manifest rule in Kansas

1991This is manifest by the rule itself, by the express terms of the statute, and by our decisions which hold that in order to obtain an adjudication of any question of law under the declaratory judgment act, an actual controversy must exist ( Kittredge v. Boyd, 137 Kan. 241, 242 , 20 P.2d 811 ; Klein v. Bredehoft, 147 Kan. 71, 73 , 75 P.2d 232 ; City of Cherryvale v. Wilson, 153 Kan. 505, 509 , 112 P.2d 111 ; State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 163 Kan. 187 , 182 P.2d 127 ), and when any legal question becomes moot, judicial action ceases ( State, ex *669 rel., v. Insurance Co., 88 Kan. 9, 10

1991This is manifest by the rule itself, by the express terms of the statute, and by our decisions which hold that in order to obtain an adjudication of any question of law under the declaratory judgment act, an actual controversy must exist ( Kittredge v. Boyd, 137 Kan. 241, 242 , 20 P.2d 811 ; Klein v. Bredehoft, 147 Kan. 71, 73 , 75 P.2d 232 ; City of Cherryvale v. Wilson, 153 Kan. 505, 509 , 112 P.2d 111 ; State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 163 Kan. 187 , 182 P.2d 127 ), and when any legal question becomes moot, judicial action ceases ( State, ex *669 rel., v. Insurance Co., 88 Kan. 9, 10

1991This is manifest by the rule itself, by the express terms of the statute, and by our decisions which hold that in order to obtain an adjudication of any question of law under the declaratory judgment act, an actual controversy must exist ( Kittredge v. Boyd, 137 Kan. 241, 242 , 20 P.2d 811 ; Klein v. Bredehoft, 147 Kan. 71, 73 , 75 P.2d 232 ; City of Cherryvale v. Wilson, 153 Kan. 505, 509 , 112 P.2d 111 ; State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 163 Kan. 187 , 182 P.2d 127 ), and when any legal question becomes moot, judicial action ceases ( State, ex *669 rel., v. Insurance Co., 88 Kan. 9, 10

1991This is manifest by the rule itself, by the express terms of the statute, and by our decisions which hold that in order to obtain an adjudication of any question of law under the declaratory judgment act, an actual controversy must exist ( Kittredge v. Boyd, 137 Kan. 241, 242 , 20 P.2d 811 ; Klein v. Bredehoft, 147 Kan. 71, 73 , 75 P.2d 232 ; City of Cherryvale v. Wilson, 153 Kan. 505, 509 , 112 P.2d 111 ; State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 163 Kan. 187 , 182 P.2d 127 ), and when any legal question becomes moot, judicial action ceases ( State, ex *669 rel., v. Insurance Co., 88 Kan. 9, 10

1991This is manifest by the rule itself, by the express terms of the statute, and by our decisions which hold that in order to obtain an adjudication of any question of law under the declaratory judgment act, an actual controversy must exist ( Kittredge v. Boyd, 137 Kan. 241, 242 , 20 P.2d 811 ; Klein v. Bredehoft, 147 Kan. 71, 73 , 75 P.2d 232 ; City of Cherryvale v. Wilson, 153 Kan. 505, 509 , 112 P.2d 111 ; State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 163 Kan. 187 , 182 P.2d 127 ), and when any legal question becomes moot, judicial action ceases ( State, ex *669 rel., v. Insurance Co., 88 Kan. 9, 10

1991This is manifest by the rule itself, by the express terms of the statute, and by our decisions which hold that in order to obtain an adjudication of any question of law under the declaratory judgment act, an actual controversy must exist ( Kittredge v. Boyd, 137 Kan. 241, 242 , 20 P.2d 811 ; Klein v. Bredehoft, 147 Kan. 71, 73 , 75 P.2d 232 ; City of Cherryvale v. Wilson, 153 Kan. 505, 509 , 112 P.2d 111 ; State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 163 Kan. 187 , 182 P.2d 127 ), and when any legal question becomes moot, judicial action ceases ( State, ex *669 rel., v. Insurance Co., 88 Kan. 9, 10

1991This is manifest by the rule itself, by the express terms of the statute, and by our decisions which hold that in order to obtain an adjudication of any question of law under the declaratory judgment act, an actual controversy must exist ( Kittredge v. Boyd, 137 Kan. 241, 242 , 20 P.2d 811 ; Klein v. Bredehoft, 147 Kan. 71, 73 , 75 P.2d 232 ; City of Cherryvale v. Wilson, 153 Kan. 505, 509 , 112 P.2d 111 ; State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 163 Kan. 187 , 182 P.2d 127 ), and when any legal question becomes moot, judicial action ceases ( State, ex *669 rel., v. Insurance Co., 88 Kan. 9, 10

1991This is manifest by the rule itself, by the express terms of the statute, and by our decisions which hold that in order to obtain an adjudication of any question of law under the declaratory judgment act, an actual controversy must exist ( Kittredge v. Boyd, 137 Kan. 241, 242 , 20 P.2d 811 ; Klein v. Bredehoft, 147 Kan. 71, 73 , 75 P.2d 232 ; City of Cherryvale v. Wilson, 153 Kan. 505, 509 , 112 P.2d 111 ; State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 163 Kan. 187 , 182 P.2d 127 ), and when any legal question becomes moot, judicial action ceases ( State, ex *669 rel., v. Insurance Co., 88 Kan. 9, 10

