Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ballardgreen2 sentences2025State v. Ballard, 855 S.W.2d 557, 560 (Tenn. 1993). 2011The appellant bears the burden of preparing an adequate record on appeal, see State v. Ballard, 855 S.W.2d 557, 560 (Tenn. 1993), which includes the duty to “have prepared a transcript of such part of the evidence or proceedings as is necessary to convey a fair, accurate and complete account of what transpired with respect to those issues that are the bases of appeal.” Tenn. R. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Henninggreen2 sentences2003State v. Henning, 975 S.W.2d 290, 299 (Tenn. 1998). 2002State v. Henning, 975 S.W.2d 290, 299 (Tenn. 1998). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Odomgreen2 sentences2016ANALYSIS When this court reviews a trial court‟s ruling on a motion to suppress evidence, “[q]uestions of credibility of the witnesses, the weight and value of the evidence, and resolution of conflicts in the evidence are matters entrusted to the trial judge as the trier of fact.” State v. Odom, 928 S.W.2d 18, 23 (Tenn. 1996). 2003Accordingly, the standard of review set forth in Odom, 928 S.W.2d at 23 , regarding the trial court’s findings of fact will not apply, and our review of the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress in this instance will be de novo. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Taylorgreen1 sentence2025As the party raising the issue, it is Defendant’s responsibility “to prepare a record which conveys a fair, accurate and complete account of what transpired with respect to the issues which form the basis of the appeal.” State v. Taylor, 992 S.W.2d 941, 944 (Tenn. 1999); see also Tenn. R. | 1 | 1 |
Carpenter v. Stategreen1 sentence2017That is, a petitioner alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel must prove both that appellate counsel was deficient in failing to adequately pursue or preserve a particular issue on appeal and that, absent counsel‟s deficient performance, there was a reasonable probability that the issue “would have affected the result of the appeal.” Id. at 597; see also Carpenter v. State, 126 S.W.3d 879, 886-88 (Tenn. 2004). - 24 - A. Failure to Include a Copy of the Suppression Hearing Transcript in the Record on Appeal Petitioner argues that appellate counsel rendered deficient performance by | 1 | 1 |
State v. Banesgreen1 sentence2001See State v. Banes, 874 S.W.2d 73, 82 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Griffithgreen1 sentence1988T.R.A.P. 24(b); Tenn.R.Crim.P. 12(g); see State v. Griffith, 649 S.W.2d 9 (Tenn.Crim.App.1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Utley
green
1 sentence1994Utley, 928 S.W.2d at 453 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Griffin v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1975Britt v. North Carolina, 404 U.S. *476 226, 227, 92 S.Ct. 431 , 30 L.Ed.2d 400 (1971); Roberts v. LaVallee, 389 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 194 , 19 L.Ed.2d 41 (1967); Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 (1955). 1975Britt v. North Carolina, 404 U.S. *476 226, 227, 92 S.Ct. 431 , 30 L.Ed.2d 400 (1971); Roberts v. LaVallee, 389 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 194 , 19 L.Ed.2d 41 (1967); Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 (1955). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Roberts v. LaVallee
green
2 sentences1975Britt v. North Carolina, 404 U.S. *476 226, 227, 92 S.Ct. 431 , 30 L.Ed.2d 400 (1971); Roberts v. LaVallee, 389 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 194 , 19 L.Ed.2d 41 (1967); Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 (1955). 1975Britt v. North Carolina, 404 U.S. *476 226, 227, 92 S.Ct. 431 , 30 L.Ed.2d 400 (1971); Roberts v. LaVallee, 389 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 194 , 19 L.Ed.2d 41 (1967); Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 (1955). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Bruton v. United States
green
2 sentences1975The defendant Elliott also contends the trial court committed prejudicial error in refusing to declare a mistrial when a state’s witness, in relating the substance of Mitch-um’s oral confession, implicated Elliott, citing Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968). 1975The defendant Elliott also contends the trial court committed prejudicial error in refusing to declare a mistrial when a state’s witness, in relating the substance of Mitch-um’s oral confession, implicated Elliott, citing Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Britt v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences1975Britt v. North Carolina, 404 U.S. *476 226, 227, 92 S.Ct. 431 , 30 L.Ed.2d 400 (1971); Roberts v. LaVallee, 389 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 194 , 19 L.Ed.2d 41 (1967); Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 (1955). 1975Britt v. North Carolina, 404 U.S. *476 226, 227, 92 S.Ct. 431 , 30 L.Ed.2d 400 (1971); Roberts v. LaVallee, 389 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 194 , 19 L.Ed.2d 41 (1967); Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 (1955). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.