Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Riley v. Jones Brothers Construction Co.green2 sentences2024“Where[, as here,] computer- generated records are involved, the proponent must show that ‘the equipment which produced the record is recognized as standard, the entries were made in the regular course of business at or reasonably near the happening of the event recorded and the sources of information, method and time of preparation were such as to indicate their trustworthiness and to justify their admission.” U.S. Bank, National Association v. Avdic, 2014 IL App (1st) 121759, ¶ 25 (quoting Riley v. Jones Brother Construction Co., 198 Ill. 2019April 26, 2012) provides for the admission of records of regularly conducted activity where the records consist of a: “memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts [or] events *** made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity, and if it was the regular practice of that business activity to make the memorandum, report, record or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness.” -9- No. 1-18-0385 Where computer-generated | 7 | 7 |
US Bank v. Avdicgreen2 sentences2024“Where[, as here,] computer- generated records are involved, the proponent must show that ‘the equipment which produced the record is recognized as standard, the entries were made in the regular course of business at or reasonably near the happening of the event recorded and the sources of information, method and time of preparation were such as to indicate their trustworthiness and to justify their admission.” U.S. Bank, National Association v. Avdic, 2014 IL App (1st) 121759, ¶ 25 (quoting Riley v. Jones Brother Construction Co., 198 Ill. 2021In order for computer-generated records to be deemed admissible the proponent must show “the equipment which produced the record is recognized as standard, the entries were made in the regular course of business at or reasonably near the happening of the event recorded and the sources of information, method and time of preparation were such as to indicate their trustworthiness and to justify their admission.” US Bank, National Ass’n v. Avdic, 2014 IL App (1st) 121759, ¶ 25 (quoting Riley v. Jones Bros. | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Grand Liquor Co. v. Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences1990(Grand Liquor Co. v. Department of Revenue (1977), 67 Ill. 2d 195, 202 , 367 N.E.2d 1238 ; Eastman v. Department of Public Aid (1989), 178 Ill. 1990(Grand Liquor Co. v. Department of Revenue (1977), 67 Ill. 2d 195, 202 , 367 N.E.2d 1238 ; Eastman v. Department of Public Aid (1989), 178 Ill. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Eastman v. Department of Public Aid
green
1 sentence1990(Grand Liquor Co. v. Department of Revenue (1977), 67 Ill. 2d 195, 202 , 367 N.E.2d 1238 ; Eastman v. Department of Public Aid (1989), 178 Ill. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.