manifest error (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

manifest error in New Jersey

6 New Jersey opinions name it 1 courts 1954–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Hisenaj v. Kuehnergreen
nj · 2008 · cited in 2 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2014–2021
2 sentences

2021Hisenaj, 194 N.J. at 20 (quoting Torres, 183 N.J. at 572 ).

2014Hisenaj v. Kuehner, 194 N.J. 6, 20 (2008).

12
Milne v. Goldenberggreen
njsuperctappdiv · 2012 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019A manifest error or injustice occurs when the motion judge's decision is "made without a rational explanation, inexplicably depart[s] from established policies, or rest[s] on an impermissible basis." Milne v. Goldenberg, 428 N.J.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Torres green
nj · 2005
1 sentence

2021Hisenaj, 194 N.J. at 20 (quoting Torres, 183 N.J. at 572 ).

12021–2021
Sherlock v. State green
nj · 1897
1 sentence

1957Sherlock v. State, 60 N.J.L. 31 ( Sup. Ct. 1897); State v. MacQueen, 69 N.J.L. 522 ( Sup. Ct. 1903); State of New Jersey v. Tapack, 78 N.J.L. 208 ( Sup. Ct. 1909); State v. De Geralmo, 83 N.J.L. 135 ( Sup. Ct. 1912); State v. Diamond, 84 N.J.L. 17 ( Sup. Ct. 1913); State v. Parks, 96 N.J.L. 360 ( Sup. Ct. 1921); State v. Kaplan, 115 N.J.L. 374 ( Sup. Ct. 1935).

11957–1957
State v. MacQueen green
nj · 1903
1 sentence

1957Sherlock v. State, 60 N.J.L. 31 ( Sup. Ct. 1897); State v. MacQueen, 69 N.J.L. 522 ( Sup. Ct. 1903); State of New Jersey v. Tapack, 78 N.J.L. 208 ( Sup. Ct. 1909); State v. De Geralmo, 83 N.J.L. 135 ( Sup. Ct. 1912); State v. Diamond, 84 N.J.L. 17 ( Sup. Ct. 1913); State v. Parks, 96 N.J.L. 360 ( Sup. Ct. 1921); State v. Kaplan, 115 N.J.L. 374 ( Sup. Ct. 1935).

11957–1957
State v. Tapack green
nj · 1909
1 sentence

1957Sherlock v. State, 60 N.J.L. 31 ( Sup. Ct. 1897); State v. MacQueen, 69 N.J.L. 522 ( Sup. Ct. 1903); State of New Jersey v. Tapack, 78 N.J.L. 208 ( Sup. Ct. 1909); State v. De Geralmo, 83 N.J.L. 135 ( Sup. Ct. 1912); State v. Diamond, 84 N.J.L. 17 ( Sup. Ct. 1913); State v. Parks, 96 N.J.L. 360 ( Sup. Ct. 1921); State v. Kaplan, 115 N.J.L. 374 ( Sup. Ct. 1935).

11957–1957
State v. Diamond neutral
nj · 1913
1 sentence

1957Sherlock v. State, 60 N.J.L. 31 ( Sup. Ct. 1897); State v. MacQueen, 69 N.J.L. 522 ( Sup. Ct. 1903); State of New Jersey v. Tapack, 78 N.J.L. 208 ( Sup. Ct. 1909); State v. De Geralmo, 83 N.J.L. 135 ( Sup. Ct. 1912); State v. Diamond, 84 N.J.L. 17 ( Sup. Ct. 1913); State v. Parks, 96 N.J.L. 360 ( Sup. Ct. 1921); State v. Kaplan, 115 N.J.L. 374 ( Sup. Ct. 1935).

11957–1957
State v. DeGeralmo green
nj · 1912
1 sentence

1957Sherlock v. State, 60 N.J.L. 31 ( Sup. Ct. 1897); State v. MacQueen, 69 N.J.L. 522 ( Sup. Ct. 1903); State of New Jersey v. Tapack, 78 N.J.L. 208 ( Sup. Ct. 1909); State v. De Geralmo, 83 N.J.L. 135 ( Sup. Ct. 1912); State v. Diamond, 84 N.J.L. 17 ( Sup. Ct. 1913); State v. Parks, 96 N.J.L. 360 ( Sup. Ct. 1921); State v. Kaplan, 115 N.J.L. 374 ( Sup. Ct. 1935).

11957–1957
State v. Parks green
nj · 1921
1 sentence

1957Sherlock v. State, 60 N.J.L. 31 ( Sup. Ct. 1897); State v. MacQueen, 69 N.J.L. 522 ( Sup. Ct. 1903); State of New Jersey v. Tapack, 78 N.J.L. 208 ( Sup. Ct. 1909); State v. De Geralmo, 83 N.J.L. 135 ( Sup. Ct. 1912); State v. Diamond, 84 N.J.L. 17 ( Sup. Ct. 1913); State v. Parks, 96 N.J.L. 360 ( Sup. Ct. 1921); State v. Kaplan, 115 N.J.L. 374 ( Sup. Ct. 1935).

11957–1957
State v. Kaplan neutral
nj · 1935
1 sentence

1957Sherlock v. State, 60 N.J.L. 31 ( Sup. Ct. 1897); State v. MacQueen, 69 N.J.L. 522 ( Sup. Ct. 1903); State of New Jersey v. Tapack, 78 N.J.L. 208 ( Sup. Ct. 1909); State v. De Geralmo, 83 N.J.L. 135 ( Sup. Ct. 1912); State v. Diamond, 84 N.J.L. 17 ( Sup. Ct. 1913); State v. Parks, 96 N.J.L. 360 ( Sup. Ct. 1921); State v. Kaplan, 115 N.J.L. 374 ( Sup. Ct. 1935).

11957–1957
536 Broad Street Corp. v. Valco Mortgage Co. neutral
njsuperctappdiv · 1950
1 sentence

1955Corp. v. Valco Mortgage Co., Inc., 7 N.J.

11955–1955
State v. Picciotti green
nj · 1953
1 sentence

1954This was manifest error within State v. Picciotti, supra , and cannot stand.

11954–1954

Where else courts name it

LA 5746 (1912–2026) WA 475 (1920–2026) IL 309 (1886–2026) MS 291 (1914–2026) VA 42 (1885–2026) RI 37 (1974–2020) WI 37 (1955–2026) PA 33 (1893–2026) SC 30 (1946–2025) ME 27 (1953–2019) NM 20 (1975–2025) FL 15 (1974–2024) AL 14 (1850–2002) AR 13 (1961–2025) KY 13 (1863–2024) MT 12 (1946–2024) NY 12 (1906–2009) OH 9 (1937–2020) KS 8 (1910–1994) CA 7 (1928–1999) DC 7 (1902–2017) OK 7 (1923–2015) NJ 6 (1954–2021) MO 6 (1894–1992) TX 6 (1871–2006) CO 5 (1894–2018) IA 4 (1908–1991) GA 4 (1894–2025) UT 4 (1988–2002) MA 4 (1942–2013) DE 3 (2019–2024) TN 3 (1967–2017) WY 3 (2021–2023) VI 3 (1999–2013) OR 3 (1896–2017) NV 2 (1930–2020) IN 2 (1970–2017) PR 2 (1912–1917) MD 2 (2010–2016) AZ 2 (2001–2006) VT 2 (2008–2014) MI 2 (1893–1905)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check