Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1952–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Estate of Van Cleavegreen2 sentences1996See In re Estate of Van Cleave, 610 S.W.2d 620, 622 (Mo.1981). 1981In the Matter of the Estate of Van Cleave, 610 S.W.2d 620, 622 (Mo. banc 1981); Menees v.Cowgill, 359 Mo. 697, 706 , 223 S.W.2d 412, 416 (1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 949 , 70 S.Ct. 488 , 94 L.Ed. 585 (1950); Mize v. Sims, 516 S.W.2d 561, 564 (Mo.App.1974). | 2 | 2 |
Goldberg v. Robertsongreen2 sentences1996Goldberg v. Robertson, 615 S.W.2d 59, 61 (Mo.banc 1981). 1996Goldberg v. Robertson, 615 S.W.2d 59, 62 (Mo.1981). (citations omitted) In Missouri an equitably adopted child may bring an action under the wrongful death statute. | 2 | 2 |
Hogane v. Ottersbachgreen1 sentence1981Equitable adoptions are to be declared “only where justice, equity and good faith require it.” Hogane v. Otterbach, 269 S.W.2d 9, 11 (Mo.1954); Rich v. Baer, 361 Mo. 1048, 1056 , 238 S.W.2d 408, 411 (1951). | 1 | 1 |
Menees v. Cowgillgreen2 sentences1981In the Matter of the Estate of Van Cleave, 610 S.W.2d 620, 622 (Mo. banc 1981); Menees v.Cowgill, 359 Mo. 697, 706 , 223 S.W.2d 412, 416 (1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 949 , 70 S.Ct. 488 , 94 L.Ed. 585 (1950); Mize v. Sims, 516 S.W.2d 561, 564 (Mo.App.1974). 1981In the Matter of the Estate of Van Cleave, 610 S.W.2d 620, 622 (Mo. banc 1981); Menees v.Cowgill, 359 Mo. 697, 706 , 223 S.W.2d 412, 416 (1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 949 , 70 S.Ct. 488 , 94 L.Ed. 585 (1950); Mize v. Sims, 516 S.W.2d 561, 564 (Mo.App.1974). | 1 | 1 |
Rich v. Baergreen2 sentences1981Equitable adoptions are to be declared “only where justice, equity and good faith require it.” Hogane v. Otterbach, 269 S.W.2d 9, 11 (Mo.1954); Rich v. Baer, 361 Mo. 1048, 1056 , 238 S.W.2d 408, 411 (1951). 1981Equitable adoptions are to be declared “only where justice, equity and good faith require it.” Hogane v. Otterbach, 269 S.W.2d 9, 11 (Mo.1954); Rich v. Baer, 361 Mo. 1048, 1056 , 238 S.W.2d 408, 411 (1951). | 1 | 1 |
Mize v. Simsgreen1 sentence1981In the Matter of the Estate of Van Cleave, 610 S.W.2d 620, 622 (Mo. banc 1981); Menees v.Cowgill, 359 Mo. 697, 706 , 223 S.W.2d 412, 416 (1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 949 , 70 S.Ct. 488 , 94 L.Ed. 585 (1950); Mize v. Sims, 516 S.W.2d 561, 564 (Mo.App.1974). | 1 | 1 |
Lukas v. Haysgreen1 sentence1978Lukas v. Hays, 283 S.W.2d 561, 566 (Mo.1955). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. Moseley
green
2 sentences1981In Thompson v. Moseley, 344 Mo. 240 , 125 S.W.2d 860 (1939), this Court stated that the basis of the equitable adoption doctrine: has been recognized to be that it is so inequitable and unjust to allow one to fail to comply with an agreement made with the parent or custodian of a child to adopt it, when he has taken the child at such an age that it had no will or choice of its own in the matter, that, after the child has performed everything contemplated by the relation provided for, the intended adoptive parent or his heirs will be estopped to deny an adoption. 344 Mo. at 245 , 125 S.W.2d at 1981In Thompson v. Moseley, 344 Mo. 240 , 125 S.W.2d 860 (1939), this Court stated that the basis of the equitable adoption doctrine: has been recognized to be that it is so inequitable and unjust to allow one to fail to comply with an agreement made with the parent or custodian of a child to adopt it, when he has taken the child at such an age that it had no will or choice of its own in the matter, that, after the child has performed everything contemplated by the relation provided for, the intended adoptive parent or his heirs will be estopped to deny an adoption. 344 Mo. at 245 , 125 S.W.2d at | 2 | 1952–1981 |
Drake v. Drake
green
1 sentence2019The Court found that doctrine of equitable adoption was "developed solely to benefit the child." Id. (citing Drake v. Drake, 43 S.W.2d 556 (Mo. banc 1931). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Taylor v. General Motors Corp.
