Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc.green2 sentences2009See Adams, 07-2110 at p. 10, 983 So.2d at 806 . 2009See Adams, 07-2110 at p. 10, 983 So.2d at 806 . | 1 | 1 |
Shafouk Nor El Din Hamza v. Bourgeoisgreen1 sentence1992App. 5 Cir.1991) the court states the law regarding the exception of no cause of action as follows: As stated by this Court in Shafouk Nor El Din Hamza v. Bourgeois, 493 So.2d 112, 116 (5th Cir.1986): "The peremptory exception of no cause of action raises the issue of whether any remedy is afforded by law for the particular grievance set forth by the plaintiffs. * * * * * * The purpose of the exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the pleadings. | 1 | 1 |
Alfred Lewis, Cross-Appellee v. Timco, Inc. v. Joy Manufacturing, Cross-Appellantgreen1 sentence1991Lewis v. Timco, Inc., 716 F.2d 1425, 1427 (5th Cir.1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
NHUT VAN MAI v. Floyd
green
1 sentence2008In his appellate brief, Mr. Marmet cites Mai v. Floyd, 05-2301 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/6/06) , 951 So.2d 244 , writ denied, 07-581 (La.5/4/07), 956 So.2d 619 , in support of his assertion that the Louisiana legislature changed the law regarding the requirement that a possessor have both good faith and just title to permit tacking. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Mai v. Floyd
neutral
1 sentence2008In his appellate brief, Mr. Marmet cites Mai v. Floyd, 05-2301 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/6/06) , 951 So.2d 244 , writ denied, 07-581 (La.5/4/07), 956 So.2d 619 , in support of his assertion that the Louisiana legislature changed the law regarding the requirement that a possessor have both good faith and just title to permit tacking. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Carpenter
green
1 sentence2002In State v. Carpenter, 390 So.2d 1296 (La.1980), the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the following law regarding a waiver of defendant's right to counsel: The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel depends upon the facts and circumstances surrounding the case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Stobart v. State Through DOTD
green
1 sentence1999LAW The law regarding the standard of appellate review is well settled: A court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury's finding of fact in absence of "manifest error" or unless it is "clearly wrong." Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989); Stobart v. State, Through DOTD, 617 So.2d 880 (La. 1993). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Rosell v. Esco
green
1 sentence1999LAW The law regarding the standard of appellate review is well settled: A court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury's finding of fact in absence of "manifest error" or unless it is "clearly wrong." Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989); Stobart v. State, Through DOTD, 617 So.2d 880 (La. 1993). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries
green
1 sentence1992IMMUNITY The law regarding immunity in § 1983 claims was discussed recently in Moresi, 567 So.2d at 1084 -85 as follows: Although the statute's language does not expressly incorporate any common law immunities, the United States Supreme Court concluded that Congress intended that common law tort principles of immunity should apply to § 1983 actions. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Boudreaux v. American Insurance Company
green
1 sentence1976As we weigh this testimony we must conclude that the Fire Chief was truthful in stating that his investigation revealed a charred pot on the left front burner of the electric stove, which burner control was left in an `on' position." After quoting from Boudreaux v. American Insurance Company, La., 264 So.2d 621 (1972) the applicable law regarding the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, the trial judge then concluded: "As we apply the principles of the Boudreaux case to the facts at hand, we must conclude that the defendants are liable for the damages incurred. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.