OSAD Finley motion (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

OSAD Finley motion in Illinois

8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2019–2026 6 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Baileygreen
ill · 2014 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023Bailey, 2014 IL 115459, ¶ 29 (where the trial court lacked jurisdiction over a defendant’s untimely motion, the appellate court “need not dismiss the appeal” but should vacate the circuit court’s judgment and order that the defendant’s motion be dismissed). ¶ 27 CONCLUSION ¶ 28 For the foregoing reasons, this court grants OSAD’s Finley motion to withdraw as counsel due to the meritlessness of this appeal.

11
People v. Grantgreen
illappct · 2020 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022See 2020 IL App (3d) 160758, ¶ 10 .

11
People v. Stoffelgreen
ill · 2010 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020See People v. Stoffel, 239 Ill. 2d 314, 328 (2010). ¶ 27 Finally, in one of the two written responses that the defendant filed with this court in response to OSAD’s Finley motion to withdraw as counsel on appeal, the defendant alleges that trial counsel provided constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to advise him properly in regard to a plea offer that the State allegedly tendered to trial counsel and by mishandling plea negotiations, and the defendant seems to suggest that direct-appeal counsel was ineffective in regard to the issue of trial counsel’s ineffectiveness.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Johnson green
ill · 2021
1 sentence

2026We first note that the defendant’s sentencing order pursuant to his guilty plea does not state that he was required to register as a sex offender for a period of 10 years; as described above, it states that he was required to register as a sex offender “with the proper authority, as directed by the Probation Officer.” Second, as explained above, “registration obligations arising under the Sex Offender Registration Act are collateral consequences that do not confer standing to challenge the underlying conviction under the Act.” Johnson, 2021 IL 125738, ¶ 69 .

12026–2026
People v. Scheurich green
illappct · 2019
1 sentence

2026In the memorandum, OSAD raises a single potential issue in this appeal, namely, whether the circuit court erred in denying the defendant’s “motion for a corrected mittimus.” ¶ 11 The noun “mittimus” has been defined as “ ‘[a] court order or warrant directing a jailer to detain a person until ordered otherwise.’ ” People v. Scheurich, 2019 IL App (4th) 160441 , ¶ 23 (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014)).

12026–2026
Pennsylvania v. Finley green
scotus · 1987
1 sentence

2023The defendant’s appointed attorney on appeal, the Office of the State Appellate Defender (OSAD), has concluded that the instant appeal lacks merit, and on that basis, it has filed 1 with this court a motion to withdraw as counsel (see Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551 (1987)), along with a memorandum of law in support of the motion. ¶3 The defendant has filed pro se a three-page, handwritten response to OSAD’s Finley motion.

12023–2023
Northwestern Illinois Area Agency on Aging v. Basta green
illappct · 2022
1 sentence

2022Northwestern Illinois Area Agency on Aging v. Basta, 2022 IL App (2d) 210234, ¶ 34 . 6

12022–2022
People v. Delton green
ill · 2008
1 sentence

2022Delton, 227 Ill. 2d at 254 . ¶ 18 In his response to OSAD’s Finley motion, defendant contends, for the first time, that trial counsel did not afford him “the opportunity to tender a lesser included offense instruction.” Defendant acknowledges that such an instruction would have undermined the defense’s trial strategy but nevertheless argues that he should have been afforded a chance to request one.

12022–2022
People v. Blancas green
illappct · 2019
1 sentence

2019Therefore I concur only in the result. -9- No. 1-17-1127 No. 1-17-1127 Cite as: People v. Blancas, 2019 IL App (1st) 171127 Decision Under Review: Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, No. 05-CR- 17564; the Hon.

12019–2019

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IL § 725 ILCS 5/122-1 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check