Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Accardigreen2 sentences2019Thus, '[t]he government cannot search a home and its curtilage absent a warrant or some exception to the warrant requirement.' People v. Pitman , 211 Ill. 2d 502 , 518[ 286 Ill.Dec. 36 , 813 N.E.2d 93 , 104] (2004) ; see also People v. Accardi , 284 Ill. 2019Thus, ‘[t]he government cannot search a home and its curtilage absent a warrant or some exception to the warrant requirement.’ People v. Pitman, 211 Ill. 2d 502, 518 [, 813 N.E.2d 93, 104 ] (2004); see also People v. Accardi, 284 Ill. | 4 | 4 |
People v. Pitmangreen2 sentences2019Therefore, "[t]he government cannot search a home and its curtilage absent a warrant or some exception to the warrant requirement." Pitman , 211 Ill. 2d at 518 , 286 Ill.Dec. 36 , 813 N.E.2d 93 . ¶ 20 K.M. contends that his arrest was due to law enforcement's exploitation of illegally obtained evidence. 2019Therefore, "[t]he government cannot search a home and its curtilage absent a warrant or some exception to the warrant requirement." Pitman , 211 Ill. 2d at 518 , 286 Ill.Dec. 36 , 813 N.E.2d 93 . ¶ 20 K.M. contends that his arrest was due to law enforcement's exploitation of illegally obtained evidence. | 3 | 6 |
People v. Hassangreen2 sentences2021See Hassan, 253 Ill. 2021See Hassan, 253 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Valle
green
1 sentence2015As the State also argues, because the garage was within the curtilage of the residence, the search of the garage would have been authorized even had the warrant not mentioned it at all. -6- 2015 IL App (2d) 131319 search a home and its curtilage absent a warrant or some exception to the warrant requirement.” People v. Pitman, 211 Ill. 2d 502, 518 (2004); see also People v. Accardi, 284 Ill. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.