Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Watsongreen2 sentences2026People v Watson, 245 Mich App 572, 586 ; 629 NW2d 411 (2001). 2026People v Watson, 245 Mich App 572, 586 ; 629 NW2d 411 (2001). | 1 | 2 |
People v. Stanawaygreen1 sentence1998An exception exists if a curative instruction could not have eliminated the prejudicial effect or where failure to consider the issue would result in a miscarriage of justice. [Stanaway, supra at 687 (citations omitted).] A miscarriage will not be found if the prejudicial effect of the prosecutor’s comments could have been cured by a timely curative instruction. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Bennett
green
2 sentences2021Bennett, 290 Mich App at 476 ; People v Ullah, 216 Mich App 669, 682 ; 550 NW2d 568 (1996). 2015Bennett, 290 Mich App at 476 . | 3 | 2015–2021 |
People v. Schutte
green
1 sentence2023Schutte, 240 Mich App at 721 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Ullah
green
2 sentences2021Bennett, 290 Mich App at 476 ; People v Ullah, 216 Mich App 669, 682 ; 550 NW2d 568 (1996). 2021Bennett, 290 Mich App at 476 ; People v Ullah, 216 Mich App 669, 682 ; 550 NW2d 568 (1996). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
People v. Rivera
green
2 sentences1998People v Rivera, 216 Mich App 648, 651-652 ; 550 NW2d 593 (1996). 1998People v Rivera, 216 Mich App 648, 651-652 ; 550 NW2d 593 (1996). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
People v. Jansson
green
2 sentences1983Absence of objection during trial precludes appellate review of allegedly prejudicial remarks during closing argument, Cogo v Moore, 119 Mich App 747, 754 ; 327 NW2d 345 (1982); Warren, supra, p 501 , unless the prejudicial effect was so great that it could not have been cured by a timely curative instruction and failure to consider the issue would result in a miscarriage of justice, People v Jansson, 116 Mich App 674, 692 ; 323 NW2d 508 (1982). 1983Absence of objection during trial precludes appellate review of allegedly prejudicial remarks during closing argument, Cogo v Moore, 119 Mich App 747, 754 ; 327 NW2d 345 (1982); Warren, supra, p 501 , unless the prejudicial effect was so great that it could not have been cured by a timely curative instruction and failure to consider the issue would result in a miscarriage of justice, People v Jansson, 116 Mich App 674, 692 ; 323 NW2d 508 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Warren v. McLouth Steel Corp.
green
2 sentences1983Absence of objection during trial precludes appellate review of allegedly prejudicial remarks during closing argument, Cogo v Moore, 119 Mich App 747, 754 ; 327 NW2d 345 (1982); Warren, supra, p 501 , unless the prejudicial effect was so great that it could not have been cured by a timely curative instruction and failure to consider the issue would result in a miscarriage of justice, People v Jansson, 116 Mich App 674, 692 ; 323 NW2d 508 (1982). 1983Absence of objection during trial precludes appellate review of allegedly prejudicial remarks during closing argument, Cogo v Moore, 119 Mich App 747, 754 ; 327 NW2d 345 (1982); Warren, supra, p 501 , unless the prejudicial effect was so great that it could not have been cured by a timely curative instruction and failure to consider the issue would result in a miscarriage of justice, People v Jansson, 116 Mich App 674, 692 ; 323 NW2d 508 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Cogo v. Moore
green
2 sentences1983Absence of objection during trial precludes appellate review of allegedly prejudicial remarks during closing argument, Cogo v Moore, 119 Mich App 747, 754 ; 327 NW2d 345 (1982); Warren, supra, p 501 , unless the prejudicial effect was so great that it could not have been cured by a timely curative instruction and failure to consider the issue would result in a miscarriage of justice, People v Jansson, 116 Mich App 674, 692 ; 323 NW2d 508 (1982). 1983Absence of objection during trial precludes appellate review of allegedly prejudicial remarks during closing argument, Cogo v Moore, 119 Mich App 747, 754 ; 327 NW2d 345 (1982); Warren, supra, p 501 , unless the prejudicial effect was so great that it could not have been cured by a timely curative instruction and failure to consider the issue would result in a miscarriage of justice, People v Jansson, 116 Mich App 674, 692 ; 323 NW2d 508 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.