Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 3 courts 1952–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
The People v. Hairstongreen1 sentence1975A mechanical application of the test for legal consistency adopted by our Supreme Court in People v. Hairston (1970), 46 Ill.2d 348, 362 (namely, “‘In law there is no inconsistency in verdicts of acquittal and conviction upon charges of crimes composed of different elements, but arising out of the same state of facts’ ”) would lead to the conclusion that the verdicts in the instant case were not legally inconsistent since the crime of murder of John Sterling and the crimes of aggravated battery of Tommie Akins, Robert Chatmon, and Barbara King are obviously crimes composed of different essenti | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hansen v. Illinois Racing Board
green
2 sentences2005Hansen , 179 Ill. 2005Hansen, 179 Ill. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
People v. Easton
green
1 sentence2020People v. Easton, 2018 IL 122187, ¶ 25 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Blumstein v. State
green
1 sentence1998This Court has declined to require Claimants to bring “exhausting” actions against third parties where such action is legally baseless or barred (see Blumstein v. State (1995), 47 Ill. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
People v. Caffrey
green
2 sentences1985Due process does not require an impossible level of specificity in penal statutes (People v. Caffrey (1983), 97 Ill. 2d 526, 530 , 455 N.E.2d 60 ), nor does it compel a mechanical application of analysis. 1985Due process does not require an impossible level of specificity in penal statutes (People v. Caffrey (1983), 97 Ill. 2d 526, 530 , 455 N.E.2d 60 ), nor does it compel a mechanical application of analysis. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.
green
2 sentences1985(Village of Hoffman Estates v. Flip-side, Hoffman Estates, Inc. (1982), 455 U.S. 489, 498 , 71 L. 1985(Village of Hoffman Estates v. Flip-side, Hoffman Estates, Inc. (1982), 455 U.S. 489, 498 , 71 L. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
People v. Evans
green
1 sentence1954(People v. Evans, 412 Ill. 616 .) This mandate whs complied with, and Evans, hereafter referred to as defendant, is before us and again seeking a review of the order denying him post-conviction relief. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Jennings v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1952In People v. Jennings, 411 Ill. 21 , which was decided subsequent to the hearing here involved, this court construed the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104 , 96 L. ed. 105, 72 S. Ct. 123 , as holding that an inquiry into a petition meeting the requirements of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act may not be foreclosed by a mechanical application of the doctrine of res judicata. 1952In People v. Jennings, 411 Ill. 21 , which was decided subsequent to the hearing here involved, this court construed the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104 , 96 L. ed. 105, 72 S. Ct. 123 , as holding that an inquiry into a petition meeting the requirements of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act may not be foreclosed by a mechanical application of the doctrine of res judicata. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
People v. Jennings
green
1 sentence1952In People v. Jennings, 411 Ill. 21 , which was decided subsequent to the hearing here involved, this court construed the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104 , 96 L. ed. 105, 72 S. Ct. 123 , as holding that an inquiry into a petition meeting the requirements of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act may not be foreclosed by a mechanical application of the doctrine of res judicata. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.