Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Marriage of Vancuragreen2 sentences2026In re Marriage of Vancura, 356 Ill. 2023In re Marriage of Vancura, 356 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
In re Marriage of Hamiltongreen2 sentences2026In re 18 Marriage of Hamilton, 2019 IL App (5th) 170295, ¶ 73 (citing 750 ILCS 5/503(d)(2)(i)). 2023In re Marriage of Hamilton, 2019 IL App (5th) 170295, ¶ 77 . | 1 | 2 |
In Re Marriage of Awangreen1 sentence2022See id.; In re Marriage of Dhillon, 2014 IL App (3d) 130653, ¶ 36 ; accord In re Marriage of Awan, 388 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Marriage of Schneeweis
green
2 sentences2023Dissipation is defined as the “ ‘use of marital property for the sole benefit of one of the spouses for a purpose unrelated to the marriage at a time that the marriage is undergoing an irreconcilable breakdown.’ ” Id. (citing In re Marriage of O’Neill, 138 Ill. 2d 487 (1990)). ¶ 65 Pursuant to section 503(d)(2)(i) of the Act, “a notice of intent to claim dissipation shall be given no later than 60 days before trial or 30 days after discovery closes, whichever is later.” 750 ILCS 503(d)(2)(i) (West 2020). 2016Around the same time, Andrew confirmed that he was having an affair. -5- 2016 IL App (2d) 140147 ¶ 22 In June 2011, the trial court entered an agreed order embodying the parties’ agreement that Laurie would have sole legal custody of the children and establishing the parenting time of both parties. ¶ 23 In March 2012, Laurie served Andrew with a notice of intent to claim dissipation. ¶ 24 Trial of the remaining issues in the dissolution commenced on May 31, 2012, and continued for portions of June 1, August 24, and November 13, 14, and 16, 2012. | 2 | 2016–2023 |
In Re Marriage of Toth
green
2 sentences2019The statute requires that the notice include “an identification of the property dissipated.” Id. § 503(d)(2)(ii). 2019The statute requires that the notice include "an identification of the property dissipated." Id. § 503(d)(2)(ii). | 2 | 2019–2019 |
In Re Marriage of O'Neill
green
1 sentence2023Dissipation is defined as the “ ‘use of marital property for the sole benefit of one of the spouses for a purpose unrelated to the marriage at a time that the marriage is undergoing an irreconcilable breakdown.’ ” Id. (citing In re Marriage of O’Neill, 138 Ill. 2d 487 (1990)). ¶ 65 Pursuant to section 503(d)(2)(i) of the Act, “a notice of intent to claim dissipation shall be given no later than 60 days before trial or 30 days after discovery closes, whichever is later.” 750 ILCS 503(d)(2)(i) (West 2020). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In Re Marriage of Holthaus
green
1 sentence2022Id. ¶ 50 To present a prima facie case of dissipation, Section 503(d)(2) of the IMDMA provides as follows: “(2) the dissipation by each party of the marital property, provided that a party's claim of dissipation is subject to the following conditions: (i) a notice of intent to claim dissipation shall be given no later than 60 days before trial or 30 days after discovery closes, whichever is later; (ii) the notice of intent to claim dissipation shall contain, at a minimum, a date or period of time during which the marriage began undergoing an irretrievable - 33 - 2022 IL App (2d) 210370-U break | 1 | 2022–2022 |
In re Marriage of Dhillon
green
1 sentence2022See id.; In re Marriage of Dhillon, 2014 IL App (3d) 130653, ¶ 36 ; accord In re Marriage of Awan, 388 Ill. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Laskowski
green
1 sentence2020Id. ¶ 88 Dissipation claims are governed by section 503(d) of the Act, which provides that, when determining the disposition of marital property, the circuit court should consider all relevant factors, including “(2) the dissipation by each party of the marital property, provided that a party’s claim of dissipation is subject to the following conditions: (i) a notice of intent to claim dissipation shall be given no later than 60 days before trial or 30 days after discovery closes, whichever is later; 31 No. 1-18-2512 (ii) the notice of intent to claim dissipation shall contain, at a minimum, a | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.