8 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cent. La. Elec. Co. v. Pucgreen2 sentences2008In Eagle Water, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Comm'n, XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.1/17/07), 947 So.2d 28 , the Supreme Court noted, The purpose underlying the requirement that an agency must provide a statement of findings as to disputed issues and reasons for its determination is "to enable a reviewing court to determine with, some measure of confidence whether or not the ratemaking authority, which still remains in the Commission, has been exercised in a manner which is not arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable." Id., 947 So.2d at 34 & n. 4, citing, Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Louisiana Public S 2007The purpose underlying the requirement that an agency must provide a statement of findings as to disputed issues and reasons for its determination is “to enable a reviewing court to determine with some measure of confidence whether or not the ratemaking authority, which still remains in the Commission, has been exercised in a manner which is not arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable.” Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Com’n, 578 So.2d 71, 83 (La.1991), quoting Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Comm’n, 437 So.2d 278, 279 (La.1983). . | 3 | 3 |
Gulf States Utilities v. PSCgreen2 sentences2008In Eagle Water, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Comm'n, XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.1/17/07), 947 So.2d 28 , the Supreme Court noted, The purpose underlying the requirement that an agency must provide a statement of findings as to disputed issues and reasons for its determination is "to enable a reviewing court to determine with, some measure of confidence whether or not the ratemaking authority, which still remains in the Commission, has been exercised in a manner which is not arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable." Id., 947 So.2d at 34 & n. 4, citing, Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Louisiana Public S 2007The purpose underlying the requirement that an agency must provide a statement of findings as to disputed issues and reasons for its determination is “to enable a reviewing court to determine with some measure of confidence whether or not the ratemaking authority, which still remains in the Commission, has been exercised in a manner which is not arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable.” Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Com’n, 578 So.2d 71, 83 (La.1991), quoting Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Comm’n, 437 So.2d 278, 279 (La.1983). . | 2 | 2 |
Ortiz v. Barriffegreen1 sentence1995In Ortiz v. Barriffe, 523 So.2d 896, 898 (La.App. *513 4th Cir.), writ denied 531 So.2d 273 (La. 1988), this court reasoned as follows: John Citizen when named a defendant usually reacts with a desire to sue for the insult. | 1 | 1 |
LaCava v. City of New Orleansgreen1 sentence1978As was stated in the case of LaCava v. City of New Orleans, 159 So.2d 362, 364 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1964), “It is not advanced age alone, but rather disability resulting from advanced age (or other cause) which affects the test of care required.” For the above reasons the judgment of the District Court is reversed and it is hereby ordered that plaintiff’s suit be dismissed at her costs, both at trial and on appeal. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Melancon v. Continental Casualty Company
green
2 sentences2008Based on this rationale, we concluded earlier in this opinion that the remark in Melancon [v. Continental Casualty Co., 307 So.2d 308 (La.1975)] precluding the consideration of conduct not on the record in determining if defendant's conduct constituted a waiver was mistaken. 2007Based on this rationale, we concluded earlier in this opinion that the remark in Melancon [ v. Continental Casualty Co., 307 So.2d 308 (La.1975)] precluding the consideration of conduct not on the record in determining if defendant's conduct constituted a waiver was mistaken. | 2 | 2007–2008 |
Eagle Water, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
green
2 sentences2008In Eagle Water, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Comm'n, XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.1/17/07), 947 So.2d 28 , the Supreme Court noted, The purpose underlying the requirement that an agency must provide a statement of findings as to disputed issues and reasons for its determination is "to enable a reviewing court to determine with, some measure of confidence whether or not the ratemaking authority, which still remains in the Commission, has been exercised in a manner which is not arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable." Id., 947 So.2d at 34 & n. 4, citing, Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Louisiana Public S 2008In Eagle Water, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Comm'n, XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.1/17/07), 947 So.2d 28 , the Supreme Court noted, The purpose underlying the requirement that an agency must provide a statement of findings as to disputed issues and reasons for its determination is "to enable a reviewing court to determine with, some measure of confidence whether or not the ratemaking authority, which still remains in the Commission, has been exercised in a manner which is not arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable." Id., 947 So.2d at 34 & n. 4, citing, Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Louisiana Public S | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Ortiz v. Barriffe
green
1 sentence1995In Ortiz v. Barriffe, 523 So.2d 896, 898 (La.App. *513 4th Cir.), writ denied 531 So.2d 273 (La. 1988), this court reasoned as follows: John Citizen when named a defendant usually reacts with a desire to sue for the insult. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Hopkins v. Department of Highways
green
1 sentence1991Hopkins v. Department of Highways, 350 So.2d 1271 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1977). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Allen v. State Bd. of Dentistry
green
1 sentence1991The case cited by Gulf States to support its contention that the combination of prosecutorial and fact-finding functions in one person violates due process, Allen v. Louisiana State Board of Dentistry, 543 So.2d 908 (La.1989), is not comparable to a ratemaking proceeding. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.