Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McKinney v. American Standard Ins. Co.
neutral
2 sentences2006McKinney, 296 Ill. 2006McKinney, 296 Ill. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Economy Preferred Insurance v. Ingold
green
2 sentences2000Ingold , 302 Ill. 2000Ingold, 302 Ill. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Cummins v. Country Mutual Insurance
green
2 sentences1998Cummins, 178 Ill. 2d 474 . 1998Cummins , 178 Ill. 2d 474 , __ N.E.2d __ . | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Melson v. Illinois National Insurance
green
1 sentence1995App. 3d 1025 , 274 N.E.2d 664 , and Glidden for the proposition that subparagraphs B and C of the limits of liability clause of endorsement PP0001 relating to medical payments coverage are contrary to public policy because their damages exceed the available coverage. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Otto v. Allstate Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence1979App. 3d 58 , 275 N.E.2d 766 ; Allstate Insurance Co. v. Mole (5th Cir. 1969), 414 F.2d 204, 205 .) This purpose is not necessarily at odds with the intent of the limits-of-liability clause or the statement on the declaration page: the limits-of-liability clause still can be read as applying to each of the cars and the amounts on the declaration page clearly state a “per accident” not a “per car” recovery. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Allstate Insurance Company v. Edward W. Mole
green
1 sentence1979App. 3d 58 , 275 N.E.2d 766 ; Allstate Insurance Co. v. Mole (5th Cir. 1969), 414 F.2d 204, 205 .) This purpose is not necessarily at odds with the intent of the limits-of-liability clause or the statement on the declaration page: the limits-of-liability clause still can be read as applying to each of the cars and the amounts on the declaration page clearly state a “per accident” not a “per car” recovery. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.