Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Arroyo v. Chicago Transit Authoritygreen2 sentences2015Eleventh-Hour Filing ¶ 113 In its final issue raised on appeal, AVI alleges the trial court's consent to plaintiff's eleventh-hour filing of new causes of action and the trial court's denial of AVI's motion for a trial continuance were contrary to law, prejudicial to AVI, and an abuse of discretion. ¶ 114 Section 2-616(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure provides: "A pleading may be amended at any time, before or after judgment, to conform the pleadings to the proofs, upon terms as to costs and continuance that may be just." 735 ILCS 5/2-616(c) (West 2012). ¶ 115 The four relevant factors to be 2015Eleventh-Hour Filing ¶ 113 In its final issue raised on appeal, AVI alleges the trial court’s consent to plaintiff’s eleventh-hour filing of new causes of action and the trial court’s denial of AVI’s motion for a trial continuance were contrary to law, prejudicial to AVI, and an abuse of discretion. ¶ 114 Section 2-616(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure provides: “A pleading may be amended at any time, before or after judgment, to conform the pleadings to the proofs, upon terms as to costs and continuance that may be just.” 735 ILCS 5/2-616(c) (West 2012). ¶ 115 The four relevant factors to be | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pullia v. Builders Square, Inc.
green
2 sentences2002Consideration of the four relevant factors (see Pullia , 265 Ill. 2002Consideration of the four relevant factors (see Pullia, 265 Ill. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
The People v. Tetter
green
2 sentences1972In People v. Tetter, 42 Ill.2d 569 , 250 N.E.2d 433 (1969), the Illinois Supreme Court lists the four relevant factors for consideration of a claim of denial of the constitutional right to a speedy trial. 1972In People v. Tetter, 42 Ill.2d 569 , 250 N.E.2d 433 (1969), the Illinois Supreme Court lists the four relevant factors for consideration of a claim of denial of the constitutional right to a speedy trial. | 2 | 1970–1972 |
Margolis v. Director of Department of Revenue
green
1 sentence1993Margolis, 180 Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
United States v. Julian Perez
green
1 sentence1969(United States v. Perez (7th cir., 1968), 398 F.2d 658, 661 .) Those factors cannot be considered in isolation, but must be viewed in their totality, as appears from the following cases cited by the State and defendant, in determining whether there was a denial of the constitutional right in any case. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.