neutral
1 sentence2019Id. at 926 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Halterman v. Halterman
green
2 sentences2019Id. at 560 . 2019The Court found that doctrine of equitable adoption was "developed solely to benefit the child." Id. (citing Drake v. Drake, 43 S.W.2d 556 (Mo. banc 1931). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Rumans Ex Rel. Jackson v. Lighthizer
green
1 sentence2019This original intent was supported by Rumans v. Lighthizer, 249 S.W.2d 397 (Mo. 1952) in which the Missouri Supreme Court held that equitable adoption could not be used to establish heirship for the purposes of an alleged "adopted" parent inheriting from a child who was alleged to have been equitably adopted. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Holt v. Burlington Northern Railroad
green
2 sentences1986Cf. Holt v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, 685 S.W.2d 851 (Mo.App.1984). 1986Holt v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, 685 S.W.2d 851 (Mo.App.1985) is not fully in point. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Lincoln Electric Co. v. Commissioner
green
1 sentence1981In the Matter of the Estate of Van Cleave, 610 S.W.2d 620, 622 (Mo. banc 1981); Menees v.Cowgill, 359 Mo. 697, 706 , 223 S.W.2d 412, 416 (1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 949 , 70 S.Ct. 488 , 94 L.Ed. 585 (1950); Mize v. Sims, 516 S.W.2d 561, 564 (Mo.App.1974). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Commissioner v. Rickenberg
green
2 sentences1981In the Matter of the Estate of Van Cleave, 610 S.W.2d 620, 622 (Mo. banc 1981); Menees v.Cowgill, 359 Mo. 697, 706 , 223 S.W.2d 412, 416 (1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 949 , 70 S.Ct. 488 , 94 L.Ed. 585 (1950); Mize v. Sims, 516 S.W.2d 561, 564 (Mo.App.1974). 1981In the Matter of the Estate of Van Cleave, 610 S.W.2d 620, 622 (Mo. banc 1981); Menees v.Cowgill, 359 Mo. 697, 706 , 223 S.W.2d 412, 416 (1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 949 , 70 S.Ct. 488 , 94 L.Ed. 585 (1950); Mize v. Sims, 516 S.W.2d 561, 564 (Mo.App.1974). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Lynn v. Hookaday
green
1 sentence1955Weiss v. Beck, 1 Ill.2d 420 , 115 N.E.2d 768 ; Winkelmann v. Winkelmann, 345 Ill. 566 , 178 N.E. 118 ; Soelzer v. Soelzer, 382 Ill. 393 , 47 N.E.2d 458 ; Fisher v. Davidson, 271 Mo. 195 , 195 S.W. 1024 , L.R.A.1917F, 692; Lynn v. Hockaday, 162 Mo. 111 , 61 S.W. 885 ; Taylor v. Coberly, 327 Mo. 940 , 38 S.W.2d 1055 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Fisher v. Davidson
neutral
2 sentences1955Weiss v. Beck, 1 Ill.2d 420 , 115 N.E.2d 768 ; Winkelmann v. Winkelmann, 345 Ill. 566 , 178 N.E. 118 ; Soelzer v. Soelzer, 382 Ill. 393 , 47 N.E.2d 458 ; Fisher v. Davidson, 271 Mo. 195 , 195 S.W. 1024 , L.R.A.1917F, 692; Lynn v. Hockaday, 162 Mo. 111 , 61 S.W. 885 ; Taylor v. Coberly, 327 Mo. 940 , 38 S.W.2d 1055 . 1955Weiss v. Beck, 1 Ill.2d 420 , 115 N.E.2d 768 ; Winkelmann v. Winkelmann, 345 Ill. 566 , 178 N.E. 118 ; Soelzer v. Soelzer, 382 Ill. 393 , 47 N.E.2d 458 ; Fisher v. Davidson, 271 Mo. 195 , 195 S.W. 1024 , L.R.A.1917F, 692; Lynn v. Hockaday, 162 Mo. 111 , 61 S.W. 885 ; Taylor v. Coberly, 327 Mo. 940 , 38 S.W.2d 1055 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Soelzer v. Soelzer
