Avas error (Minnesota) · Go Syfert
← Minnesota issues

Avas error in Minnesota

8 Minnesota opinions name it 1 courts 1929–1940 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. green
minn · 1937
2 sentences

1940Under the Licha case, 201 Minn. 427 , 276 N. W. 813 ; Massmann v. G.

1940Under the Licha case, 201 Minn. 427 , 276 N. W. 813 ; Massmann v. G.

11940–1940
Bukowski v. Travelers Insurance Co. neutral
minn · 1935
2 sentences

1940Co. 196 Minn. 31 , 264 N. W. 217 ; Santee v. Travelers Ins.

1940Co. 196 Minn. 31 , 264 N. W. 217 ; Santee v. Travelers Ins.

11940–1940
Chase v. Tingdale Bros. green
minn · 1914
2 sentences

1938Here as in Chase v. Tingdale Bros. 127 Minn. 401, 403 , 149 N. W. 654, 655 , “as the jury never reached the question of damages, it is plain that there is nothing to decide here.” See also Lorberbaum v. Christopher, 198 Minn. 289, 294 , 269 N. W. 646 .

1938Here as in Chase v. Tingdale Bros. 127 Minn. 401, 403 , 149 N. W. 654, 655 , “as the jury never reached the question of damages, it is plain that there is nothing to decide here.” See also Lorberbaum v. Christopher, 198 Minn. 289, 294 , 269 N. W. 646 .

11938–1938
Lorberbaum v. Christopher green
minn · 1936
2 sentences

1938Here as in Chase v. Tingdale Bros. 127 Minn. 401, 403 , 149 N. W. 654, 655 , “as the jury never reached the question of damages, it is plain that there is nothing to decide here.” See also Lorberbaum v. Christopher, 198 Minn. 289, 294 , 269 N. W. 646 .

1938Here as in Chase v. Tingdale Bros. 127 Minn. 401, 403 , 149 N. W. 654, 655 , “as the jury never reached the question of damages, it is plain that there is nothing to decide here.” See also Lorberbaum v. Christopher, 198 Minn. 289, 294 , 269 N. W. 646 .

11938–1938
Clark County v. Harris neutral
ark · 1916
2 sentences

1934Plaintiff cites the following cases, claiming that they show that it Avas error to direct the verdict: Clark County v. Harris, 124 Ark. 59 , 186 S. W. 290 ; Streipe v. Liberty Hut.

1934Plaintiff cites the following cases, claiming that they show that it Avas error to direct the verdict: Clark County v. Harris, 124 Ark. 59 , 186 S. W. 290 ; Streipe v. Liberty Hut.

11934–1934
Vernon Center State Bank v. Mangelsen green
minn · 1926
2 sentences

1933That question should have been decided for plaintiff as matter of law under the rule of Vernon Center State Bank v. Mangelsen, 166 Minn. 472 , 208 N. W. 186 , annotated 18 A. L.

1933That question should have been decided for plaintiff as matter of law under the rule of Vernon Center State Bank v. Mangelsen, 166 Minn. 472 , 208 N. W. 186 , annotated 18 A. L.

11933–1933
Phelps v. City of Mankato neutral
minn · 1877
1 sentence

1931Counsel rely on the holdings in Phelps v. City of Mankato, 23 Minn. 276, 279 ; Kelly v. Southern Minn. Ry.

11931–1931
State v. Corey green
minn · 1930
2 sentences

1931State v. Corey, 182 Minn. 48, 51 , 233 N. W. 590 .

1931State v. Corey, 182 Minn. 48, 51 , 233 N. W. 590 .

11931–1931
Geraghty v. Kilroy green
minn · 1908
2 sentences

1929Irrespective of foundation or Avithout it, “the attesting witnesses to a Avill are competent to testify and give an opinion as to the testamentary capacity of the testator.” Geraghty v. Kilroy, 103 Minn. 286 , 114 N. W. 838 .

1929Irrespective of foundation or Avithout it, “the attesting witnesses to a Avill are competent to testify and give an opinion as to the testamentary capacity of the testator.” Geraghty v. Kilroy, 103 Minn. 286 , 114 N. W. 838 .

11929–1929

Where else courts name it

AL 9 (1904–1915) MN 8 (1929–1940) NE 5 (1904–1921) MO 3 (1906–1910) PA 3 (1905–1960) WI 2 (1870–1896) NY 2 (1901–1963) TX 2 (1909–1931) HI 2 (1922–1928)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check