Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re A.M.green2 sentences2021See In re A.M., 2020 IL App (4th) 190645 , ¶ 23 (the appellate court had jurisdiction over a contempt order even though it failed to provide a sanction because it was appealed following the court’s final order relating to parenting time); Ill. 2021See In re A.M., 2020 IL App (4th) 190645 , ¶ 23 (the appellate court had jurisdiction over a contempt order even though it failed to provide a sanction because it was appealed following the court’s final order relating to parenting time); Ill. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Marriage of Steelegreen2 sentences2026“As set - 16 - forth in Exhibit A of the Judgement, each party was awarded $5,631,903 in marital assets, which is an equal division of the marital estate (excluding cryptocurrency).” ¶ 46 As Justin notes, the court’s division of the marital estate should not be considered piecemeal, but, rather, evaluated in the context of the whole judgment to determine if the distribution was made in “just proportions.” In re Marriage of Steele, 212 Ill. 2026“As set - 16 - forth in Exhibit A of the Judgement, each party was awarded $5,631,903 in marital assets, which is an equal division of the marital estate (excluding cryptocurrency).” ¶ 46 As Justin notes, the court’s division of the marital estate should not be considered piecemeal, but, rather, evaluated in the context of the whole judgment to determine if the distribution was made in “just proportions.” In re Marriage of Steele, 212 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Young v. Hermangreen1 sentence2024See Young, 2018 IL App (4th) 170001, ¶¶ 56, 64 . | 1 | 1 |
Grunstad v. Coopergreen1 sentence2024See Grunstad, 2012 IL App (3d) 120524, ¶ 23 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Cavazos
green
2 sentences2017Justin Cavazos, 2015 IL App (2d) 120444, ¶ 81 . ¶ 75 We rejected Justin’s claim, albeit with misgivings about the legislature’s willingness to restrict the discretion of trial courts that are given the difficult task of deciding appropriate punishments for juvenile offenders. 2016Justin Cavazos, 2015 IL App (2d) 120444, ¶ 81 . ¶ 75 We rejected Justin’s claim, albeit with misgivings about the legislature’s willingness to restrict the discretion of trial courts that are given the difficult task of deciding appropriate punishments for juvenile offenders. | 3 | 2015–2017 |
People v. Denson
green
2 sentences2022However, after briefing in this case was complete, we granted Justin’s motion to cite our supreme court’s recent decision in People v. Denson, 2014 IL 116231, ¶¶ 18 , wherein the court confirmed that, in criminal cases, even absent a trial objection, issues may be preserved where the defendant raises them in response to motions in limine and again raises them in a posttrial motion. 2015However, after briefing in this case was complete, we granted Justin’s motion to cite our supreme court’s recent decision in People v. Denson, 2014 IL 116231, ¶¶ 18 , wherein the court confirmed that, in criminal cases, even absent a trial objection, issues may be preserved where the defendant raises them in response to motions in limine and again raises them in a posttrial motion. | 2 | 2015–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.