8 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Randallgreen1 sentence2013See State v. Randall, 10-1027, p. 3 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/22/11), 69 So.3d 683, 685 ; State v. Wells, 10-1338, p. 9 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/30/11), 64 So.3d 303, 306 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Harpergreen1 sentence1984State v. Burkhalter, 428 So.2d 449, 454-56 (La.1983); State v. Harper, 430 So.2d 627, 633 (La.1983). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Burkhaltergreen1 sentence1984State v. Burkhalter, 428 So.2d 449, 454-56 (La.1983); State v. Harper, 430 So.2d 627, 633 (La.1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Welch
green
1 sentence2015State v. Welch, 11-0274 (La.4/29/11), 60 So.3d 603 ; State v. Banks, 11-961 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/22/12) , 95 So.3d 508 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Banks
neutral
2 sentences2015State v. Welch, 11-0274 (La.4/29/11), 60 So.3d 603 ; State v. Banks, 11-961 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/22/12) , 95 So.3d 508 . 2015State v. Welch, 11-0274 (La.4/29/11), 60 So.3d 603 ; State v. Banks, 11-961 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/22/12) , 95 So.3d 508 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Wells
green
1 sentence2013See State v. Randall, 10-1027, p. 3 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/22/11), 69 So.3d 683, 685 ; State v. Wells, 10-1338, p. 9 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/30/11), 64 So.3d 303, 306 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Holloway v. Arkansas
green
2 sentences2012Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. at 490 , 98 S.Ct. 1173 . | ^Although the transcript of the suppression hearing does not so reflect, counsel was arrested at the Red River Parish courthouse after the conclusion of defendant’s July 16, 2008 hearing on his Motion to Suppress. 2012Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. at 490 , 98 S.Ct. 1173 . | ^Although the transcript of the suppression hearing does not so reflect, counsel was arrested at the Red River Parish courthouse after the conclusion of defendant’s July 16, 2008 hearing on his Motion to Suppress. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Archie
green
1 sentence2011As such, we remand the matter to the trial court so the trial judge can conduct another hearing on the motion to suppress, as was done in State v. Archie, supra. If the trial judge denies the motion again, defendant can appeal the ruling to this Court with a transcript of the proceedings. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Anders v. California
green
2 sentences1997Without a complete record, compliance by appellate counsel with the procedures' outlined in Anders, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , as interpreted by Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 , is impossible. 1997Without a complete record, compliance by appellate counsel with the procedures' outlined in Anders, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , as interpreted by Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 , is impossible. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Benjamin
green
1 sentence1997Without a complete record, compliance by appellate counsel with the procedures' outlined in Anders, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , as interpreted by Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 , is impossible. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Vessell
green
1 sentence1989State v. Vessell, supra. Review of the transcript of the suppression hearing and the trial reveals the trial court's conclusion the statement was freely and voluntarily given is not contrary to the evidence. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Nebar
neutral
1 sentence1988The State then sought writs of review and prohibition in the Louisiana Supreme Court, and on April 29th that Court granted writs and transferred the application, (which included the transcript of the suppression hearing) back to this court for consideration, 523 So.2d 1316 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.