1991This is manifest by the rule itself, by the express terms of the statute, and by our decisions which hold that in order to obtain an adjudication of any question of law under the declaratory judgment act, an actual controversy must exist ( Kittredge v. Boyd, 137 Kan. 241, 242 , 20 P.2d 811 ; Klein v. Bredehoft, 147 Kan. 71, 73 , 75 P.2d 232 ; City of Cherryvale v. Wilson, 153 Kan. 505, 509 , 112 P.2d 111 ; State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 163 Kan. 187 , 182 P.2d 127 ), and when any legal question becomes moot, judicial action ceases ( State, ex *669 rel., v. Insurance Co., 88 Kan. 9, 10

1991This is manifest by the rule itself, by the express terms of the statute, and by our decisions which hold that in order to obtain an adjudication of any question of law under the declaratory judgment act, an actual controversy must exist ( Kittredge v. Boyd, 137 Kan. 241, 242 , 20 P.2d 811 ; Klein v. Bredehoft, 147 Kan. 71, 73 , 75 P.2d 232 ; City of Cherryvale v. Wilson, 153 Kan. 505, 509 , 112 P.2d 111 ; State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 163 Kan. 187 , 182 P.2d 127 ), and when any legal question becomes moot, judicial action ceases ( State, ex *669 rel., v. Insurance Co., 88 Kan. 9, 10

1991This is manifest by the rule itself, by the express terms of the statute, and by our decisions which hold that in order to obtain an adjudication of any question of law under the declaratory judgment act, an actual controversy must exist ( Kittredge v. Boyd, 137 Kan. 241, 242 , 20 P.2d 811 ; Klein v. Bredehoft, 147 Kan. 71, 73 , 75 P.2d 232 ; City of Cherryvale v. Wilson, 153 Kan. 505, 509 , 112 P.2d 111 ; State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 163 Kan. 187 , 182 P.2d 127 ), and when any legal question becomes moot, judicial action ceases ( State, ex *669 rel., v. Insurance Co., 88 Kan. 9, 10

1991This is manifest by the rule itself, by the express terms of the statute, and by our decisions which hold that in order to obtain an adjudication of any question of law under the declaratory judgment act, an actual controversy must exist ( Kittredge v. Boyd, 137 Kan. 241, 242 , 20 P.2d 811 ; Klein v. Bredehoft, 147 Kan. 71, 73 , 75 P.2d 232 ; City of Cherryvale v. Wilson, 153 Kan. 505, 509 , 112 P.2d 111 ; State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 163 Kan. 187 , 182 P.2d 127 ), and when any legal question becomes moot, judicial action ceases ( State, ex *669 rel., v. Insurance Co., 88 Kan. 9, 10

1994(Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n v. Windhorst, 134 Kan. 736 , 8 P.2d 392 ; Schwab v. Nordstrom, 138 Kan. 497 , 27 P.2d 242 ; Farmer v. Central Mut.

1994(Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n v. Windhorst, 134 Kan. 736 , 8 P.2d 392 ; Schwab v. Nordstrom, 138 Kan. 497 , 27 P.2d 242 ; Farmer v. Central Mut.

1994(Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n v. Windhorst, 134 Kan. 736 , 8 P.2d 392 ; Schwab v. Nordstrom, 138 Kan. 497 , 27 P.2d 242 ; Farmer v. Central Mut.

1994(Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n v. Windhorst, 134 Kan. 736 , 8 P.2d 392 ; Schwab v. Nordstrom, 138 Kan. 497 , 27 P.2d 242 ; Farmer v. Central Mut.

1932“As one item of credit was not allowed by the jury to the defendants, a modification of the judgment to that extent is directed.” (Schlesener v. Mott, 107 Kan. 41 , syl. ¶¶ 3, 5, 190 Pac. 745 .) Appellant further urges that aside from the question of estoppel and fraud alleged by the defendant the answers of the jury to the special questions show that the plaintiff entirely failed to establish its right to recover on the contract of the defendant.

1932“As one item of credit was not allowed by the jury to the defendants, a modification of the judgment to that extent is directed.” (Schlesener v. Mott, 107 Kan. 41 , syl. ¶¶ 3, 5, 190 Pac. 745 .) Appellant further urges that aside from the question of estoppel and fraud alleged by the defendant the answers of the jury to the special questions show that the plaintiff entirely failed to establish its right to recover on the contract of the defendant.

1911“Where the will itself shows that there has been a mistake in specifically describing land which is also designated by a general description, the will may be made to operate upon the land intended to be specifically described, but which, by mistake, is incorrectly described in the specific description which follows the general.” (Pocock et al. v. Redinger, 108 Ind. 573, 575 .) The fact that the will assigns to one of the two sons forty acres designated as the south half of a tract erroneously described, and to the other the north half of a tract indicated by the same erroneous description, mak

1910Whether the defendant was acting as a “bootlegger,” as the defendant was in The State v. Green, 69 Kan. 865 , or simply purchased liquor as the agent of those who sent him for that purpose, was the question to be determined, and he was entitled to all the inferences which the jury could rightly draw from the evidence of his good repute.