green
2 sentences1955Weiss v. Beck, 1 Ill.2d 420 , 115 N.E.2d 768 ; Winkelmann v. Winkelmann, 345 Ill. 566 , 178 N.E. 118 ; Soelzer v. Soelzer, 382 Ill. 393 , 47 N.E.2d 458 ; Fisher v. Davidson, 271 Mo. 195 , 195 S.W. 1024 , L.R.A.1917F, 692; Lynn v. Hockaday, 162 Mo. 111 , 61 S.W. 885 ; Taylor v. Coberly, 327 Mo. 940 , 38 S.W.2d 1055 . 1955Weiss v. Beck, 1 Ill.2d 420 , 115 N.E.2d 768 ; Winkelmann v. Winkelmann, 345 Ill. 566 , 178 N.E. 118 ; Soelzer v. Soelzer, 382 Ill. 393 , 47 N.E.2d 458 ; Fisher v. Davidson, 271 Mo. 195 , 195 S.W. 1024 , L.R.A.1917F, 692; Lynn v. Hockaday, 162 Mo. 111 , 61 S.W. 885 ; Taylor v. Coberly, 327 Mo. 940 , 38 S.W.2d 1055 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Winkelmann v. Winkelmann
green
2 sentences1955Weiss v. Beck, 1 Ill.2d 420 , 115 N.E.2d 768 ; Winkelmann v. Winkelmann, 345 Ill. 566 , 178 N.E. 118 ; Soelzer v. Soelzer, 382 Ill. 393 , 47 N.E.2d 458 ; Fisher v. Davidson, 271 Mo. 195 , 195 S.W. 1024 , L.R.A.1917F, 692; Lynn v. Hockaday, 162 Mo. 111 , 61 S.W. 885 ; Taylor v. Coberly, 327 Mo. 940 , 38 S.W.2d 1055 . 1955Weiss v. Beck, 1 Ill.2d 420 , 115 N.E.2d 768 ; Winkelmann v. Winkelmann, 345 Ill. 566 , 178 N.E. 118 ; Soelzer v. Soelzer, 382 Ill. 393 , 47 N.E.2d 458 ; Fisher v. Davidson, 271 Mo. 195 , 195 S.W. 1024 , L.R.A.1917F, 692; Lynn v. Hockaday, 162 Mo. 111 , 61 S.W. 885 ; Taylor v. Coberly, 327 Mo. 940 , 38 S.W.2d 1055 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Taylor v. Coberly
green
2 sentences1955Weiss v. Beck, 1 Ill.2d 420 , 115 N.E.2d 768 ; Winkelmann v. Winkelmann, 345 Ill. 566 , 178 N.E. 118 ; Soelzer v. Soelzer, 382 Ill. 393 , 47 N.E.2d 458 ; Fisher v. Davidson, 271 Mo. 195 , 195 S.W. 1024 , L.R.A.1917F, 692; Lynn v. Hockaday, 162 Mo. 111 , 61 S.W. 885 ; Taylor v. Coberly, 327 Mo. 940 , 38 S.W.2d 1055 . 1955Weiss v. Beck, 1 Ill.2d 420 , 115 N.E.2d 768 ; Winkelmann v. Winkelmann, 345 Ill. 566 , 178 N.E. 118 ; Soelzer v. Soelzer, 382 Ill. 393 , 47 N.E.2d 458 ; Fisher v. Davidson, 271 Mo. 195 , 195 S.W. 1024 , L.R.A.1917F, 692; Lynn v. Hockaday, 162 Mo. 111 , 61 S.W. 885 ; Taylor v. Coberly, 327 Mo. 940 , 38 S.W.2d 1055 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Weiss v. Beck
green
2 sentences1955Weiss v. Beck, 1 Ill.2d 420 , 115 N.E.2d 768 ; Winkelmann v. Winkelmann, 345 Ill. 566 , 178 N.E. 118 ; Soelzer v. Soelzer, 382 Ill. 393 , 47 N.E.2d 458 ; Fisher v. Davidson, 271 Mo. 195 , 195 S.W. 1024 , L.R.A.1917F, 692; Lynn v. Hockaday, 162 Mo. 111 , 61 S.W. 885 ; Taylor v. Coberly, 327 Mo. 940 , 38 S.W.2d 1055 . 1955Weiss v. Beck, 1 Ill.2d 420 , 115 N.E.2d 768 ; Winkelmann v. Winkelmann, 345 Ill. 566 , 178 N.E. 118 ; Soelzer v. Soelzer, 382 Ill. 393 , 47 N.E.2d 458 ; Fisher v. Davidson, 271 Mo. 195 , 195 S.W. 1024 , L.R.A.1917F, 692; Lynn v. Hockaday, 162 Mo. 111 , 61 S.W. 885 ; Taylor v. Coberly, 327 Mo. 940 , 38 S.W.2d 1055 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.