Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kemp v. Majestic Amusement Co.green2 sentences2014App. 3d at 13 (involving a quasi-contract claim against a landlord who neither requested nor agreed to pay for renovation work performed on behalf of a tenant); Kemp, 234 A.2d at 848 (same). 2014App. 3d at 13 (involving a quasi-contract claim against a landlord who neither requested nor agreed to pay for renovation work performed on behalf of a tenant); Kemp, 234 A.2d at 848 (same). | 2 | 2 |
Archon Construction Co. Inc. v. U.S. Shelter, LLCgreen1 sentence2020App. at 360-62 (affirming the dismissal of a plaintiff’s quasi-contract claim where a contract existed between the parties that covered the same subject matter); Archon Construction Co., 2017 IL App (1st) 153409, ¶¶ 46-47, 51 (affirming a trial court’s judgment for the defendants on the plaintiff’s quantum meruit claim where a contract already existed between the parties that covered the same subject matter). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
American Ambassador Casualty Co. v. City of Chicago
green
2 sentences2017Id. at 885 . ¶ 17 In Village of Bloomingdale, our supreme court addressed whether a quasi-contract claim qualifies as a claim asserting a public entity’s liability “based on contract” and thus is excepted from the immunity granted under the Act. 2016Id. at 885 . ¶ 17 In Village of Bloomingdale, our supreme court addressed whether a quasi-contract claim qualifies as a claim asserting a public entity’s liability “based on contract” and thus is excepted from the immunity granted under the Act. | 3 | 2016–2017 |
Village of Bloomingdale v. CDG Enterprises, Inc.
green
2 sentences2017In Village of Bloomingdale, a developer acquired several parcels of land and petitioned the village to annex the land and rezone it for residential use. 196 Ill. 2d at 486 . 2016In Village of Bloomingdale, a developer acquired several parcels of land and petitioned the village to annex the land and rezone it for residential use. 196 Ill. 2d at 486 . | 3 | 2016–2017 |
Stephen L. Winternitz, Inc. v. NAT. BANK OF MONMOUTH
green
2 sentences1998Winternitz, Inc. v. National Bank of Monmouth, 289 Ill. 1998Winternitz, Inc. v. National Bank of Monmouth , 289 Ill. | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.