instances of prosecutorial error (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

instances of prosecutorial error in Michigan

8 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Ericksengreen
michctapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025See id.

11
People v. Coxgreen
michctapp · 2006 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019See People v Cox, 268 Mich App 440, 451 ; 709 NW2d 152 (2005).

2019See People v Cox, 268 Mich App 440, 451 ; 709 NW2d 152 (2005).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Brown green
michctapp · 2011
2 sentences

2018“Unpreserved claims of prosecutorial misconduct are reviewed for plain error affecting substantial rights.” People v Brown, 294 Mich App 377, 382 ; 811 NW2d 531 (2011).

2018“Unpreserved claims of prosecutorial misconduct are reviewed for plain error affecting substantial rights.” People v Brown, 294 Mich App 377, 382 ; 811 NW2d 531 (2011).

22018–2018
People v. Wilkens green
michctapp · 2005
1 sentence

2025Further, “[c]ircumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences drawn from it may be sufficient to prove the elements of the crime.” Id. 1 Martinez claims that his trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to object to the alleged instances of prosecutorial error.

12025–2025
People v. Douglas green
mich · 2014
2 sentences

2021PROSECUTORIAL ERROR Defendant merely states in his brief on appeal that defense counsel failed to object to the numerous instances of prosecutorial error as listed in section IV, and cites only People v Douglas, 496 Mich 557 ; 852 NW2d 587 (2014).

2021PROSECUTORIAL ERROR Defendant merely states in his brief on appeal that defense counsel failed to object to the numerous instances of prosecutorial error as listed in section IV, and cites only People v Douglas, 496 Mich 557 ; 852 NW2d 587 (2014).

12021–2021
People v. Pfaffle green
michctapp · 2001
2 sentences

2016People v Pfaffle, 246 Mich App 282, 288 ; 632 NW2d 162 (2001).

2016People v Pfaffle, 246 Mich App 282, 288 ; 632 NW2d 162 (2001).

12016–2016
People v. Callon green
michctapp · 2003
1 sentence

2015Id.

12015–2015

Where else courts name it

MI 8 (2015–2025) AZ 3 (2020–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check