Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1944–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Wassellgreen2 sentences2002As an exception to the above rule, “[e]vidence of a defendant's commission of other crimes is generally admissible when it is relevant to prove a material question other than the defendant's propensity to commit the crime charged, such as modus operandi , intent, identity, motive, or absence of mistake.” People v. Wassell , 321 Ill. 2002As an exception to the above rule, “[ejvidence of a defendant’s commission of other crimes is generally admissible when it is relevant to prove a material question other than the defendant’s propensity to commit the crime charged, such as modus operandi, intent, identity, motive, or absence of mistake.” People v. Wassell, 321 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Klinergreen2 sentences2002App. 3d 1013, 1017 (2001), citing People v. Kliner , 185 Ill. 2d 81, 146 (1998). 2002App. 3d 1013, 1017 (2001), citing People v. Kliner, 185 Ill. 2d 81, 146 (1998). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers of the National Ass'n of Realtors v. National Real Estate Ass'n
green
2 sentences2012American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, 191 Ill.App.3d at 869-70 , 138 Ill.Dec. 966 , 548 N.E.2d 379 . 2012American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, 191 Ill.App.3d at 869-70 , 138 Ill.Dec. 966 , 548 N.E.2d 379 . | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Bundy v. Church League of America
green
1 sentence1989(Bundy, 125 Ill. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
U. S. Collins v. Industrial Commission
green
1 sentence1979An exception to the above rule is found in Collins v. Industrial Com. (1957), 12 Ill. 2d 200 , where this court had an opportunity to construe a similar statutory limitation on attorney fees under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (see Ill. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Ellingwood v. Ellingwood
green
1 sentence1977App. 3d 587 , 323 N.E.2d 571 .) The exception to the above rule is when the doctrine of equitable estoppel is applied and then the doctrine may “be applied to all or part of the past installments in an appropriate case.” (Johnson v. Johnson, 26 Ill. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Johnson v. Johnson
neutral
2 sentences1977App. 3d 587 , 323 N.E.2d 571 .) The exception to the above rule is when the doctrine of equitable estoppel is applied and then the doctrine may “be applied to all or part of the past installments in an appropriate case.” (Johnson v. Johnson, 26 Ill. 1977App. 3d 64, 66 , 324 N.E.2d 450, 452 .) Thus, the equitable estoppel theory is an exception to the otherwise inflexible rule. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Bride v. Stormer
green
1 sentence1944An undisclosed principal whose authorized agent has made such a contract in his behalf can neither sue nor be sued on it.” Because of the particular facts shown in the case of Bride v. Stormer, 368 Ill. 524 , we believe it was proved to be an exception to the above rule and it is inapplicable on the record shown in the present case. | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.