8 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Delta Tau Delta, Beta Alpha Chapter v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2010It therefore applied the totality of the cireumstances test, which " 'requires landowners to take reasonable precautions to prevent foreseeable eriminal actions against invitees.'" 716 N.E.2d at 605 (quoting Delta Tau Delta v. Johnson, 712 N.E.2d 968, 973 (Ind. 1999)). 2010Under this test, "'a court considers all of the circumstances surrounding an event, including the nature, condition, and location of the land, as well as prior similar incidents, to determine whether a criminal act was foreseeable" 716 N.E.2d at 605 -06 (quoting 712 N.E.2d at 972 ). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Glassgreen1 sentence2010The dissent maintains that "the fact that the tipster's identity was known to police was sufficient, by itself, to justify Officer Cantrell's stop." But this contention is contrary to our opinion in State v. Glass, 769 N.E.2d 639, 643 (Ind.Ct.App.2002), trans. denied, where we recognized that, "The fact that a named caller with an untested reputation called the police does not in itself establish reasonable suspicion." Indeed, both the United States Supreme Court and the Indiana Supreme Court have consistently held that the totality of the cireumstances test applies to a determination of reaso | 1 | 1 |
Kellems v. Stategreen1 sentence2010The dissent's reliance on Kellems v. State, 842 N.E.2d 352, 355 (Ind.2006), rev'd on reh'g on other grounds, 849 N.E.2d 1110 (Ind.2006), also goes too far. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Scheibelhutgreen1 sentence2002Callahan, 719 N.E.2d at 435 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (citing State v. Scheibelhut, 673 N.E.2d 821, 824 (Ind.Ct.App.1996)). | 1 | 1 |
Callahan v. Stategreen1 sentence2002Callahan, 719 N.E.2d at 435 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (citing State v. Scheibelhut, 673 N.E.2d 821, 824 (Ind.Ct.App.1996)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Neeley v. State
green
2 sentences1986It should therefore be governed by the totality of the cireumstances standard set forth in Neeley v. State (1978), 269 Ind. 588 , 382 N.E.2d 714 . 1986It should therefore be governed by the totality of the cireumstances standard set forth in Neeley v. State (1978), 269 Ind. 588 , 382 N.E.2d 714 . | 2 | 1986–1986 |
Kellems v. State
green
1 sentence2010The dissent's reliance on Kellems v. State, 842 N.E.2d 352, 355 (Ind.2006), rev'd on reh'g on other grounds, 849 N.E.2d 1110 (Ind.2006), also goes too far. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Hayden v. University of Notre Dame
green
2 sentences2010It therefore applied the totality of the cireumstances test, which " 'requires landowners to take reasonable precautions to prevent foreseeable eriminal actions against invitees.'" 716 N.E.2d at 605 (quoting Delta Tau Delta v. Johnson, 712 N.E.2d 968, 973 (Ind. 1999)). 2010Under this test, "'a court considers all of the circumstances surrounding an event, including the nature, condition, and location of the land, as well as prior similar incidents, to determine whether a criminal act was foreseeable" 716 N.E.2d at 605 -06 (quoting 712 N.E.2d at 972 ). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Camp v. State
green
1 sentence2002Id. at 304 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Bivins v. State
green
1 sentence1995Bivins v. State (1994), Ind., 642 N.E.2d 928, 936 , reh'g denied. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Johnson v. State
green
1 sentence1995Johnson v. State (1992), Ind., 584 N.E.2d 1092, 1098-99 , (citations omitted), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 155 , 121 L.Ed.2d 105 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Cassell v. Norris
green
1 sentence1995Johnson v. State (1992), Ind., 584 N.E.2d 1092, 1098-99 , (citations omitted), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 155 , 121 L.Ed.2d 105 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Sherwood v. State
neutral
1 sentence1986Cf. Sherwood v. State (1985), Ind., 485 N.E.2d 97 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.