Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Shumate
green
2 sentences2015Id. at 488-89 . 22 No. 1-13-2046 ¶ 58 Similarly, in this case, we find no indication that the court improperly relied on defendant's prior charges, and in fact, the court specifically indicated that it was not considering any of defendant's arrests of which he had been acquitted. 2015Id. at 488-89 . ¶ 58 Similarly, in this case, we find no indication that the court improperly relied on defendant’s prior charges and, in fact, the court specifically indicated that it was not considering any of defendant’s arrests of which he had been acquitted. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Foucha v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences2003Foucha, 504 U.S. at 80 , 118 L. 2003Foucha, 504 U.S. at 80 , 118 L. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
People v. Wittenmyer
green
2 sentences1994In People v. Wittenmyer (1992), 151 Ill. 2d 175 , 601 N.E.2d 735 , the court reaffirmed the general rule precluding consecutive sentences for offenses which were part of a single course of conduct; however, the court determined that the plain language and legislative history of section 5 — 8—4(a) manifested the legislature’s intent to create an exception to this rule for convictions under Code section 12 — 14. 1994In People v. Wittenmyer (1992), 151 Ill. 2d 175 , 601 N.E.2d 735 , the court reaffirmed the general rule precluding consecutive sentences for offenses which were part of a single course of conduct; however, the court determined that the plain language and legislative history of section 5 — 8—4(a) manifested the legislature’s intent to create an exception to this rule for convictions under Code section 12 — 14. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Kotecki v. Cyclops Welding Corp.
green
2 sentences1993(Kotecki, 146 Ill. 2d at 163 , 585 N.E.2d at 1027 ; Doyle v. Rhodes (1984), 101 Ill. 2d 1 , 461 N.E.2d 382 .) However, to protect the employer’s interest in limiting its liability to its employee, the court adopted the so-called “Minnesota Rule,” which limits an employer’s contribution liability to an amount not greater than its liability under the Workers’ Compensation Act. 1993(Kotecki, 146 Ill. 2d at 163 , 585 N.E.2d at 1027 ; Doyle v. Rhodes (1984), 101 Ill. 2d 1 , 461 N.E.2d 382 .) However, to protect the employer’s interest in limiting its liability to its employee, the court adopted the so-called “Minnesota Rule,” which limits an employer’s contribution liability to an amount not greater than its liability under the Workers’ Compensation Act. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Doyle v. Rhodes
green
2 sentences1993(Kotecki, 146 Ill. 2d at 163 , 585 N.E.2d at 1027 ; Doyle v. Rhodes (1984), 101 Ill. 2d 1 , 461 N.E.2d 382 .) However, to protect the employer’s interest in limiting its liability to its employee, the court adopted the so-called “Minnesota Rule,” which limits an employer’s contribution liability to an amount not greater than its liability under the Workers’ Compensation Act. 1993(Kotecki, 146 Ill. 2d at 163 , 585 N.E.2d at 1027 ; Doyle v. Rhodes (1984), 101 Ill. 2d 1 , 461 N.E.2d 382 .) However, to protect the employer’s interest in limiting its liability to its employee, the court adopted the so-called “Minnesota Rule,” which limits an employer’s contribution liability to an amount not greater than its liability under the Workers’ Compensation Act. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
United States v. Ross
green
2 sentences1984The Court recognized that ‘a person’s expectations of privacy in personal luggage are substantially greater than in an automobile,’ [citation], and noted that the practical problems associated with the temporary detention of a piece of luggage during the period of time necessary to obtain a warrant are significantly less than those associated with the detention of an automobile. [Citation.] In ruling that the warrantless search of the footlocker was unjustified, the Court reaffirmed the general principle that closed packages and containers may not be searched without a warrant. [Citations.] In 1984The Court recognized that ‘a person’s expectations of privacy in personal luggage are substantially greater than in an automobile,’ [citation], and noted that the practical problems associated with the temporary detention of a piece of luggage during the period of time necessary to obtain a warrant are significantly less than those associated with the detention of an automobile. [Citation.] In ruling that the warrantless search of the footlocker was unjustified, the Court reaffirmed the general principle that closed packages and containers may not be searched without a warrant. [Citations.] In | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Iser Electric Co. v. Fossier Builders, Ltd.
green
2 sentences1983In reversing the trial court’s denial of a homeowners’ motion, this court reaffirmed the general rule that agreements to arbitrate will be enforced despite pending multiparty litigation. 84 Ill. 1983App. 3d 161,166 , 405 N.E.2d 439, 442 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.