Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Tyegreen2 sentences1998People v. Tye , 141 Ill. 2d 1, 24 (1990)." (Emphasis added.) Tooles , 177 Ill. 2d at 469 , 687 N.E.2d at 51 . 1998People v. Tye, 141 Ill. 2d 1, 24 (1990).” (Emphasis added.) Tooles, 177 Ill. 2d at 469 , 687 N.E.2d at 51 . | 6 | 6 |
People v. Toolesgreen2 sentences2022“The determination whether a jury waiver was made understandingly *** turns on the facts and circumstances of each particular case.” People v. Tooles, 177 Ill. 2d 462, 469 (1997). 2020“The determination whether a jury waiver was made understandingly instead turns on the facts and circumstances of each particular case.” Tooles, 177 Ill. 2d at 469 . | 1 | 6 |
People v. Braceygreen1 sentence2020The operative inquiry for a court of review is whether the record, including any admonishments and written waiver, “establishes that defendant knew the difference between a bench trial and a jury trial and voluntarily chose the former.” Bannister, 232 Ill. 2d at 71 ; People v. Bracey, 213 Ill. 2d 265, 271 (2004). ¶ 14 In the present case, defendant filed a jury waiver indicating that her waiver of the right to a jury was being done “knowingly and understandingly.” While the court accepted that waiver, it did so without any sort of admonitions to defendant regarding the nature of a jury trial o | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Bannister
green
1 sentence2020The operative inquiry for a court of review is whether the record, including any admonishments and written waiver, “establishes that defendant knew the difference between a bench trial and a jury trial and voluntarily chose the former.” Bannister, 232 Ill. 2d at 71 ; People v. Bracey, 213 Ill. 2d 265, 271 (2004). ¶ 14 In the present case, defendant filed a jury waiver indicating that her waiver of the right to a jury was being done “knowingly and understandingly.” While the court accepted that waiver, it did so without any sort of admonitions to defendant regarding the nature of a jury trial o | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.