absent manifest error (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

absent manifest error in Louisiana

61 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

CaseFollowedCited
Arceneaux v. Dominguegreen
la · 1978 · cited in 32 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1988–2023
2 sentences

2008Ambulance Service, 93-3099, pp. 8-9 *219 (La.7/5/94), 639 So.2d 216, 220-221 , for guidance: In Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), this Court held that the court of appeal should not upset the factual findings of a trial court absent manifest error or unless clearly wrong.

1996In Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), we held that an appellate court should not upset factual findings of a trial court absent manifest error or unless clearly wrong.

332
Brown v. Rougongreen
la · 1990 · cited in 3 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1992–1996
2 sentences

1996Ellis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., [ 550 So.2d 1310 (La.App. 1st Cir.1989), writ denied 559 So.2d 121 (La.1990)]....

1992See Ellis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 550 So.2d 1310 (La.App. 1st Cir.1989), writ denied, 559 So.2d 121 (La.1990).

23
Ellis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.green
lactapp · 1989 · cited in 3 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1992–1996
2 sentences

1996Ellis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., [ 550 So.2d 1310 (La.App. 1st Cir.1989), writ denied 559 So.2d 121 (La.1990)]....

1992See Ellis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 550 So.2d 1310 (La.App. 1st Cir.1989), writ denied, 559 So.2d 121 (La.1990).

23
Rosell v. Escogreen
la · 1989 · cited in 9 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1990–2004
2 sentences

2004Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989).

1993The trial court's determinations on these issues must be given the greatest weight, and must not be disturbed by this Court absent manifest error, even if this Court, if "sitting as the trier of fact, would have weighed the evidence differently." Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d at 844 .

19
Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv.green
la · 1994 · cited in 7 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1994–2008
2 sentences

2008Ambulance Service, 93-3099, pp. 8-9 *219 (La.7/5/94), 639 So.2d 216, 220-221 , for guidance: In Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), this Court held that the court of appeal should not upset the factual findings of a trial court absent manifest error or unless clearly wrong.

1995Ambulance Service, 639 So.2d 216, 220 (La. 1994), the supreme court discussed the following standard for review of factual findings: In Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), this Court held that the court of appeal should not upset the factual findings of a trial court absent manifest error or unless clearly wrong.

17
Siverd v. Permanent General Ins. Co.green
la · 2006 · cited in 4 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2012
2 sentences

2012This argument has merit. | ^Discussion In Siverd v. Permanent General Insurance Company, 2005-0973 (La.2/22/06), 922 So.2d 497 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the following concerning the review of fact: A court of appeal should not set aside the factual findings of a trial court absent manifest error or unless clearly wrong.

2010DISCUSSION The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Siverd v. Permanent General Insurance Co., 05-973, p. 3 (La.2/22/06), 922 So.2d 497, 499-500 (citations omitted), set out the standard of review applicable to this matter: A court of appeal should not set aside the factual findings of a trial court absent manifest error or unless clearly wrong.

14
Rosselli v. Rosselligreen
lactapp · 1977 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008Morris v, Morris, 04-676, p. 12 (La.App. 5th Cir.11/30/04), 889 So.2d 1048, 1055 , writ denied, 04-3185 (La.3/11/05), 896 So.2d 68 ; Larsen v. Polk, 02-1104, p. 9 (La.App. 5th Cir.2/25/03), 841 So.2d 992, 997 , writ denied, 03-0877 (La.4/25/03), 842 So.2d 412 ; Rosselli v. Rosselli, 352 So.2d 370, 370-371 (La.App. 4th Cir.1977).

11
OFFICE OF ENVIR. AFFAIRS v. McWHORTER & ASSOC.green
lactapp · 1984 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (24)

CaseCitedYears
Coston v. Seo green
lactapp · 2012
2 sentences

2014Coston v. Seo, 2012-0216, p. 8 (La.App. 4 Cir. 8/15/12), 99 So.3d 83, 88 .

2013Coston , p. 8, 99 So.3d at 88 .

22013–2014
Sherrod v. Sherrod green
lactapp · 1998
1 sentence

2018Id. (citing Sherrod , 709 So.2d at 352 ).

12018–2018
Kambur v. Kambur green
lactapp · 1995
1 sentence

2018Id. (citing Sherrod , 709 So.2d at 352 ).

12018–2018
Dugas v. Works green
lactapp · 2011
1 sentence

2016Dugas, 61 So.3d 826 .

12016–2016
Marshall Ex Rel. Minor Chil. v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. green
lactapp · 2008
2 sentences

2014“In reviewing factual findings, the reviewing court should not set aside the factual findings of the trial court absent manifest error or unless those findings are clearly wrong.” Marshall ex rel. minor children v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc., 08-0668, p. 5 (La.App. 4 Cir. 12/17/08), 2 So.3d 541, 546 .

2014“The issue to be resolved by a reviewing court is not whether the trier of fact was right or tvrong, but whether the factfinder’s conclusion was reasonable.” Id.

12014–2014
Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections green
la · 1994
1 sentence

2014Smith, 633 So.2d at 132 .

12014–2014
Troth Corp. v. DEUTSCH, KERRIGAN & STILES green
lactapp · 2007
1 sentence

2014Discover Bank v. Rusher, 10-0850, p. 3 (La.App. 4 Cir. 12/8/10), | 1853 So.3d 651 , 653; Troth Corp. v. Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, 06-0457, p. 3 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/24/07), 951 So.2d 1162, 1165 .

