Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1977–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2014Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). 2014Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Perezgreen1 sentence2026As such, any prejudice stemming from additional references to non-propensity purposes for the other crimes evidence seems speculative given that the evidence was permissible for propensity. e.g. id. (noting that a limiting jury instruction improperly including other non-propensity reasons is often harmless error); People v. Jones, 2023 IL App (1st) 220126-U, ¶ 59 (IPI Criminal No. 3.14 has little to no value where other crimes evidence is permissible for propensity evidence because the usual purpose of IPI Criminal No. 3.14 is to prevent a jury from using other-crimes evidence for propensity); | 1 | 1 |
People v. Hudsongreen1 sentence2023“Supreme Court Rule 451(a) (134 Ill. 2d R. 451(a)) requires a trial court to instruct the jury pursuant to the [Illinois Pattern Jury Instruction] IPI criminal instructions unless the trial court determines that the IPI instruction does not accurately state the law.” People v. Hudson, 222 Ill. 2d 392, 399-400 (2006). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Potts
green
1 sentence2026As such, any prejudice stemming from additional references to non-propensity purposes for the other crimes evidence seems speculative given that the evidence was permissible for propensity. e.g. id. (noting that a limiting jury instruction improperly including other non-propensity reasons is often harmless error); People v. Jones, 2023 IL App (1st) 220126-U, ¶ 59 (IPI Criminal No. 3.14 has little to no value where other crimes evidence is permissible for propensity evidence because the usual purpose of IPI Criminal No. 3.14 is to prevent a jury from using other-crimes evidence for propensity); | 1 | 2026–2026 |
People v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2026As such, any prejudice stemming from additional references to non-propensity purposes for the other crimes evidence seems speculative given that the evidence was permissible for propensity. e.g. id. (noting that a limiting jury instruction improperly including other non-propensity reasons is often harmless error); People v. Jones, 2023 IL App (1st) 220126-U, ¶ 59 (IPI Criminal No. 3.14 has little to no value where other crimes evidence is permissible for propensity evidence because the usual purpose of IPI Criminal No. 3.14 is to prevent a jury from using other-crimes evidence for propensity); | 1 | 2026–2026 |
People v. Sebby
green
1 sentence2023Under the limiting jury instruction, however, the testimony of these other witnesses was admissible only to determine whether defendant had the requisite intent to touch U.A. for his own sexual gratification (see 720 ILCS 5/11-1.60(f) (West 2018); id. § 11.01 (definition of “sexual conduct”))—if the jury believed U.A.’s testimony, in the first place, that defendant touched her. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Veach
green
1 sentence2022People v. Veach, 2017 IL 120649, ¶ 46 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Falco
green
1 sentence2022“It is well settled in Illinois that counsel’s choice of jury instructions, and the decision to rely on one theory of defense to the exclusion of others, is a matter of trial strategy.” People v. Falco, 2014 IL App (1st) 111797, ¶ 16 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Olson
green
2 sentences1977In State v. Olson (1966), 274 Minn. 225 , 143 N.W.2d 69 , the court stated that it is difficult to conceive of a jury not considering such evidence on the issue of guilt. 1977In State v. Olson (1966), 274 Minn. 225 , 143 N.W.2d 69 , the court stated that it is difficult to conceive of a jury not considering such evidence on the issue of guilt. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.