Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sykes v. City of Battle Creekgreen2 sentences1993Indeed, in earlier cases this Court has interpreted language similar to that found in this charter as imposing only a public duty punishable "in some form of public prosecution, and not by way of individual recovery of damages.” Taylor v Lake Shore & MSR Co, 45 Mich 74, 77 ; 7 NW 728 (1881) (opinion of Cooley, J., emphasis added); see also Lynch v Hubbard, 101 Mich 43 ; 59 NW 443 (1894). 9 Michigan is strongly committed to the concept of home rule, 10 and constitutional and statutory provisions which grant power to municipalities are to be liberally construed. 11 However, a city may not validl 1993Indeed, in earlier cases this Court has interpreted language similar to that found in this charter as imposing only a public duty punishable "in some form of public prosecution, and not by way of individual recovery of damages.” Taylor v Lake Shore & MSR Co, 45 Mich 74, 77 ; 7 NW 728 (1881) (opinion of Cooley, J., emphasis added); see also Lynch v Hubbard, 101 Mich 43 ; 59 NW 443 (1894). 9 Michigan is strongly committed to the concept of home rule, 10 and constitutional and statutory provisions which grant power to municipalities are to be liberally construed. 11 However, a city may not validl | 1 | 1 |
Lynch v. Hubbardgreen2 sentences1993Indeed, in earlier cases this Court has interpreted language similar to that found in this charter as imposing only a public duty punishable "in some form of public prosecution, and not by way of individual recovery of damages.” Taylor v Lake Shore & MSR Co, 45 Mich 74, 77 ; 7 NW 728 (1881) (opinion of Cooley, J., emphasis added); see also Lynch v Hubbard, 101 Mich 43 ; 59 NW 443 (1894). 9 Michigan is strongly committed to the concept of home rule, 10 and constitutional and statutory provisions which grant power to municipalities are to be liberally construed. 11 However, a city may not validl 1993Indeed, in earlier cases this Court has interpreted language similar to that found in this charter as imposing only a public duty punishable "in some form of public prosecution, and not by way of individual recovery of damages.” Taylor v Lake Shore & MSR Co, 45 Mich 74, 77 ; 7 NW 728 (1881) (opinion of Cooley, J., emphasis added); see also Lynch v Hubbard, 101 Mich 43 ; 59 NW 443 (1894). 9 Michigan is strongly committed to the concept of home rule, 10 and constitutional and statutory provisions which grant power to municipalities are to be liberally construed. 11 However, a city may not validl | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bivens v. Grand Rapids
green
2 sentences2019“Michigan is strongly committed to the concept of home rule, and constitutional and statutory provisions which grant power to municipalities are to be liberally construed.” Bivens v Grand Rapids, 443 Mich 391, 400 ; 505 NW2d 239 (1993). 2019“Michigan is strongly committed to the concept of home rule, and constitutional and statutory provisions which grant power to municipalities are to be liberally construed.” Bivens v Grand Rapids, 443 Mich 391, 400 ; 505 NW2d 239 (1993). | 7 | 2018–2019 |
City of Taylor v. Detroit Edison Co.
green
2 sentences2018Local governments, however, may "exercise 'reasonable control' to regulate matters of local concern only in a manner and to the degree that the regulation does not conflict with state law." City of Taylor v. Detroit Edison Co. , 475 Mich. 109 , 117-118, 715 N.W.2d 28 (2006). 2018Local governments, however, may "exercise 'reasonable control' to regulate matters of local concern only in a manner and to the degree that the regulation does not conflict with state law." City of Taylor v. Detroit Edison Co. , 475 Mich. 109 , 117-118, 715 N.W.2d 28 (2006). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Taylor v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad
green
2 sentences1993Indeed, in earlier cases this Court has interpreted language similar to that found in this charter as imposing only a public duty punishable "in some form of public prosecution, and not by way of individual recovery of damages.” Taylor v Lake Shore & MSR Co, 45 Mich 74, 77 ; 7 NW 728 (1881) (opinion of Cooley, J., emphasis added); see also Lynch v Hubbard, 101 Mich 43 ; 59 NW 443 (1894). 9 Michigan is strongly committed to the concept of home rule, 10 and constitutional and statutory provisions which grant power to municipalities are to be liberally construed. 11 However, a city may not validl 1993Indeed, in earlier cases this Court has interpreted language similar to that found in this charter as imposing only a public duty punishable "in some form of public prosecution, and not by way of individual recovery of damages.” Taylor v Lake Shore & MSR Co, 45 Mich 74, 77 ; 7 NW 728 (1881) (opinion of Cooley, J., emphasis added); see also Lynch v Hubbard, 101 Mich 43 ; 59 NW 443 (1894). 9 Michigan is strongly committed to the concept of home rule, 10 and constitutional and statutory provisions which grant power to municipalities are to be liberally construed. 11 However, a city may not validl | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Common Council of Jackson v. Harrington
neutral
2 sentences1993Indeed, in earlier cases this Court has interpreted language similar to that found in this charter as imposing only a public duty punishable "in some form of public prosecution, and not by way of individual recovery of damages.” Taylor v Lake Shore & MSR Co, 45 Mich 74, 77 ; 7 NW 728 (1881) (opinion of Cooley, J., emphasis added); see also Lynch v Hubbard, 101 Mich 43 ; 59 NW 443 (1894). 9 Michigan is strongly committed to the concept of home rule, 10 and constitutional and statutory provisions which grant power to municipalities are to be liberally construed. 11 However, a city may not validl 1993Indeed, in earlier cases this Court has interpreted language similar to that found in this charter as imposing only a public duty punishable "in some form of public prosecution, and not by way of individual recovery of damages.” Taylor v Lake Shore & MSR Co, 45 Mich 74, 77 ; 7 NW 728 (1881) (opinion of Cooley, J., emphasis added); see also Lynch v Hubbard, 101 Mich 43 ; 59 NW 443 (1894). 9 Michigan is strongly committed to the concept of home rule, 10 and constitutional and statutory provisions which grant power to municipalities are to be liberally construed. 11 However, a city may not validl | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.