Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1972–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.green2 sentences2012AT&T Technologies, [Inc v Communications Workers of America, 475 US 643, 649; 106 S Ct 1415 ; 89 L Ed 2d 648 (1986)]; see [United States Steelworkers v] Warrior & Gulf [Navigation Co, 363 US 574 , 583 n 7; 80 S Ct 1347 ; 4 L Ed 2d 1409 (1960)]. 2012AT&T Technologies, [Inc v Communications Workers of America, 475 US 643, 649; 106 S Ct 1415 ; 89 L Ed 2d 648 (1986)]; see [United States Steelworkers v] Warrior & Gulf [Navigation Co, 363 US 574 , 583 n 7; 80 S Ct 1347 ; 4 L Ed 2d 1409 (1960)]. | 1 | 1 |
At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workersgreen2 sentences2012AT&T Technologies, [Inc v Communications Workers of America, 475 US 643, 649; 106 S Ct 1415 ; 89 L Ed 2d 648 (1986)]; see [United States Steelworkers v] Warrior & Gulf [Navigation Co, 363 US 574 , 583 n 7; 80 S Ct 1347 ; 4 L Ed 2d 1409 (1960)]. 2012AT&T Technologies, [Inc v Communications Workers of America, 475 US 643, 649; 106 S Ct 1415 ; 89 L Ed 2d 648 (1986)]; see [United States Steelworkers v] Warrior & Gulf [Navigation Co, 363 US 574 , 583 n 7; 80 S Ct 1347 ; 4 L Ed 2d 1409 (1960)]. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. Gavin
green
2 sentences2016A reviewing court must “be reluctant to modify or vacate an award because of the difficulty or impossibility, without speculation, of determining what caused an arbitrator to rule as he did.” Id. 2016“The character or seriousness of an error of law which will invite judicial action to vacate an arbitration award . . . must be error so material or so substantial as to have governed the award, and but for which the award would have been substantially otherwise.” Id. at 443 . | 3 | 2005–2016 |
Fette v. Peters Construction Co
green
2 sentences2022Moreover, as already noted, generally, “arbitrators, and not the courts, should resolve procedural matters.” Fette, 310 Mich App at 546 . 2022Moreover, as already noted, generally, “arbitrators, and not the courts, should resolve procedural matters.” Fette, 310 Mich App at 546 . | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Howell v. Vito's Trucking and Excavating Co.
green
2 sentences1972Neither plaintiff nor defendants in the present action was bound by the common pleas judgment in the Singleton case, Howell v Vito’s Trucking Co, 386 Mich 37 (1971). 1972Neither plaintiff nor defendants in the present action was bound by the common pleas judgment in the Singleton case, Howell v Vito's Trucking Co, 386 Mich 37 (1971). | 2 | 1972–1972 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.