Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kaisergreen2 sentences2018See State v. Kaiser , No. 102,845, 2010 WL 3853206 , at *2 (Kan. 2015State v. Kaiser, No. 102, 845, 2010 WL 3853206, at *2 (Kan. | 3 | 3 |
In re Arabiagreen2 sentences2013See In re Millett, 291 Kan. 369, 373, 377, 380 , 241 P.3d 35 (2010) (approving panel’s finding of KRPC 8.4 violation when attorney lied to a detective while representing a client); In re Arabia, 283 Kan. 851, 857, 860 , 156 P.3d 652 (2007) (approving panel’s finding of a KRPC 8.4 violation when attorney provided false information to a detective while representing a client). 2013See In re Millett, 291 Kan. 369, 373, 377, 380 , 241 P.3d 35 (2010) (approving panel’s finding of KRPC 8.4 violation when attorney lied to a detective while representing a client); In re Arabia, 283 Kan. 851, 857, 860 , 156 P.3d 652 (2007) (approving panel’s finding of a KRPC 8.4 violation when attorney provided false information to a detective while representing a client). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Millettgreen2 sentences2013See In re Millett, 291 Kan. 369, 373, 377, 380 , 241 P.3d 35 (2010) (approving panel’s finding of KRPC 8.4 violation when attorney lied to a detective while representing a client); In re Arabia, 283 Kan. 851, 857, 860 , 156 P.3d 652 (2007) (approving panel’s finding of a KRPC 8.4 violation when attorney provided false information to a detective while representing a client). 2013See In re Millett, 291 Kan. 369, 373, 377, 380 , 241 P.3d 35 (2010) (approving panel’s finding of KRPC 8.4 violation when attorney lied to a detective while representing a client); In re Arabia, 283 Kan. 851, 857, 860 , 156 P.3d 652 (2007) (approving panel’s finding of a KRPC 8.4 violation when attorney provided false information to a detective while representing a client). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Mustafa Abdulla Abu-Isbagreen2 sentences1999See State v. Abu-Isba, 235 Kan. 851, 859 , 685 P.2d 856 (1984); State v. Williams, 228 Kan. 723, 732 , 621 P.2d 423 (1980); State v. Henderson, 226 Kan. 726, 735 , 603 P.2d 613 (1979). 1999See State v. Abu-Isba, 235 Kan. 851, 859 , 685 P.2d 856 (1984); State v. Williams, 228 Kan. 723, 732 , 621 P.2d 423 (1980); State v. Henderson, 226 Kan. 726, 735 , 603 P.2d 613 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
Ayers v. Christiansengreen2 sentences1994See, e.g., Ayers v. Christiansen, 222 Kan. 225 , 564 P.2d 458 (1977) (introduction of evidence relating to the defendant’s insurance status in regard to the issue of fault); State v. Gregory, 218 Kan. 180, 188 , 542 P.2d 1051 (1975) (défendant’s sex life or his quarrels with his paramour “wholly irrelevant” to his professed fear of knives and prejudicial); Caylor v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Rly. 1994See, e.g., Ayers v. Christiansen, 222 Kan. 225 , 564 P.2d 458 (1977) (introduction of evidence relating to the defendant’s insurance status in regard to the issue of fault); State v. Gregory, 218 Kan. 180, 188 , 542 P.2d 1051 (1975) (défendant’s sex life or his quarrels with his paramour “wholly irrelevant” to his professed fear of knives and prejudicial); Caylor v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Rly. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Sprague
green
2 sentences2026State v. Sprague, 303 Kan. 418, 428 , 362 P.3d 828 (2015); see also State v. Marks, No. 126,492, 2025 WL 2993738 , at *12 (Kan. 2026State v. Sprague, 303 Kan. 418, 428 , 362 P.3d 828 (2015); see also State v. Marks, No. 126,492, 2025 WL 2993738 , at *12 (Kan. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Quested
green
2 sentences2018This court has found the doctrine of stare decisis to be "particularly compelling in cases where ... the legislature is free to alter a statute in response to court precedent with which it disagrees but declines to do so." Quested , 302 Kan. at 278 , 352 P.3d 553 . 2018This court has found the doctrine of stare decisis to be "particularly compelling in cases where ... the legislature is free to alter a statute in response to court precedent with which it disagrees but declines to do so." Quested , 302 Kan. at 278 , 352 P.3d 553 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Henderson
green
2 sentences1999See State v. Abu-Isba, 235 Kan. 851, 859 , 685 P.2d 856 (1984); State v. Williams, 228 Kan. 723, 732 , 621 P.2d 423 (1980); State v. Henderson, 226 Kan. 726, 735 , 603 P.2d 613 (1979). 1999See State v. Abu-Isba, 235 Kan. 851, 859 , 685 P.2d 856 (1984); State v. Williams, 228 Kan. 723, 732 , 621 P.2d 423 (1980); State v. Henderson, 226 Kan. 726, 735 , 603 P.2d 613 (1979). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences1999See State v. Abu-Isba, 235 Kan. 851, 859 , 685 P.2d 856 (1984); State v. Williams, 228 Kan. 723, 732 , 621 P.2d 423 (1980); State v. Henderson, 226 Kan. 726, 735 , 603 P.2d 613 (1979). 1999See State v. Abu-Isba, 235 Kan. 851, 859 , 685 P.2d 856 (1984); State v. Williams, 228 Kan. 723, 732 , 621 P.2d 423 (1980); State v. Henderson, 226 Kan. 726, 735 , 603 P.2d 613 (1979). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Gregory
green
2 sentences1994See, e.g., Ayers v. Christiansen, 222 Kan. 225 , 564 P.2d 458 (1977) (introduction of evidence relating to the defendant’s insurance status in regard to the issue of fault); State v. Gregory, 218 Kan. 180, 188 , 542 P.2d 1051 (1975) (défendant’s sex life or his quarrels with his paramour “wholly irrelevant” to his professed fear of knives and prejudicial); Caylor v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Rly. 1994See, e.g., Ayers v. Christiansen, 222 Kan. 225 , 564 P.2d 458 (1977) (introduction of evidence relating to the defendant’s insurance status in regard to the issue of fault); State v. Gregory, 218 Kan. 180, 188 , 542 P.2d 1051 (1975) (défendant’s sex life or his quarrels with his paramour “wholly irrelevant” to his professed fear of knives and prejudicial); Caylor v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Rly. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.