12014–2014
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Schwegmann Westside Expressway, Inc. green
la · 1996
1 sentence

2012Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978); State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Schwegmann Westside Expressway, Inc., 95-1261 (La.3/1/96), 669 So.2d 1172 .

12012–2012
State ex rel. J.M. green
lactapp · 1999
1 sentence

2012State in the Interest of J.M., 742 So.2d 6 .

12012–2012
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT v. Unverzagt green
lactapp · 1991
1 sentence

2011Smith v. State, Dept, of Transp. & Development, supra. Additionally, the appellate court will not upset a finding of the trial court absent manifest error.

12011–2011
Larsen v. Polk green
lactapp · 2003
1 sentence

2008Morris v, Morris, 04-676, p. 12 (La.App. 5th Cir.11/30/04), 889 So.2d 1048, 1055 , writ denied, 04-3185 (La.3/11/05), 896 So.2d 68 ; Larsen v. Polk, 02-1104, p. 9 (La.App. 5th Cir.2/25/03), 841 So.2d 992, 997 , writ denied, 03-0877 (La.4/25/03), 842 So.2d 412 ; Rosselli v. Rosselli, 352 So.2d 370, 370-371 (La.App. 4th Cir.1977).

12008–2008
Morris v. Morris green
lactapp · 2004
1 sentence

2008Morris v, Morris, 04-676, p. 12 (La.App. 5th Cir.11/30/04), 889 So.2d 1048, 1055 , writ denied, 04-3185 (La.3/11/05), 896 So.2d 68 ; Larsen v. Polk, 02-1104, p. 9 (La.App. 5th Cir.2/25/03), 841 So.2d 992, 997 , writ denied, 03-0877 (La.4/25/03), 842 So.2d 412 ; Rosselli v. Rosselli, 352 So.2d 370, 370-371 (La.App. 4th Cir.1977).

12008–2008
Larsen v. Polk green
la · 2003
1 sentence

2008Morris v, Morris, 04-676, p. 12 (La.App. 5th Cir.11/30/04), 889 So.2d 1048, 1055 , writ denied, 04-3185 (La.3/11/05), 896 So.2d 68 ; Larsen v. Polk, 02-1104, p. 9 (La.App. 5th Cir.2/25/03), 841 So.2d 992, 997 , writ denied, 03-0877 (La.4/25/03), 842 So.2d 412 ; Rosselli v. Rosselli, 352 So.2d 370, 370-371 (La.App. 4th Cir.1977).

12008–2008
Johnson v. KTBS, INC. green
la · 2005
1 sentence

2008Morris v, Morris, 04-676, p. 12 (La.App. 5th Cir.11/30/04), 889 So.2d 1048, 1055 , writ denied, 04-3185 (La.3/11/05), 896 So.2d 68 ; Larsen v. Polk, 02-1104, p. 9 (La.App. 5th Cir.2/25/03), 841 So.2d 992, 997 , writ denied, 03-0877 (La.4/25/03), 842 So.2d 412 ; Rosselli v. Rosselli, 352 So.2d 370, 370-371 (La.App. 4th Cir.1977).

12008–2008
Siverd v. PERMANENT GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY neutral
la · 2006
1 sentence

2008Co., 05-0973 (La.2/22/06), 922 So.2d 497, 499 , writ denied as moot, 05-0967 (La.4/24/06), 926 So.2d 532 (citation omitted).

12008–2008
Stobart v. State Through DOTD green
la · 1993
1 sentence

2007Stobart v. State of Louisiana, through Dep’t of Transp. & Dev., 617 So.2d 880 (La.1993).

12007–2007
Harris v. West Carroll Parish School Bd. green
lactapp · 1992
1 sentence

2000Rosell, supra; Harris, supra. Referring back to the policy as quoted earlier in this opinion, we first find that the School Board complied with Step 1.

12000–2000
Stroik v. Ponseti green
la · 1997
1 sentence

1999Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), 699 So.2d 1072, 1079 .

11999–1999
Todd v. State neutral
lactapp · 1997
1 sentence

1997Id.

11997–1997
Livingston Parish Police Jury v. Acadiana Shipyards green
lactapp · 1992
1 sentence

1997Livingston Parish Police Jury v. Acadiana Shipyards, Inc., 598 So.2d at 1181 .

11997–1997
State v. Rollins neutral
la · 1996
1 sentence

1997Rosell v. ESCO, supra; Caracci v. Vail, 96-147 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96) , 676 So.2d 1106 ; writ denied 96-1892 (La.10/25/96), 681 So.2d 377 .

11997–1997
Caracci v. Vail neutral
lactapp · 1996
2 sentences

1997Rosell v. ESCO, supra; Caracci v. Vail, 96-147 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96) , 676 So.2d 1106 ; writ denied 96-1892 (La.10/25/96), 681 So.2d 377 .

1997Rosell v. ESCO, supra; Caracci v. Vail, 96-147 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96) , 676 So.2d 1106 ; writ denied 96-1892 (La.10/25/96), 681 So.2d 377 .

11997–1997
Red River Waterway Com'n v. Fry green
lactapp · 1993
2 sentences

1995Id.

1995Id.

11995–1995
Canter v. Koehring Company green
la · 1973
11984–1984

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 3 (4) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 48:453 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check