilege, however, a plaintiff must show “ ‘ “a direct intention to injure another, or *** a reckless disregard of [the defamed party’s] rights and of the consequences that may result to him.” ’ [Citation.]” Id. at 30 .

2021“Where no qualified privilege exits, the plaintiff need only show that the defendant acted with negligence in making the defamatory statements to prevail.” Id. “[O]nce a defendant establishes a qualified privilege,” however, “a plaintiff must prove that the defendant either intentionally published the material while knowing the matter was false, or displayed a reckless disregard to the matter’s falseness”—i.e., published the statements “despite a high degree of awareness of probable falsity” or while entertaining “serious doubts as to [their] truth.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id. at

37

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Kainrath v. Grider green
illappct · 2018
1 sentence

2021“An abuse of a qualified privilege may consist of any reckless act that shows a disregard for the defamed party’s rights, including the failure to properly investigate the truth of the matter, to limit the scope of the material, or to send the material to only the proper parties.” Id. at 30 . ¶ 25 We noted in the interlocutory appeal, as we confirm here, that “even if such a privilege arose, there is at least a question of material fact regarding whether Mr. Grider abused the privilege by sending his 2015 letter to parties not reasonably believed to be necessary to accomplish any 17 Nos. 1-20-

12021–2021
Mittelman v. Witous red
ill · 1990
2 sentences

1993(Mittelman v. Witous (1989), 135 Ill. 2d 220, 237 .) Reckless disregard as to the matter’s falseness has been defined in Illinois as publishing the defamatory matter “despite a high degree of awareness of probable falsity or entertaining serious doubts as to its truth.” Mittelman, 135 Ill. 2d at 237-38 .

1993(Mittelman v. Witous (1989), 135 Ill. 2d 220, 237 .) Reckless disregard as to the matter’s falseness has been defined in Illinois as publishing the defamatory matter “despite a high degree of awareness of probable falsity or entertaining serious doubts as to its truth.” Mittelman, 135 Ill. 2d at 237-38 .

11993–1993
Troman v. Wood green
ill · 1975
1 sentence

1993(See Troman v. Wood (1975), 62 Ill. 2d 184, 198 .) However, once a defendant establishes a qualified privilege, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant either intentionally published the material while knowing the matter was false, or displayed a reckless disregard as to the matter’s falseness.

11993–1993

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IL § 735 ILCS 5/2-619 (4) CFR § 29c.f.r.1604.11 (3) IL § 735 ILCS 5/2-615 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check